Fw: Latest Dow Comments from our Group

[Guest guest]

----- Original Message -----

From: " ilena rose " <ilena@...>

<Recipient List Suppressed:;>

Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:04 PM

Subject: Latest Dow Comments from our Group

>

>

> From: LEEMAURICE@...

> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:11:41 EST

> Subject: Urgent: Let's keeping writing to Judge Hood!!!

>

> Ilena, will you please post. Thanks URGENT!!!! Ladies, If you didn't get

> a letter written to Judge Hood, please write to her! And post your letter

> for the rest of us to read, if you want to. There is so much I want to say

> to her, that I am thinking about writing to her again.

>

> Judge Hood's address: The Honorable Judge Hood

>

> 231 W. Layfette Room 251

> Detroit, Michigan 48226 or

> Fax: 313-234-5358

>

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~

>

> From: " " <hmmiller@...>

> " Ilena Rose " <ilena@...>

> Subject: Re: Ombnibus Disease Objections

> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:49:11 -0700

>

> I got them in the mail last week too, also have copies from 1997. They

have

> too much money in their hands, they have to start with paper work trails

to

> cover up all the funds they are trying to rip us off for. HMMM how much

did

> that cost them to mail all those letters to all of us???? FOR THE SECOND

> TIME!!!!!

>

>

> ~~~~~~

>

> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:34:32 -0800 (PST)

> LEEMAURICE@...

> Cc: ilena@...

> Subject: Re: Comments on faxes to Judge Hood

>

> we are not PLAINTIFFS ---WE ARE CREDITORS ---THIS IS NOT ILLEGAL

> -----SINCE WHEN IS IT ILLEGAL TO INFORM A JUDGE WHEN A VOTE HAS BEEN

> GOTTEN ILLEGALLY ? the page 25 of Annex A #1 = " A VOTE MAY BE

> DISREGUARDED OR DISALLOWED IF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT IT WAS NOT

> SOLICITED OR PROCURED IN GOOD FAITH OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS

> OF THE BANKRUPCY CODE " >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>also

> -----many WOMEN HAVE COMPLAINED THAT THEY WERE CO-ERCED BY THEIR

> ATTORNEYS INTO A YES VOTE----AND MANY DO NOT KNOW OR HAVE A CLUE AS TO

> WHAT THEIR VOTE WAS OR IF THEY VOTED OR WHY

> ---->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.>>>>>>>>>>>>>now how is the judge supposed to

> make a decision on the whole mess ---and this appeals is ABOUT THE

> VOTE--cause if she sees alot of women are unhappy or misguided in the

> vote or want to change after learning THE FACTS ---just who is going to

> get the information to the judge? the TCC? THEY SEEM TO NOT BE WORRIED

> AT ALL ABOUT THE WOMENS MISUNDERSTADING OF THE VOTE -- you HAVE A RIGHT

> AS A CREDITOR TO MAKE SURE THE VOTE ( THE WAY YOU FEEL ) IS UNDERSTOOOD

> BY THE JUDGE ---ITS ABOUT THE WOMEN CREDITORS --NOT PLAINTIFFS YET

> -----and those ballots originals are supposed to be saved and protected

> by the CORPORATE ELECTION SERVICES ----SO A WOMAN ALSO HAS A RIGHT TO

> SEE HER VOTE AND TO CHANGE IT ---- why are the women trying to frighten

> the others from doing what the can to get this done with all the correct

> info and breaks we deserve THIS STIFFLING AND KEEPING THE WOMEN QUIET

> AND WAITING LIKE SHEEP AT SLAUGHTER IS NOT FAIR -----how can anyone say

> to keep quiet ? wait till its all set and done and then just as the

> women have had to say before --WE SHOULD HAVE STUCK TOGETHER AND MADE

> OUR VOICES HEARD =====if its DONE ---ITS DONE and you can whine and cry

> and say its not fair and what oh what did we do and who can fix it now

> ?????????? IT WILL BE TOO LATE--AT LEAST YOU TRIED --THE CLERK CAN

> ALWAYS HOLD THE FAX AND LETTERS OR COUNT AND DESCRIBE THEM TO THE JUDGE

> AS RULES PERMIT BUT I KNOW THE JUDGE NEEDS TO HEAR THE TRUTH ORSHE CANT

> RULE WITH ANY UNDERSTANDING OF THE FACTS ----this is my feeling and I

> have asked several lawyers who said it was fine to let the judge know of

> any problems with the vote and the way it was presented ---CAROLINE

> I HATE DOW!!!!!

>

>

> ~~~~~~~

>

> From: Gr8luk@...

> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 03:35:41 EST

> Subject: Re: POST TO EVERYONE! Comments on faxes to Judge Hood!

> LEEMAURICE@...

> CC: ilena@..., Kathynye@...

> MIME-Version: 1.0

>

> To Plaintiffs' and Lynda Roth: It is not " illegal " to contact the Judge,

> and anyone can fax an " opinion " to the Judge. Opinions can be helpful to

> the Judge and his/her advisor attys in reviewing the case as a whole and

> there is no law stating you can't write the judge. If there is a

> single/independant lawsuit that is not in this class action about to go to

> trial, then the atty might advise his client not to contact the judge

> because he has representation. TCC attorneys have urged women to speak up

> in the past, and we have the memos, " write the judge, write congress,

march

> to the White House! " . This breast implant lawsuit as a " whole " is a mess,

> a " whole mess " , and it has tied up the court system for 10 years and women

> should be able to express their opinions especially when it has been

> tainted, and stalled. It is time to settle this ongoing OLD litigation

> that is costing millions of dollars, and eating up our damage compensation

> funds. We have the Freedom of Speech ! in our Constitution, and Lynda

> Roth, you are wrong to threaten these women by saying it is illegal to

> express an opinion to the Judge. I sent a letter and I dont mind, as I

hope

> it will get this stymied litigation moving. You are not a lawyer; so have

a

> lawyer say it is " illegal " to write the Judge an opinion. If it is

> bothersome, you can write letters and you don't have to sign your name.

> Thank you for your letter. GRLUK

>

>