Re: FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

[Guest guest]

Hi Ian,

Gosh, these are dark times indeed that appear to be looming up infront of us.

This would have to be equipment that generated frequencies greater than 20kHz,

otherwise the FCC would have to confiscate all electronic music systems and all

personal computers. It would be a trek back to the dark ages.

Luckily for Canadians, Resonant Light have the B/R approved, so this is good. As

it says on their web site, " A Light At The End Of The Tunnel "

With the terrorist laws in place in Australia, anyone the government doesn't

like can disappear, forever, no questions asked, zero rights of appeal, freedom

is already gone. This has made a lot of Australians angry.

Let's hope all people decide to vote this year and common sense is restored.

Regards,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Frex - CHIamp

FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

Dear All,

Please be aware that with or without State Law, Federal laws which

supersede all State and local laws already are on the books. The laws

governing RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) have been used in order to

confiscate Rife-type equipment in the past and will likely be used again as

there is within the law significant room for interpretation as to what is

" Unacceptable RFI " .

Please read:

As with restrictive antenna ordinances, the FCC, through a directive from

Congress, has preempted any concurrent state or local regulation of RFI

pursuant to the provisions of §302(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as

amended. The legal cite is: 47 USC §302(a) and it provides that the:

Commission may, consistent with the public interest, convenience, and

necessity, make reasonable regulations (1) governing the interference potential

of devices which in their operation are capable of emitting radio frequency

energy by radiation, conduction, or other means in sufficient degree to cause

harmful interference to radio communications; and (2) establishing minimum

performance standards for home electronic equipment and systems to reduce their

susceptibility to interference from radio frequency energy. Such regulations

shall be applicable to the manufacture, import, sale, offer for sale, or

shipment of such devices and home electronic equipment and systems, and to the

use of such devices.

Your equipment is only as safe as the government decides. Which

is NOT AT ALL.

Yours,

Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

[Guest guest]

There are so many posts in this vein I hardly know which one to attach my

question to.

Here is my situation. I live near San Francisco. In one of the particular

neighborhoods where I use my new EMEM5A there is a family of Hamm operators

a few streets away.

I am asking all you electronic and frequency minds to tell me whether my

machine operates in a frequency range that is likely to be detected by Hamm

equipment? Or any other device that might search for a frequency generator

or transmitter?

Perhaps you can tell that I watched too many black and white movies about

the Resistance not to be concerned in view of the current discussion...

I am almost sorry that I studied Machiavelli in school. I agree with ;

it is a chilling feeling to need less and less imagination, as an

American, to understand Europe in the 30's.

Recently, there was a small documentary on the preservation and care of the

actual original Declaration of Independence. Because of it's long tenure on

a the wall of a Government office much of the writing has faded to the point

that it is only a memory. I wonder, now, if there are enough copies of that

original that citizens will be able to remember what it said...

http://jayseae.cxliv.org/2006/02/04/what_is_safety_worth_to_you.html

on the choice between liberty and safety

Thanks for all your help making the information accessible to someone so far

outside this field. I really appreciate this list and I AM learning!

....

>

> Dear All,

>

> Please be aware that with or without State Law, Federal laws which

> supersede all State and local laws already are on the books. The laws

> governing RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) have been used in order to

> confiscate Rife-type equipment in the past and will likely be used again as

> there is within the law significant room for interpretation as to what is

> " Unacceptable RFI " .

>

> Please read:

>

>

> As with restrictive antenna ordinances, the FCC, through a directive

> from Congress, has preempted any concurrent state or local regulation of

> RFI pursuant to the provisions of §302(a) of the Communications Act of

> 1934, as amended. The legal cite is: 47 USC §302(a) and it provides that

> the:

>

> Commission may, consistent with the public interest, convenience, and

> necessity, make reasonable regulations (1) governing the interference

> potential of devices which in their operation are capable of emitting radio

> frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means in sufficient

> degree to cause harmful interference to radio communications; and (2)

> establishing minimum performance standards for home electronic equipment

> and systems to reduce their susceptibility to interference from radio

> frequency energy. Such regulations shall be applicable to the manufacture,

> import, sale, offer for sale, or shipment of such devices and home

> electronic equipment and systems, and to the use of such devices.

> Your equipment is only as safe as the government decides.

> Which is NOT AT ALL.

>

> Yours,

>

> Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

>

[Guest guest]

No Ken,

I am afraid you are somewhat off the mark here.

You speak of equipment that has been " FCC Approved " . This approval means that

the FCC will not exercise any actions unless they are terribly out of wack or

have been illegally modified to cause unwarranted interference.

Show me a rife machine with an FCC Approval.

As Australia's terrorist laws are mere carbon-copies of Bush's mandates and as

your government is on record as one of the most repressive 'Democratic' regimes

in the world today, I put no hope on the electoral process fixing your problem

any more than I see the US or UK getting out from underneath without a violent

revolt from within ... which ain't gonna happen either.

Best to you,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

his year and common sense is restored.

Regards,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Frex - CHIamp

FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

Dear All,

Please be aware that with or without State Law, Federal laws which

supersede all State and local laws already are on the books. The laws

governing RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) have been used in order to

confiscate Rife-type equipment in the past and will likely be used again as

there is within the law significant room for interpretation as to what is

" Unacceptable RFI " .

Please read:

As with restrictive antenna ordinances, the FCC, through a directive from

Congress, has preempted any concurrent state or local regulation of RFI

pursuant to the provisions of §302(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as

amended. The legal cite is: 47 USC §302(a) and it provides that the:

Commission may, consistent with the public interest, convenience, and

necessity, make reasonable regulations (1) governing the interference potential

of devices which in their operation are capable of emitting radio frequency

energy by radiation, conduction, or other means in sufficient degree to cause

harmful interference to radio communications; and (2) establishing minimum

performance standards for home electronic equipment and systems to reduce their

susceptibility to interference from radio frequency energy. Such regulations

shall be applicable to the manufacture, import, sale, offer for sale, or

shipment of such devices and home electronic equipment and systems, and to the

use of such devices.

Your equipment is only as safe as the government decides. Which

is NOT AT ALL.

Yours,

Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

[Guest guest]

Gosh Ian,

It's not a pretty picture you paint.

Was this the reason you left America and moved to China ?

I sometimes feel when I read the messages here that I am living a self deluded

life.

I love the US people, the way they talk rings with a special intelligence, a

freedom and confidence that you don't find in many other people. My favourite

clients come from the UK and US, I just love the " pommy " accent too, must have

Celtic ansestors in me somewhere.

When I was a young fella and living in Yorkshire, UK, I fell in love with every

woman I met.

I really hope your wrong about the tough arm of the US government. With all the

problems the countries in the world have, America is still the center of the

free spiritualised world in my books.

The test of real freedom is the ability for people to be allowed to worship any

God and attend any religion that they like. In America, people have total

freedom here as displayed by their great spiritual diversity. This spiritual

diversity can't happen in a country where freedom doesn't exist.

I can only hope Australia does follow the US, I'm kind of proud of the fact that

Australia is considered the 53rd state of the US. We just speak a little

differently.

Regards,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Frex - CHIamp

FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

Dear All,

Please be aware that with or without State Law, Federal laws which

supersede all State and local laws already are on the books. The laws

governing RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) have been used in order to

confiscate Rife-type equipment in the past and will likely be used again as

there is within the law significant room for interpretation as to what is

" Unacceptable RFI " .

Please read:

As with restrictive antenna ordinances, the FCC, through a directive from

Congress, has preempted any concurrent state or local regulation of RFI

pursuant to the provisions of §302(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as

amended. The legal cite is: 47 USC §302(a) and it provides that the:

Commission may, consistent with the public interest, convenience, and

necessity, make reasonable regulations (1) governing the interference potential

of devices which in their operation are capable of emitting radio frequency

energy by radiation, conduction, or other means in sufficient degree to cause

harmful interference to radio communications; and (2) establishing minimum

performance standards for home electronic equipment and systems to reduce their

susceptibility to interference from radio frequency energy. Such regulations

shall be applicable to the manufacture, import, sale, offer for sale, or

shipment of such devices and home electronic equipment and systems, and to the

use of such devices.

Your equipment is only as safe as the government decides. Which

is NOT AT ALL.

Yours,

Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

[Guest guest]

But California just passed a Health Freedom Act that should protect a lot of

this research from prying eyes, I hope! Wait and see.

Terry

Re: FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

Gosh Ian,

It's not a pretty picture you paint.

Was this the reason you left America and moved to China ?

I sometimes feel when I read the messages here that I am living a self

deluded life.

I love the US people, the way they talk rings with a special intelligence, a

freedom and confidence that you don't find in many other people. My

favourite clients come from the UK and US, I just love the " pommy " accent

too, must have Celtic ansestors in me somewhere.

When I was a young fella and living in Yorkshire, UK, I fell in love with

every woman I met.

I really hope your wrong about the tough arm of the US government. With all

the problems the countries in the world have, America is still the center of

the free spiritualised world in my books.

The test of real freedom is the ability for people to be allowed to worship

any God and attend any religion that they like. In America, people have

total freedom here as displayed by their great spiritual diversity. This

spiritual diversity can't happen in a country where freedom doesn't exist.

I can only hope Australia does follow the US, I'm kind of proud of the fact

that Australia is considered the 53rd state of the US. We just speak a

little differently.

Regards,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Frex - CHIamp

FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

Dear All,

Please be aware that with or without State Law, Federal laws which

supersede all State and local laws already are on the books. The laws

governing RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) have been used in order to

confiscate Rife-type equipment in the past and will likely be used again as

there is within the law significant room for interpretation as to what is

" Unacceptable RFI " .

Please read:

As with restrictive antenna ordinances, the FCC, through a directive

from Congress, has preempted any concurrent state or local regulation of

RFI pursuant to the provisions of §302(a) of the Communications Act of

1934, as amended. The legal cite is: 47 USC §302(a) and it provides that

the:

Commission may, consistent with the public interest, convenience, and

necessity, make reasonable regulations (1) governing the interference

potential of devices which in their operation are capable of emitting radio

frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means in sufficient

degree to cause harmful interference to radio communications; and (2)

establishing minimum performance standards for home electronic equipment

and systems to reduce their susceptibility to interference from radio

frequency energy. Such regulations shall be applicable to the manufacture,

import, sale, offer for sale, or shipment of such devices and home

electronic equipment and systems, and to the use of such devices.

Your equipment is only as safe as the government decides.

Which is NOT AT ALL.

Yours,

Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

[Guest guest]

Citizens remembering is not the problem, it's the power hungry politicians

who can't read anymore!

Terry

Re: FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

There are so many posts in this vein I hardly know which one to attach my

question to.

Here is my situation. I live near San Francisco. In one of the particular

neighborhoods where I use my new EMEM5A there is a family of Hamm operators

a few streets away.

I am asking all you electronic and frequency minds to tell me whether my

machine operates in a frequency range that is likely to be detected by Hamm

equipment? Or any other device that might search for a frequency generator

or transmitter?

Perhaps you can tell that I watched too many black and white movies about

the Resistance not to be concerned in view of the current discussion...

I am almost sorry that I studied Machiavelli in school. I agree with ;

it is a chilling feeling to need less and less imagination, as an American,

to understand Europe in the 30's.

Recently, there was a small documentary on the preservation and care of the

actual original Declaration of Independence. Because of it's long tenure on

a the wall of a Government office much of the writing has faded to the point

that it is only a memory. I wonder, now, if there are enough copies of that

original that citizens will be able to remember what it said...

http://jayseae.cxliv.org/2006/02/04/what_is_safety_worth_to_you.html

on the choice between liberty and safety

Thanks for all your help making the information accessible to someone so far

outside this field. I really appreciate this list and I AM learning!

....

>

> Dear All,

>

> Please be aware that with or without State Law, Federal laws which

> supersede all State and local laws already are on the books. The

> laws governing RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) have been used in

> order to confiscate Rife-type equipment in the past and will likely be

> used again as there is within the law significant room for

> interpretation as to what is " Unacceptable RFI " .

>

> Please read:

>

>

> As with restrictive antenna ordinances, the FCC, through a directive

> from Congress, has preempted any concurrent state or local regulation

> of RFI pursuant to the provisions of §302(a) of the Communications Act

> of 1934, as amended. The legal cite is: 47 USC §302(a) and it provides

> that

> the:

>

> Commission may, consistent with the public interest, convenience,

> and necessity, make reasonable regulations (1) governing the

> interference potential of devices which in their operation are capable

> of emitting radio frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other

> means in sufficient degree to cause harmful interference to radio

> communications; and (2) establishing minimum performance standards for

> home electronic equipment and systems to reduce their susceptibility

> to interference from radio frequency energy. Such regulations shall

> be applicable to the manufacture, import, sale, offer for sale, or

> shipment of such devices and home electronic equipment and systems, and

to the use of such devices.

> Your equipment is only as safe as the government decides.

> Which is NOT AT ALL.

>

> Yours,

>

> Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

>

[Guest guest]

, IF your EMEM5A does NOT have a spark gap (spark plug, etc)

inside it, your EMEM is very safe to use and should not cause any

interference. I use an EMEM (without spark gap) all the time with no

problems, and I have both ham radio operators and police and fire near

me. No interference from the EMEM as long as there is no spark gap, OR,

if any spark gap is well shielded and grounded to stop the RF

interference. (One of the reasons I like the EMEM devices!)

If you turn on your EMEM5A and run it, do you hear any interfertence on

either the AM or FM radio bands, or on your TV? Probably not. Safe to

use. If you do hear interference from your machine, maybe check with

the manufacturer and see if shielding can be installed into it to ground

the RF energy from the spark gap, and otherwise use the machine only

when needed to keep the interference to a minimum. (Also one of the

reasons I don't do spark gaps in my EMEM, haven't been able to proove

that it helps.)

Dave Felt

Ham Radio operator, Electronics Engineer, etc..

Mateosian wrote:

> There are so many posts in this vein I hardly know which one to attach my

> question to.

>

> Here is my situation. I live near San Francisco. In one of the particular

> neighborhoods where I use my new EMEM5A there is a family of Hamm operators

> a few streets away.

>

> I am asking all you electronic and frequency minds to tell me whether my

> machine operates in a frequency range that is likely to be detected by Hamm

> equipment? Or any other device that might search for a frequency generator

> or transmitter?

>

[Guest guest]

There are no dark times ahead of us. There are some very dark times behind

us. Remember that prosecution in MN took place NINE years ago.

There are always some well meaning people doing dark things.

The future for frequency therapies regardless of how administered, is

extremely bright.

Jim Bare

>Hi Ian,

>Gosh, these are dark times indeed that appear to be looming up infront of us.

[Guest guest]

You need to understand that allopathic doctors cannot afford to face systems

that they have no control over, especially if these systems might just work,

and they'll do pretty much anything to keep things as they are.

My old Bosses at Sloan Kettering and I (I used to manage their computer

network) had several screaming fights over the fact that every other

victim-er-patient on an equivalent chemo cocktail as mine was on a

wheelchair, while instead I looked healthy enough to seem cancer free.

Their contention was that I must have been doing something that would likely

prevent chemo from saving my life.

When I pointed out that they themselves had mentioned under no uncertain

terms that chemo and radiation were never designed to cure cancer they

insisted I did not know what I was talking about.

The doctors at NY Hospital were only marginally less territorial: I spoke

not two weeks ago with the Nurse Practitioner who had handled my case while

I was a patient there and she was surprised to have me get to the phone and

be rather casual about my condition since their expectation was that I would

not survive much past Spring of 2005.

The doctors I am using now at a local hospital are taking their time

deciding when to declare me " near cancer free " (so that in the meantime I

can get another couple of rounds of chemo, of course), and the urologist has

started insisting for me to consider radical surgery " just in case " : somehow

having my prostate, the bladder and some surrounding tissue removed " just in

case " sounds suspiciously like " let us make some more money out of you " .

If they were to find out how much I benefit from Rife technology and the

advice of people like those on this forum I am sure I'd be in some very deep

doodoo.

By the way, some people have put me in the same category as the truly

knowledgeable members of this group (Bil, Ian, Bruce, etc).

Please know that nothing could be further from the truth.

All I am doing is collecting suggestions from those who have already gone

through what I'm facing, and won.

Luigi

FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

Dear All,

Please be aware that with or without State Law, Federal laws which

supersede all State and local laws already are on the books. The laws

governing RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) have been used in order to

confiscate Rife-type equipment in the past and will likely be used again as

there is within the law significant room for interpretation as to what is

" Unacceptable RFI " .

Please read:

As with restrictive antenna ordinances, the FCC, through a directive

from Congress, has preempted any concurrent state or local regulation of

RFI pursuant to the provisions of §302(a) of the Communications Act of

1934, as amended. The legal cite is: 47 USC §302(a) and it provides that

the:

Commission may, consistent with the public interest, convenience, and

necessity, make reasonable regulations (1) governing the interference

potential of devices which in their operation are capable of emitting radio

frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means in sufficient

degree to cause harmful interference to radio communications; and (2)

establishing minimum performance standards for home electronic equipment

and systems to reduce their susceptibility to interference from radio

frequency energy. Such regulations shall be applicable to the manufacture,

import, sale, offer for sale, or shipment of such devices and home

electronic equipment and systems, and to the use of such devices.

Your equipment is only as safe as the government decides.

Which is NOT AT ALL.

Yours,

Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

[Guest guest]

Ken Brother, don¹t ever give up on America. We are a mix of Hobbits and

Balrogs. Hobbiton and Mordor are uniquely blended in this beautiful land.

From the level of City and county government, we mostly have a great

Democracy. From the State level, we have some democracy and a lot of

corruption. From the Federal level, we are a full-blown fascist Empire, the

very face of Mordor. lee

> Gosh Ian,

>

> It's not a pretty picture you paint.

>

> Was this the reason you left America and moved to China ?

>

> I sometimes feel when I read the messages here that I am living a self deluded

> life.

>

> I love the US people, the way they talk rings with a special intelligence, a

> freedom and confidence that you don't find in many other people. My favourite

> clients come from the UK and US, I just love the " pommy " accent too, must have

> Celtic ansestors in me somewhere.

>

> When I was a young fella and living in Yorkshire, UK, I fell in love with

> every woman I met.

>

> I really hope your wrong about the tough arm of the US government. With all

> the problems the countries in the world have, America is still the center of

> the free spiritualised world in my books.

>

> The test of real freedom is the ability for people to be allowed to worship

> any God and attend any religion that they like. In America, people have total

> freedom here as displayed by their great spiritual diversity. This spiritual

> diversity can't happen in a country where freedom doesn't exist.

>

> I can only hope Australia does follow the US, I'm kind of proud of the fact

> that Australia is considered the 53rd state of the US. We just speak a little

> differently.

>

> Regards,

> Ken Uzzell

> http://heal-me.com.au

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Farady cage would be the answer. For the design work I do with RF in

the 902-928 MHz band. Your unlicensed transmitter is limited in

power to less then 1 milliwatt with a unity gain antenna and less

then .0001 milliwatts in harmonic content outside of the unlicensed

band. This of course is for FCC compliance of commercially sold

equipment. If you have a device that is noncompliant, then the FCC

could take it away or force you not to use it indicating that it

could cause interference with compliant systems. Most other parts of

the spectrum are governed just as tight as this one.

>

> The solution is to build a metal cage, " Faraday Cages " will deal

with

> interference issues and there is NO WAY that they can confiscate

your

> machine unless they can prove the laws of physics have changed.

(scalar wave

> don't exist according to the current status quo) Thats of course

if

> interference is the real problem. I know that Dr Holt had a

shielded room to

> do all his work.

>

> Cheers

>

> ----- Original Message -----

>

[Guest guest]

That's simple to fix on the instruction for your device add " This equipment

must only be used in a faraday cage " this would limit your liability to a

very large extent.

Cheers

P.S. that's how drug manufactures get away with there drugs causing

reactions.

Re: FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

> Farady cage would be the answer. For the design work I do with RF in

> the 902-928 MHz band. Your unlicensed transmitter is limited in

> power to less then 1 milliwatt with a unity gain antenna and less

> then .0001 milliwatts in harmonic content outside of the unlicensed

> band. This of course is for FCC compliance of commercially sold

> equipment. If you have a device that is noncompliant, then the FCC

> could take it away or force you not to use it indicating that it

> could cause interference with compliant systems. Most other parts of

> the spectrum are governed just as tight as this one.

>

>

>

>

>>

>> The solution is to build a metal cage, " Faraday Cages " will deal

> with

>> interference issues and there is NO WAY that they can confiscate

> your

>> machine unless they can prove the laws of physics have changed.

> (scalar wave

>> don't exist according to the current status quo) Thats of course

> if

>> interference is the real problem. I know that Dr Holt had a

> shielded room to

>> do all his work.

>>

>> Cheers

>>

>> ----- Original Message -----

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi,

I still remain skeptical. There seems to be too many vested interests when it

comes to developed countries, allopathic medicine and so-called terminal

diseases.

Terry McClelland wrote:

But California just passed a Health Freedom Act that should protect a lot of

this research from prying eyes, I hope! Wait and see.

Terry

Re: FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

Gosh Ian,

It's not a pretty picture you paint.

Was this the reason you left America and moved to China ?

I sometimes feel when I read the messages here that I am living a self

deluded life.

I love the US people, the way they talk rings with a special intelligence, a

freedom and confidence that you don't find in many other people. My

favourite clients come from the UK and US, I just love the " pommy " accent

too, must have Celtic ansestors in me somewhere.

When I was a young fella and living in Yorkshire, UK, I fell in love with

every woman I met.

I really hope your wrong about the tough arm of the US government. With all

the problems the countries in the world have, America is still the center of

the free spiritualised world in my books.

The test of real freedom is the ability for people to be allowed to worship

any God and attend any religion that they like. In America, people have

total freedom here as displayed by their great spiritual diversity. This

spiritual diversity can't happen in a country where freedom doesn't exist.

I can only hope Australia does follow the US, I'm kind of proud of the fact

that Australia is considered the 53rd state of the US. We just speak a

little differently.

Regards,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Frex - CHIamp

FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

Dear All,

Please be aware that with or without State Law, Federal laws which

supersede all State and local laws already are on the books. The laws

governing RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) have been used in order to

confiscate Rife-type equipment in the past and will likely be used again as

there is within the law significant room for interpretation as to what is

" Unacceptable RFI " .

Please read:

As with restrictive antenna ordinances, the FCC, through a directive

from Congress, has preempted any concurrent state or local regulation of

RFI pursuant to the provisions of §302(a) of the Communications Act of

1934, as amended. The legal cite is: 47 USC §302(a) and it provides that

the:

Commission may, consistent with the public interest, convenience, and

necessity, make reasonable regulations (1) governing the interference

potential of devices which in their operation are capable of emitting radio

frequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means in sufficient

degree to cause harmful interference to radio communications; and (2)

establishing minimum performance standards for home electronic equipment

and systems to reduce their susceptibility to interference from radio

frequency energy. Such regulations shall be applicable to the manufacture,

import, sale, offer for sale, or shipment of such devices and home

electronic equipment and systems, and to the use of such devices.

Your equipment is only as safe as the government decides.

Which is NOT AT ALL.

Yours,

Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

[Guest guest]

Hi Lee,

Who's got the Ring ?

;-)

Ken Brother, don¹t ever give up on America. We are a mix of Hobbits and

Balrogs. Hobbiton and Mordor are uniquely blended in this beautiful land.

From the level of City and county government, we mostly have a great

Democracy. From the State level, we have some democracy and a lot of

corruption. From the Federal level, we are a full-blown fascist Empire, the

very face of Mordor. lee

[Guest guest]

More important, who got the shaft.

Terry

Re: FCC has control over Rife-type equipment.

Hi Lee,

Who's got the Ring ?

;-)

Ken Brother, don¹t ever give up on America. We are a mix of Hobbits and

Balrogs. Hobbiton and Mordor are uniquely blended in this beautiful land.

From the level of City and county government, we mostly have a great

Democracy. From the State level, we have some democracy and a lot of

corruption. From the Federal level, we are a full-blown fascist Empire,

the

very face of Mordor. lee

[Guest guest]

To reduce radiation on what ever device you may use, you must keep

the output and the returning ground wire as short as reasonable. The

longer the wire the more easily it will radiate at the lower

frequencies. Running the output and input wires parallel or twisted

together will reduce radiation, only if high voltage arcing is not a

problem. As was already mentioned shielding the spark gap will help

alot.

> >

> > If you have an EMEM device you don't need to shield it. Very low

> > power and mostly audio frequencies (some weak RF harmonics).

> > had asked about her EMEM5.

> >

> > Bil

> >

> > PC 1000

> > M-Pulse 5000 magnetic pulse generator

> > http://magpulser.com

> > Mammoth Lakes, CA

> >

> >

> > mailto:magpulser@...

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Bil,

I have found the spark gap is indeed the best way to produce

harmonics and the RF level I believe is safe as well. I shown some

tips below for someone that is worried about the FCC causing them

problems. I don't think any of us should be concerned about the FCC

unless we sell equipment. The ignition system as well as other

electronics in your car must pass FCC compliance testing before they

can be released for sale.

> >> >

> >> > If you have an EMEM device you don't need to shield it. Very

low

> >> > power and mostly audio frequencies (some weak RF harmonics).

> >> > had asked about her EMEM5.

> >> >

> >> > Bil

> >> >

> >> > PC 1000

> >> > M-Pulse 5000 magnetic pulse generator

> >> > http://magpulser.com

> >> > Mammoth Lakes, CA

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > mailto:magpulser@

> >>

> >>

> >>

[Guest guest]

Bil, the danger in an EMEM which generates RF interference is that

neighbors might complain if it creates noise on their TVs or Radios, and

this could bring unwanted attention. One fellow with an EMEM lives next

to a police station (fortunately his EMEM doesn't have the spark plug),

and I'd suggest that interfering with the police or fire department's

radios is a Really Bad idea. He has never had any complaints from his

EMEM running.

I like the non-spark plug EMEM units. I wonder if the folks building the

spark plug versions could place a RV shield around the spark plug?

I agree that there would never be enough RF signal from an EMEM with a

spark plus to be a health hazard from the spark plug.. That's not the

concern.

The health hazard would be the SWAT team blazing away thru the door as

they storm the house (Yes, that happens in LA, fortunately NOT because

of an EMEM.) These guys have no sense of humor and usually only knock

first as the door bursts in. One does NOT want to interfere with public

safety or air traffic control communications.

Dave

Bil Green wrote:

> But what's wrong with the low level " radiation " ? The whole idea

> of the spark plug (if used, most models don't have one) is to

> provide some harmonics in the form of low power RF to aid in

> killing the microbes (or whatever).

>

> Since it's not always easy to find the exact frequency needed,

> having lots of harmonics sometimes provides (by chance) at least

> one more freq that helps. Same with the square wave.

>

> I've never heard any evidence that an EMEM plasma system produces

> enough RF to be dangerous.

>

> Bil

>