Re: Why do most people not believe in Rife?

[Guest guest]

Dear ,

Most people don't believe in Rife Technology because of their own fears,

prejudices, and an intensive indoctrination by the medical industrial complex.

From cradle to the grave for hundreds, if not thousands, of years we have been

told of the sacredness of the medical profession in its grande wisdom and

complete knowledge and authority in all matters of the body, heart, and even the

soul since the religion of Freudism.

The laws of the land have been written and rewritten to protect the sacredness

of the recognised medical practice and in this has arisen the Pharmaceutical

Industry in its might and glory. As time has gone on the industry has become

the largest and most profitable in the world and this has only increased the

propaganda that we call fact.

Notice if you will that, while the oil companies' revenues are under extreme

scrutiny in the media at this time, there is absolutely no mention of the

pharmaceutical revenues and profits.

People are sheep. Sheep do not think, they follow.

I hope this has been of help.

Warmest Regards,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

McGuire wrote:

Why is it tha most people do not beleive that Rife technology can work and is

legitimate? Sure there are probably bad machines out there and all that, but

adusting for the bad machines, why is it such a hard sell and why have we on the

list bought into it?

Angie

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of the truth

through relentless research and infinite patience.

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

Dear Dr. MacLeod:

I believe you have mistakenly directed your rife philosophies to wards me

when it appears was the poser of the question. I'm for rife 100% and

realize sadly there are too many societal sheep in more ways than one.

Regards,

- Original Message -----

To: <Rife >

Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 7:57 PM

Subject: Re: Why do most people not believe in Rife?

Dear ,

Most people don't believe in Rife Technology because of their own fears,

prejudices, and an intensive indoctrination by the medical industrial

complex.

From cradle to the grave for hundreds, if not thousands, of years we have

been told of the sacredness of the medical profession in its grande wisdom

and complete knowledge and authority in all matters of the body, heart, and

even the soul since the religion of Freudism.

The laws of the land have been written and rewritten to protect the

sacredness of the recognised medical practice and in this has arisen the

Pharmaceutical Industry in its might and glory. As time has gone on the

industry has become the largest and most profitable in the world and this

has only increased the propaganda that we call fact.

Notice if you will that, while the oil companies' revenues are under

extreme scrutiny in the media at this time, there is absolutely no mention

of the pharmaceutical revenues and profits.

People are sheep. Sheep do not think, they follow.

I hope this has been of help.

Warmest Regards,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

McGuire wrote:

Why is it tha most people do not beleive that Rife technology can work and

is legitimate? Sure there are probably bad machines out there and all that,

but adusting for the bad machines, why is it such a hard sell and why have

we on the list bought into it?

Angie

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of the truth

through relentless research and infinite patience.

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

Oh dear,

My apologies . Although it was actually meant as a wakeup call for all

Rifers in general.

Keep up the good work in your own Rife research.

Warmest Regards,

Ian

medusa wrote: Dear Dr. MacLeod:

I believe you have mistakenly directed your rife philosophies to wards me

when it appears was the poser of the question. I'm for rife 100% and

realize sadly there are too many societal sheep in more ways than one.

Regards,

- Original Message -----

To: <Rife >

Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 7:57 PM

Subject: Re: Why do most people not believe in Rife?

Dear ,

Most people don't believe in Rife Technology because of their own fears,

prejudices, and an intensive indoctrination by the medical industrial

complex.

From cradle to the grave for hundreds, if not thousands, of years we have

been told of the sacredness of the medical profession in its grande wisdom

and complete knowledge and authority in all matters of the body, heart, and

even the soul since the religion of Freudism.

The laws of the land have been written and rewritten to protect the

sacredness of the recognised medical practice and in this has arisen the

Pharmaceutical Industry in its might and glory. As time has gone on the

industry has become the largest and most profitable in the world and this

has only increased the propaganda that we call fact.

Notice if you will that, while the oil companies' revenues are under

extreme scrutiny in the media at this time, there is absolutely no mention

of the pharmaceutical revenues and profits.

People are sheep. Sheep do not think, they follow.

I hope this has been of help.

Warmest Regards,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

McGuire wrote:

Why is it tha most people do not beleive that Rife technology can work and

is legitimate? Sure there are probably bad machines out there and all that,

but adusting for the bad machines, why is it such a hard sell and why have

we on the list bought into it?

Angie

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of the truth

through relentless research and infinite patience.

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

I call them Sheeple ... but once they awake they can't believe what they

see!!!! You know they do wakeup...I did, and many of us here did too. The

good thing about sheeple...if you grab the lead sheep they all follow, my

flock is slowly coming down my path now, be it a long way behind but they

are coming.

Food for thought

Re: Why do most people not believe in Rife?

Dear Dr. MacLeod:

I believe you have mistakenly directed your rife philosophies to wards me

when it appears was the poser of the question. I'm for rife 100% and

realize sadly there are too many societal sheep in more ways than one.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

Hello all,

I am new to the group and this is my first post. I just had to add

my wholehearted agreement to this reply. Sadly the intensive

indoctrination is so extensive, it affects many (if not all?)aspects

of our lives.

As an EFT practitioner I work with an energy body which does not

exist as far as western medicine would have us believe. I am

continually delighted with the results of my work and pefer to dwell

upon the amazing successes and discoveries of this work rather than

waste one minute listening to or worrying about the dyed in the wool

sheep.

Best wishes

Barbara

>

> Dear ,

>

> Most people don't believe in Rife Technology because of their

own fears, prejudices, and an intensive indoctrination by the

medical industrial complex.

>

[Guest guest]

We can't blame people too much for being critical of Rife. After all

if you want electrical work done you call a electrician or a plummer

to fix you rusted pipes. You know that they can probably do it better

then you can. So people expect their Doctor to know more then they do

and do what is best for them.

I myself know better and will only go to a Doctor if I feel a real

need to.

> Why is it tha most people do not beleive that Rife technology can

work and is legitimate? Sure there are probably bad machines out

there and all that, but adusting for the bad machines, why is it such

a hard sell and why have we on the list bought into it?

>

> Angie

>

>

> Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of

the truth through relentless research and infinite patience.

> __________________________________________________

>

[Guest guest]

Who believes, that others don't believe? :-)

gesi

==============================

medusa wrote:

> Dear Dr. MacLeod:

>

> I believe you have mistakenly directed your rife philosophies to wards me

> when it appears was the poser of the question. I'm for rife 100% and

> realize sadly there are too many societal sheep in more ways than one.

>

> Regards,

>

[Guest guest]

Actually, you can and should blame people for being the cowardly, sheep-like

followers that they are. They are not unwilling members of the unthinking

masses, but have voluntarily followed into the flock for what they deem to be

their own safety, security ... whatever they call it.

Most cannot put a date or an event to it ... but somewhere in the time of their

lives they have made the choice. It is for this reason that they are to blame.

As lambs to the slaughter there should be no pity, but loathing and disgust at

their behaviours.

ly, it will help to enrich the gene pool.

Yours in Earnest,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

martin7730 wrote: We can't blame people too much for

being critical of Rife. After all

if you want electrical work done you call a electrician or a plummer

to fix you rusted pipes. You know that they can probably do it better

then you can. So people expect their Doctor to know more then they do

and do what is best for them.

I myself know better and will only go to a Doctor if I feel a real

need to.

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of the truth

through relentless research and infinite patience.

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

Dear Ian,

I have read your numerous posts over time and have been most impressed

with your knowledge and compassion. Thus it is with some reservation

that I take exception to your latest thoughts.

I do not think the problem is one of people being cowardly and

following blindly like sheep. Rather I think it is a matter of WHAT

THEY SEE THAT WORKS.

While I totally agree with you and others who observe that in Western

societies Big Pharma has distorted medical practice, still few would

deny that penicillin was a great discovery. And for the moment, let us

suspend discussion of the consequences of using drugs to mask the

underlying causes of illness.

Let us say we have a mother of a child who wakes up with a sore throat

and fever. Her child is having trouble breathing and is in pain. She

is going to call her doctor and receive a prescription for antibiotics

NOT because she is a sheep or is a coward, but because, on the basis

of her previous observations, she knows this will get her child well.

These results are fairly predictable.

Neither the doctor nor the mother reaches for a Rife machine because

neither of them has had previous observations relating to the success

of the Rife machine in treating children with such a condition.

Whose fault is that?

While it is easy and convenient to say it is because the medical

profession does not teach Rife to students, indeed actively suppresses

such information because of monetary considerations, I think that idea

belittles the budding physician.

Many of us, certainly I, and likely yourself included, have turned to

alternative concepts because we were unhappy with the results of

conventional therapy. Or concerned about the possible consequences-

such as unwelcome side effects from the use of drugs.

Speaking only for myself, I have found that while alternative therapy

offers many worthwhile solutions to the ills of my patients, it, like

conventional medicine, does not solve everything. It, like

conventional practice, also has unwelcome side effects and thus I

continue to search for a " better solution. "

When enough people get sufficient, sustainable results using Rife, it

will gain the acceptance all of us in these groups seek despite the

overwhelming efforts of Big Med and Big Pharma to stamp it out. Until

then, we will continue to seek this machine or that, use this

frequency or that one. Essentially this is " take two and call in the

morning. "

Nate Berger

>

> Actually, you can and should blame people for being the cowardly,

sheep-like followers that they are. They are not unwilling members of

the unthinking masses, but have voluntarily followed into the flock

for what they deem to be their own safety, security ... whatever they

call it.

>

> Most cannot put a date or an event to it ... but somewhere in the

time of their lives they have made the choice. It is for this reason

that they are to blame. As lambs to the slaughter there should be no

pity, but loathing and disgust at their behaviours.

>

> ly, it will help to enrich the gene pool.

>

> Yours in Earnest,

>

> Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Dr. Berger,

I always enjoy your posts and take all advice as intelligent and well-meant.

Let us agree to disagree my good friend. Keep up the good work.

With Greatest Respect,

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

" Dr. S. Berger " wrote:

Dear Ian,

I have read your numerous posts over time and have been most impressed

with your knowledge and compassion. Thus it is with some reservation

that I take exception to your latest thoughts.

I do not think the problem is one of people being cowardly and

following blindly like sheep. Rather I think it is a matter of WHAT

THEY SEE THAT WORKS.

While I totally agree with you and others who observe that in Western

societies Big Pharma has distorted medical practice, still few would

deny that penicillin was a great discovery. And for the moment, let us

suspend discussion of the consequences of using drugs to mask the

underlying causes of illness.

Let us say we have a mother of a child who wakes up with a sore throat

and fever. Her child is having trouble breathing and is in pain. She

is going to call her doctor and receive a prescription for antibiotics

NOT because she is a sheep or is a coward, but because, on the basis

of her previous observations, she knows this will get her child well.

These results are fairly predictable.

Neither the doctor nor the mother reaches for a Rife machine because

neither of them has had previous observations relating to the success

of the Rife machine in treating children with such a condition.

Whose fault is that?

While it is easy and convenient to say it is because the medical

profession does not teach Rife to students, indeed actively suppresses

such information because of monetary considerations, I think that idea

belittles the budding physician.

Many of us, certainly I, and likely yourself included, have turned to

alternative concepts because we were unhappy with the results of

conventional therapy. Or concerned about the possible consequences-

such as unwelcome side effects from the use of drugs.

Speaking only for myself, I have found that while alternative therapy

offers many worthwhile solutions to the ills of my patients, it, like

conventional medicine, does not solve everything. It, like

conventional practice, also has unwelcome side effects and thus I

continue to search for a " better solution. "

When enough people get sufficient, sustainable results using Rife, it

will gain the acceptance all of us in these groups seek despite the

overwhelming efforts of Big Med and Big Pharma to stamp it out. Until

then, we will continue to seek this machine or that, use this

frequency or that one. Essentially this is " take two and call in the

morning. "

Nate Berger

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of the truth

through relentless research and infinite patience.

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

Having been an Electrical Engineer for some time, I have very little

interest about how medicine works, etc. I have a definite interest

in electronics and very open minded about various avenues to improve

ones health. I've even delved into free energy research. Even the

most educated among us would be too close minded to even consider

Rife over conventional medicine.

Some people are too close minded and as Ian puts like sheep. People

who do research in this field I am sure are subjected to criticism

by the same fools who are the close minded sheep.

> Dear Ian,

>

> I have read your numerous posts over time and have been most

impressed

> with your knowledge and compassion. Thus it is with some

reservation

> that I take exception to your latest thoughts.

>

> I do not think the problem is one of people being cowardly and

> following blindly like sheep. Rather I think it is a matter of WHAT

> THEY SEE THAT WORKS.

>

> While I totally agree with you and others who observe that in

Western

> societies Big Pharma has distorted medical practice, still few

would

> deny that penicillin was a great discovery. And for the moment,

let us

> suspend discussion of the consequences of using drugs to mask the

> underlying causes of illness.

>

> Let us say we have a mother of a child who wakes up with a sore

throat

> and fever. Her child is having trouble breathing and is in pain.

She

> is going to call her doctor and receive a prescription for

antibiotics

> NOT because she is a sheep or is a coward, but because, on the

basis

> of her previous observations, she knows this will get her child

well.

>

> These results are fairly predictable.

>

> Neither the doctor nor the mother reaches for a Rife machine

because

> neither of them has had previous observations relating to the

success

> of the Rife machine in treating children with such a condition.

>

> Whose fault is that?

>

> While it is easy and convenient to say it is because the medical

> profession does not teach Rife to students, indeed actively

suppresses

> such information because of monetary considerations, I think that

idea

> belittles the budding physician.

>

> Many of us, certainly I, and likely yourself included, have turned

to

> alternative concepts because we were unhappy with the results of

> conventional therapy. Or concerned about the possible consequences-

> such as unwelcome side effects from the use of drugs.

>

> Speaking only for myself, I have found that while alternative

therapy

> offers many worthwhile solutions to the ills of my patients, it,

like

> conventional medicine, does not solve everything. It, like

> conventional practice, also has unwelcome side effects and thus I

> continue to search for a " better solution. "

>

> When enough people get sufficient, sustainable results using Rife,

it

> will gain the acceptance all of us in these groups seek despite the

> overwhelming efforts of Big Med and Big Pharma to stamp it out.

Until

> then, we will continue to seek this machine or that, use this

> frequency or that one. Essentially this is " take two and call in

the

> morning. "

>

> Nate Berger

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D., New Lhasa Research Facility, In search of

the truth through relentless research and infinite patience.

> __________________________________________________

>

[Guest guest]

For a different perspective on why people group together and blend

into their surroundings:

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=43948 & nfid=nl

What I find fascinating about one implication of Life's Harsh Lessons

'make You More Gullible' is how leaders seem to have known this for

millenia, judging from historical events as well as behaviors that I

see everyday, both in myself as well as in others. Is it possible

that when one is taught they're bad, that lesson tends to create a

more malleable mind?

Here's a particularly noteworthy quote from the referenced link: " This

is because the person may have learned to distrust their actions,

judgements and decisions due to the fact that the majority of the time

their actions have been perceived to invite negative consequences. "

If it's true, and I believe it is, then that's an effect that could be

intentionally used and/or abused as well as unintentionally passed on.

***

This is my first post in this group (I think), and I simply do not

know about rife treatment: whether it works, or not.

I was admittedly impressed to learn that the Canadian medical

authorities apparently approved a particular rife machine for pain

control.

[Guest guest]

Hi,

Many people believe in Rife. I'm one of them.

martin7730 wrote: Having been an Electrical

Engineer for some time, I have very little

interest about how medicine works, etc. I have a definite interest

in electronics and very open minded about various avenues to improve

ones health. I've even delved into free energy research. Even the

most educated among us would be too close minded to even consider

Rife over conventional medicine.

Some people are too close minded and as Ian puts like sheep. People

who do research in this field I am sure are subjected to criticism

by the same fools who are the close minded sheep.

> Dear Ian,

>

> I have read your numerous posts over time and have been most

impressed

> with your knowledge and compassion. Thus it is with some

reservation

> that I take exception to your latest thoughts.

>

> I do not think the problem is one of people being cowardly and

> following blindly like sheep. Rather I think it is a matter of WHAT

> THEY SEE THAT WORKS.

>

> While I totally agree with you and others who observe that in

Western

> societies Big Pharma has distorted medical practice, still few

would

> deny that penicillin was a great discovery. And for the moment,

let us

> suspend discussion of the consequences of using drugs to mask the

> underlying causes of illness.

>

> Let us say we have a mother of a child who wakes up with a sore

throat

> and fever. Her child is having trouble breathing and is in pain.

She

> is going to call her doctor and receive a prescription for

antibiotics

> NOT because she is a sheep or is a coward, but because, on the

basis

> of her previous observations, she knows this will get her child

well.

>

> These results are fairly predictable.

>

> Neither the doctor nor the mother reaches for a Rife machine

because

> neither of them has had previous observations relating to the

success

> of the Rife machine in treating children with such a condition.

>

> Whose fault is that?

>

> While it is easy and convenient to say it is because the medical

> profession does not teach Rife to students, indeed actively

suppresses

> such information because of monetary considerations, I think that

idea

> belittles the budding physician.

>

> Many of us, certainly I, and likely yourself included, have turned

to

> alternative concepts because we were unhappy with the results of

> conventional therapy. Or concerned about the possible consequences-

> such as unwelcome side effects from the use of drugs.

>

> Speaking only for myself, I have found that while alternative

therapy

> offers many worthwhile solutions to the ills of my patients, it,

like

> conventional medicine, does not solve everything. It, like

> conventional practice, also has unwelcome side effects and thus I

> continue to search for a " better solution. "

>

> When enough people get sufficient, sustainable results using Rife,

it

> will gain the acceptance all of us in these groups seek despite the

> overwhelming efforts of Big Med and Big Pharma to stamp it out.

Until

> then, we will continue to seek this machine or that, use this

> frequency or that one. Essentially this is " take two and call in

the

> morning. "

>

> Nate Berger

>

[Guest guest]

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/340528.shtml

I realize it is OT to tell about the guys killed for using alt energy;

ie eugene mallove, and stan meyers (water run car), and others. But it

is related to the issues being discussed. Ian has cautioned the group,

because of his experience, yes here in the " free " USA. Sooner or

later, Other countries, like China will use Rife, and water energy, or

zero point energy, leaving the US in the dust, and giving them a

financial lead.

[Guest guest]

Unfortunately, you are correct. The United States and the United

Kingdom are ruled by selfish and short-sighted despots under the guise

of " freely elected " officers. They will continue to look toward their

own interests until, one day, they find that the world has not only

passed them by but has buried them up to their necs in their own waste!

Sad, but " ... as ye sew, so shall ye reap ... "

Dr. Ian MacLeod, Ph.D.

>

> http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/340528.shtml

>

> I realize it is OT to tell about the guys killed for using alt energy;

> ie eugene mallove, and stan meyers (water run car), and others. But it

> is related to the issues being discussed. Ian has cautioned the group,

> because of his experience, yes here in the " free " USA. Sooner or

> later, Other countries, like China will use Rife, and water energy, or

> zero point energy, leaving the US in the dust, and giving them a

> financial lead.

>