Guest guest Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 At my son's ARD meeting a brief discussion ensued because my husband arrived late. They said you have to be in attendance for the entire meeting to vote (but bent the rules for my husband after all). So perhaps you can tell them it is your understanding that participants need to be in attendance during the entire meeting and they are able to vote. Maggie willsonpam wrote: I have two questions for the group. At my son's last ARD/IEP meeting all the required school personnel were in attendance as well as two of my relatives. Because of printer failure, the school was not able to print a copy of the ARD/IEP. The next week I received a copy with the school personnel signatures (all agreeing). I signed disagree. The relatives that were at the meeting were not allowed to sign agree or disagree. I maintain that since they were at the meeting they were part of the ARD committee and should be allowed to sign and indicate they disagree. The school maintains that they are not part of the ARD committee. Also, during the meeting I requested several changes to 's BIP. The school refused. I asked for PWN. The school's PWN states that an option considered was changing BIP to include suggestions from parent. The reason the school rejected was " does not need changes at this time. " I wrote the school back and requested the PWN detail the five items the parents wanted be listed separately, and that the reason the school rejected each of them needed to include citation of research based, peer reviewed data to support each denial, a description of each evaluation procedure, assessment, record, or report the school district used in deciding to refuse each of the five requests, and how the evaluation, assessment, record or report supports the school's decision in each request. I also stated that the school's phrase " does not need changes at this time " probably wouldn't hold up to legal scrutiny as being a legally defensible response. The school response today is " A prior written notice is not required for the request you have made. This type of notice is required only when the school proposes or refuses to: identify your child as a student who needs special education; evaluate your child; place your child in a special education program; change your child's placement; or change the free appropriate public education provided to your child. " I am maintaining that they refused to change the FAPE to my child to one that would benefit him educationally and behaviorally and as such my request is valid. I would appreciate opinions/responses from the group. If you would like to respond privately, my email is willson@... Thanks in advance, Pam --------------------------------- All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Everyone.... It is against the law for ARD committees to VOTE on anything!!!! Voting is not allowed per federal law!!! The group must come to a " consensus " agreement. But if they ever actually hold a " vote " and ask people to raise their hands, that is against the law!!! ARG!!! nna Maggie Everts wrote: > > At my son's ARD meeting a brief discussion ensued because my husband arrived late. They said you have to be in attendance for the entire meeting to vote (but bent the rules for my husband after all). So perhaps you can tell them it is your understanding that participants need to be in attendance during the entire meeting and they are able to vote. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Interesting - In our ARD/IEP meeting this summer, there was no one to type up the minutes of the meeting so I just signed in the proper place with the understanding a copy of everything would be sent to me. It was sent but I now realize that I should have read it before I signed it - I have more than a few questions about the IEP. Next time I will understand there is no hurry to sign something I have not read and agree with - Live and learn. ) Just want to publicly thank everyone who posts on this group. It is very helpful to know there are many others who have experience and are willing to help those of us who are beginning the process. Debbie Debbie Andrick >>^..^<< <http://www.gethealthyjuice.com/> www.gethealthyjuice.com If I could get your kids to eat 5-9 servings of fruits and veggies every day, would it be worth $10 a week to you? Who do you know that wants ......to be healthier? ......to insure a healthier pregnancy and have a healthier baby?......to improve their child's immune system? .....to prevent diseases like cancer, diabetes, heart disease and other chronic diseases?......to improve their quality of life while dealing with chronic disease? Let me tell them about Juice Plus+ - Ingredients are apples, cranberries, cherries, dates, oranges, papaya, peaches, pineapples, beets, broccoli, carrots, cabbage, kale, tomatoes, parsley, spinach, barley (no gluten), and oats (no gluten). The Vineyard Blend adds Blueberries, Grape Juice Powder, Blackberries, Bilberries, Grape Seed, Raspberry, Elderberries, Cranberry, Red Currants, and Black Currants. " The news isn't that fruits and vegetables are good for you. It's that they are so good for you they could save your life. " By Bjerklie, TIME Magazine, October 20, 2003, p. 50 " Every medical condition can be improved by good nutrition. " Dr. Delia Board Certified Radiation Oncologist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Hi nna, Could you explain this concept a bit more? The school always holds a " staffing " (without me of course) prior to the ARD to decide what they will offer in the way of services, so they have " their consensus " . What I don't understand is how an IEP can be totally inappropriate and yet the District claims that the agreed/disagree only means that if you " agree " you are stating that the report was put together by qualified personnel. This was a big issue for me because none of the people from the District even know my child, yet they all signed " agree " . Can you shed some light on what the responsibilities are regarding agree vs. disagree? What does it actually mean? _____ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of nna Bond Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 9:40 AM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy Subject: Re: ARD committee members and PWN Everyone.... It is against the law for ARD committees to VOTE on anything!!!! Voting is not allowed per federal law!!! The group must come to a " consensus " agreement. But if they ever actually hold a " vote " and ask people to raise their hands, that is against the law!!! ARG!!! nna Maggie Everts wrote: > > At my son's ARD meeting a brief discussion ensued because my husband arrived late. They said you have to be in attendance for the entire meeting to vote (but bent the rules for my husband after all). So perhaps you can tell them it is your understanding that participants need to be in attendance during the entire meeting and they are able to vote. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Oooooooooh no, no, no, no, no. If you agree, you are essentially signing a contract with the school that your child's IEPs are what is written and this is what his educational program will be. It sounds like it would be very helpful for you to get a copy of From Emotions to Advocacy from www.wrightslaw.com. You may even want to spend some time on the website researching those questions yourself. S. Re: ARD committee members and PWN Everyone.... It is against the law for ARD committees to VOTE on anything!!!! Voting is not allowed per federal law!!! The group must come to a " consensus " agreement. But if they ever actually hold a " vote " and ask people to raise their hands, that is against the law!!! ARG!!! nna Maggie Everts wrote: > > At my son's ARD meeting a brief discussion ensued because my husband arrived late. They said you have to be in attendance for the entire meeting to vote (but bent the rules for my husband after all). So perhaps you can tell them it is your understanding that participants need to be in attendance during the entire meeting and they are able to vote. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Advocacy issues regarding autism treatment in Texas said " A SE coordinator was telling me that their " agreement " did not mean the same. I thought she was demented, so that is why I am asking. " , Your SE coordinator IS demented! Agreement means that everyone agrees with EVERYTHING that is written in the document. It does NOT mean that they agree that people who are certified wrote it. (arg! - that may be one of the stupidest things I have ever heard). If you do not agree with EVERYTHING in the IEP, SIGN DISAGREE!!! The sky will not fall...you will simply meet again in 10 school days to introduce other options and work out a compromise/agreement. And...a consensus includes THE PARENT, always, and, when possible, THE STUDENT. nna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Hi nna, There was no way I was going to agree to that piece of cr*p. Let me ask you this: how can any school official that does not know your child " agree " ? It goes without saying that they cannot possible know if the IEP is appropriate if they have not even met the child. It seems to me those without direct knowledge of your child should abstain, yet I've never seen that happen. _____ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of nna Bond Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 9:44 AM To: Texas Autism Advocacy Subject: Re: ARD committee members and PWN Advocacy issues regarding autism treatment in Texas said " A SE coordinator was telling me that their " agreement " did not mean the same. I thought she was demented, so that is why I am asking. " , Your SE coordinator IS demented! Agreement means that everyone agrees with EVERYTHING that is written in the document. It does NOT mean that they agree that people who are certified wrote it. (arg! - that may be one of the stupidest things I have ever heard). If you do not agree with EVERYTHING in the IEP, SIGN DISAGREE!!! The sky will not fall...you will simply meet again in 10 school days to introduce other options and work out a compromise/agreement. And...a consensus includes THE PARENT, always, and, when possible, THE STUDENT. nna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.