Guest guest Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 A more balanced look???? They mentioned almost every junk research article out there. I'm surprised she didn't mention bad mothering or the " extreme male " brain theory as well. Isn't it interesting that not a single REAL mercury study was listed say uh like the Palmer study? Arg. A more balanced look at the Joe Barton-autism funding bill controversy Stalled autism bill shows funding rift Advocates want money earmarked, not put in general pot for research JEANNIE KEVER Houston Chronicle November 3, 2006 The Combating Autism Act would dramatically increase research funding, but in the meantime several potentially important - or just controversial - findings have been reported: ..Vanderbilt University researchers say they have identified a genetic mutation that raises the risk of autism and could explain some symptoms. ..Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine discovered that the same gene plays a role in Prader-Willi syndrome, Angelman syndrome and at least some cases of autism. ..A 2004 Institute of Medicine study found no association between autism and the mercury compound formerly used in vaccines but hasn't calmed demands for more research into a possible link. ..An Israeli study reported that the children of men 40 or older were 5.75 times more likely to have an autism spectrum disorder than children of men younger than 30. ..Cornell University economists used precipitation rates, cable-television subscriptions and autism diagnoses to conclude that early-childhood television viewing could trigger autism in genetically susceptible children. In labs across the country, the increasingly vocal demands for more research into the causes and treatment of autism have been a good thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 Hi , Send the writer an email. Kever, Jeannie [ Jeannie.Kever@... ] If you ask her (nicely) to review the Palmer study and others, I bet she will. I received a reply from her (she said there " are still too few answers " ) and she seems open to exploring the issue. We just need to funnel the info to her. _____ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of Singleton Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 2:12 PM To: Texas-Autism-Advocacy Subject: RE: FW: A more balanced look at the Joe Barton-autism funding bill controversy A more balanced look???? They mentioned almost every junk research article out there. I'm surprised she didn't mention bad mothering or the " extreme male " brain theory as well. Isn't it interesting that not a single REAL mercury study was listed say uh like the Palmer study? Arg. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.