Guest guest Posted February 8, 2002 Report Share Posted February 8, 2002 ----- Original Message ----- From: <ilena@...> <Recipient List Suppressed:;> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:59 PM Subject: Welcome to the Tort Claimants Committee website, last updated onFebruary 5, 2002. > http://www.tortcomm.org/ > > Welcome to the Tort Claimants Committee website, last updated on February > 5, 2002. > > Current Events > Updated February 5, 2002: > > Judge Page Hood, the U.S. District Judge overseeing the Dow Corning > bankruptcy case, will hold a status conference on Monday, February 11, > 2002 at 4 p.m. in Detroit. The Tort Claimants' Committee anticipates that > the Court may discuss how the issues on remand to her from the 6th Circuit > Court of Appeals decision will be handled. It is not necessary for > claimants or attorneys to attend, although the hearing is open to > interested parties. The Tort Claimants' Committee will attend the status > conference. We will report and post an update on Tuesday, February 12, > 2002. Please check back to the TCC website at that time. > > The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion on January 29, 2002 > affirming (approving) the Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of Dow > Corning. To read a copy of the opinion, click here. > > The first issue on appeal was whether a bankruptcy court may enjoin > (prevent) objectors from suing a non-debtor corporation (i.e., Dow > Corning's shareholders -- Dow Chemical and Corning) as part of a > reorganization plan in bankruptcy. The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled > that the bankruptcy court may do so, and they affirmed (approved) the > earlier rulings of the bankruptcy and district courts. However, they sent > the case back to the lower court for findings of facts that demonstrate > that an injunction was appropriate in this reorganization plan. This means > that the district court must issue an order that specifically lists the > facts that support her earlier finding that objectors cannot sue a > non-debtor (i.e., Dow Chemical and Corning). > As part of this decision, the appeals court found that the reorganization > plan did not provide adequate protection to ensure that the claims of the > U.S. Government (Class 15) would be paid in full. Specifically, they > determined that a procedural mechanism was needed to allow the U.S. > Government to assert claims for subrogation under Medicare and other > federal programs. > > The second issue on appeal was whether the reorganization plan classified > foreign claimants appropriately. The court ruled that the plan did treat > foreign claimants appropriately and equally with non-foreign claimants > under the bankruptcy code, and affirmed (approved) the earlier rulings of > the bankruptcy and district courts. > The Tort Claimants' Committee will post additional information on the > ruling and other developments as they become available. In the meantime, > Dow Corning has paid the Initial Payment of approximately $1 billion to > the claimants' trust. This money is being invested by the Interim > Financial Advisor and is earning interest dedicated solely for claimants. > Dow Corning does not get any of the interest earned by the claimants' > trust. The Settlement Facility offices are also operational, and a Claims > Assistance Program is available to answer your questions (call toll free > within the U.S. and Canada to 1-866-874-6099). While the ruling by the 6th > Circuit Court of Appeals will undoubtedly cause additional, unexpected > delay in making payments to claimants, the Tort Claimants' Committee will > continue to urge the courts to expedite the appeals and rule quickly. > Unfortunately, we do not control the timing of the court system. > > Please continue to check back to the TCC website for updates. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.