Guest guest Posted January 8, 2008 Report Share Posted January 8, 2008 There is quite a bit of good research on this. Some telling references are copied below. The bottom line: countries that invest in primary care achieve better population health outcomes at lower per capita cost than countries that do not invest in primary care. Caveat (issue that must be addressed in the U.S.): Just spending more on the current primary care delivery system is not likely to achieve significant improvement or savings. Most clinicians are interested in delivering excellent care but believe that they are already doing so, but this assumption is not supported by data. Numerous careful analyses demonstrate gaps so huge that they are in aggregate called " the quality chasm. " What we've been doing in the IMP project: 1: Demonstrating that physicians are willing to engage in serious quality measurement and improvement (once again) 2: That it is possible to measure and improve even in solo and small practices 3: That a curriculum and dissemination strategy exist that reach docs where the live and at a cost that is manageable 4: And that the work results in improved patient experience of care and clinical outcomes An overview: LG, Wasson JH. The Ideal Medical Practice Model: Maximizing Efficiency, Quality, and the Doctor-Patient Relationship. Family Practice Management September 2007 pp. 20-24 We have other articles in the pipeline. We know from the IMP project that the current payment models are inadequate to the work of excellent primary care. We must move beyond volume based payment models that inadequately fund the right work. We are working with interested payers (and always willing to talk with new ones!) to explore new payment demonstrations that support excellent primary care. I'm also interested in exploring payment models that eliminate all the administrative nonsense that is wrapped up in E & M coding, documentation and billing. Gordon References: Bodenheimer, T. Primary care: Will it survive? New England Journal of Medicine, 335;9 Aug 31, 2006, 861-864 Wasson, J. H., , D. J., , R., , J., & MacKenzie, T. A. (2006). Patients report positive impacts of collaborative care. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, July-September 2006 29(3), 199–206. Schoen C., Osborn R., et al. On The Front Lines Of Care: Primary Care Doctors’ Office Systems, Experiences, And Views In Seven Countries Country variations in primary care practices indicate opportunities to learn to improve outcomes and efficiency. Health Affairs Web Exclusive, Nov. 2, 2006 Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, et al. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:273–287. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, et al. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:288–298. Baicker K. Chandra A. Medicare spending, the physician workforce, and beneficiaries' quality of care. Health Affairs. Suppl Web Exclusive:W184-97, 2004. Zastrow RJ, Quadracci L. Engaging Quad/Graphics Employees in the Improvement of Their Health and Healthcare Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 29(3), 227-231 Angrisano C, Farrell D, Kocher B, Laboissiere M, S. Accounting for the Cost of Health Care in the United States. McKinsey Global Institute January 2007 At 04:32 AM 1/8/2008, you wrote: , Does anyone know which scheme gives the best value for health $? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.