Guest guest Posted May 6, 2002 Report Share Posted May 6, 2002 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Ilena Rose " <ilena@...> <Recipient List Suppressed:;> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:52 AM Subject: Silicone Wars ~ Ides of March, 1999 (Re-post) > From: hecate1 <hecate1@...> > > Subject: Re: ~ Silicone Wars ~ Ides of March, 1999 (CORRECTED COPY) > > So timely to repeat this. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Silicone Wars ~ Ides of March, 1999 > > Beware The Ides of March. > > This historical date of classic betrayal and traitorism ~ March 15th ~ > appears to be living up to it's reputation. Caeser and Brutus move over. > Here come The Dows! > > On this date, Dow Corning's bankruptcy division, in yet another public > relations blitz regarding their previously profitable breast implant > division, will begin mailing a couple hundred thousand implant recipients a > settlement offer for their vote. > > They will continue their very expensive PR campaign to make the forgiving > public believe that there is zilch ~ zero ~ nada ~ none ~ no evidence > whatsoever ~ that their previous cash cow of silicone, causes harm. They > will hit the media through their intricate and expansive network with " Poor > Dow " and " Generous Dow " articles. They won't reveal however, that Baby Dow > Corning has earned over $200 million in profit each and every year of their > drawn out bankruptcy. Bankruptcy has indeed served them well. > > Nor will they remind the public that Papa Dow Chemical recently lost $4 > million in Reno and an as yet unknown amount in a class action suit in > Louisiana they have managed to stall. They are guilty of not only > manufacturing, but for years, concealing the known dangers and risks of > breast implants. Mighty Dow, in spite of the Nevada verdict Halloween, > 1995, is still appealing at the federal level. They have lost all state > appeals but with clever legal strategies and stonewalling, that four > million dollars is still in the coffers of Dow, and the very ill plaintiff, > Charlotte Mahlum, is left broke with a debilitating disease similar to > Multple Sclerosis. > > They will fail to mention, that although marketed as " lasting a lifetime, " > recent studies, including one in the prestigious British Lancet (11/22/97), > report a rupture rate up to 95% over 20 years. Nor will the press releases > mention hidden studies done by Dow as early in the 50's and 60's whose > results were buried for years. They did not want their customers to know > that silicone migrated throughout the body and crossed the placental > barrier. They exclude the fact that implants were once designed as a " drug > delivery system, " or that cockroaches dropped dead from the silicone fluid. > > They will try to convince you, that it is out of their generosity, not > scientific evidence, that they are paying out $3.2 billion. They prefer to > be seen as the benevolent, unfairly maligned corporation, who, with no > fault of their own, offer this money out of pure concern for fairness. > > They will utilize their long running campaign of defaming all doctors who > dare to report their findings on the damage to women's bodies and immune > systems by calling them " junk scientists. " They will imply that hundreds of > thousands of implanted women are faking serious autoimmune symptoms and > removing their ruptured implants at the whim of plantiff attorneys. > Preposterous. > > Rarely admitted is the fact that no breast implant has ever been approved > by the FDA for safety. Or why, as of 9/10/98, 127,500 women with silicone > gel implants and an additional 49,661 with saline filled implants had > reported serious adverse reactions to the FDA. > > In 1995, my phone started ringing with women sharing their implant stories > and I began my internet newsgroup and email list. The horrors continue to > unfold today as hundreds more ill women come forward every month. Women > literally and figuratively disintegrating ~ at least one whose tortured > chest is being held together by mesh. Silicone in their brains, their > uteri, their livers, their spinal fluid, their children. The manufacturers > have engaged implanted women as distractors causing confusion and paranoia > throughout the support system, knowing that dividing the injured women > disempowers them. It's as if Brutus himself taught them well to spread > rumors like viruses. > > What about the women? > > With the pittance offered the majority of them, will they even be able to > afford to remove their ruptured or disintegrating implants? > > And if they vote " no, " will a better offer ever come their way? > > Who will cover their mounting medical bills as their immune systems break > down from chemicals and known carcinogens like silica, toluene, and > platinum? Health insurers are already routinely refusing coverage for > implanted women. > > The Silicone Issue is the slippery slope of Big Bu$ine$$. It brings > attention to other dangerous devices and drugs, other toxins whose real > dangers are still being minimized. > > If the wealthy silicone manufacturers don't take real responsibility for > their failed products, this is a public health catastrophe in the making. > > > > > Ilena Rosenthal, is Director of The Humantics Foundation for Women and > author of Breast Implants, The Myths, The Facts the Women. Daily she > communicates with thousands of implanted women and their families via her > email lists. She can be reached at 858/270-0680 ~ ilena@... ~ or > via alt.support.breast-implant. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.