Guest guest Posted May 8, 2002 Report Share Posted May 8, 2002 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Ilena Rose " <ilena@...> <Recipient List Suppressed:;> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: Replacement surgery and silicone gel breast implant rupture:self-report by women after mammoplasty. > ~~~ Thanks Kim ~~~ > > J Womens Health Gend Based Med > > 2002 Apr;11(3):255-64 > > Replacement surgery and silicone gel breast implant rupture: self-report > by women after mammoplasty. > > Brown SL, Pennello G.Epidemiology Branch, Division of Postmarket > Surveillance, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug > Administration, Rockville, land. > > BACKGROUND: > > This study examined the prevalence of revision surgery in which silicone > gel breast implants were either removed (explanted) or replaced in a > cohort of women >from Birmingham, Alabama. The main reason leading up to > the surgery and the prevalence of ruptured implants reported after > explantation are described. > > METHODS: > > Data were collected from telephone interviews with 907 women previously > identified in a larger cohort study of women with breast implants. Women > who reported breast surgeries subsequent to their index mammoplasty were > asked to consent to retrieval of the surgical records describing the > surgery. > > RESULTS: > > Surgery in which a silicone gel breast implant was removed or replaced > was reported by 33% of the 907 women in this cohort. The most common > reason for surgery was problems with the implant that affected the breast > (103 of 303 surgeries). Of the 303 women reporting surgery, 145 (48%) > reported knowing after a surgery that an implant was ruptured when it was > removed, and 171 (56%) reported knowing that an implant was ruptured or > leaking. Overall, 16% of the 907 women reported knowing that either of > their implants was ruptured after any surgery. At least one surgical > record was retrieved for 165 (54%) of the 303 women reporting surgery. > Among these women, the rupture rate was 69 of 165 (42%) according to the > surgical record and 85 of 165 (51.5%) according to self-reports, a > statistically significant difference (p = 0.008 from McNemar's test). The > mean time from implantation to surgery was 11.5 years among women > reporting surgery and estimated at 21.4 years for all women. > > CONCLUSIONS: > > A third of the women in this cohort underwent additional surgery after > the initial mammoplasty, and nearly half who underwent surgery reported > that their implants were found to be ruptured when removed. Women > considering silicone gel breast implants should be informed of the risk > of additional surgeries and of the potential risk of breast implant > rupture.PMID: 11988135 [PubMed - in process] > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.