Guest guest Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 I agree with Kassi on this. I'm far from an expert, but I remember shortly after my grandfather died from glioblastoma they were experimenting with a shot where they take the patient's own cancer cells, modify, then reinject into the site such that the body recognizes that spectific strain of cancer cell & then the immune system begins to attack just the cancer. If I remember the story correctly, back then the cancer cells altered, they tried again, and eventually the patient did die. In these types of " shots " it's not really a vaccine per se, but an immune therapy using own's own cells, very different from taking a few viral/bacterial components, culturing, then injecting into everyone in civilization for decades without regard to contaminants. Perhaps this new therapy might have some downsides, too, but in cases where these women are more than likely gonna die, a good alternative to life could exist! Debi > > If I understand correctly, the newest ones in trials > aren't actual vaccines, that's just the word everyone > uses for a shot now because people are linguistically > lazy. > > It SOUNDS more like a theraputic modality that's more > targeted than chemotherapy. Not something that > everyone would get, but something that they brew up at > enormous cost after someone is diagnosed with a > specific cancer, using their own cells. > > Otherwise they've gone a bit overboard... > > Kassiane > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.