Bull market for clones: studs, not stock

[Guest guest]

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CLONED_MEAT_BREEDERS?SITE=FLDAY & SECTION=HOME & TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Bull market for clones: studs, not stock

By JOELLE TESSLER

AP Business Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The reaction was fast, furious and expected.

Within hours of the government's announcement that milk and meat from

cloned animals was safe, food companies insisted they had no plans to

sell such products and consumer groups said Americans had no plans -or

desires - to eat them.

The response to the Food and Drug Administration's announcement, however,

may prove to be as overblown as it was speedy. Academics and industry

officials say the target market for cloning technology is stud farms and

breeders - not the rank-and-file dairy farms and cattle ranches that

contribute to the nation's food supply.

" The average farmer is not likely to clone animals, " said Terry

Etherton, a professor of animal nutrition at Pennsylvania State

University. " Cloning is not for standard production. "

And with an array of far cheaper reproductive technologies at the ready,

breeders are likely to reserve the pricey cloning techniques for their

most prized and prolific studs.

With costs ranging from $15,000 to $20,000, cloning is just not in the

budget for most farmers, says Leo Timms, a professor in the Department of

Animal Science at Iowa State University.

That's an investment unlikely to pay off for farmers raising animals for

food, Timms added. Even if consumers were comfortable with clone

encounters at the grocery store, he said, " that animal's milk and

meat aren't worth any more than any other animal. "

At the same time, there are plenty of more affordable reproductive

technologies, including artificial insemination and in-vitro

fertilization. The cost of producing an animal using artificial

insemination ranges from $600 to $700, said Faber, president of

Trans Ova Genetics of Sioux Center, Iowa, one of the two main U.S.

cloning companies.

Viagen Inc. and Trans Ova Genetics already have produced more than 600

cloned animals for U.S. breeders, the vast majority cattle, including

copies of prize-winning cows and rodeo bulls.

Breeding the old-fashioned way and via insemination, say proponents,

provides another biological advantage: genetic adaptation.

" You make progress by breeding animals, not cloning them, " said

Galen, a spokesman for the National Milk Producers Federation,

which represents dairy farmers and supports continuing a voluntary

industry moratorium on the sale of products from cloned animals.

" With cloning, you just get a plateau. "

And as reaction to the FDA announcement shows, you also get heightened

ethical and moral concerns.

Consumer groups' objections aren't just about food safety but also

include animal welfare, since many attempts at livestock cloning still

end in fatal birth defects.

" If you have moral objections to a particular food, or ethical

objections to them, FDA's saying, 'Tough, you've got to eat it,' "

said Carol Tucker-Foreman of the Consumer Federation of America, who

pledged to push for more food producers to shun clone-derived

ingredients.

For now, Faber said, his company is targeting its cloning techniques at a

small market of farmers raising elite breeding stock, what he calls

" the rock stars of the barnyard, " not those producing animals

destined for the grocery store.

" Cloning is for breeding, not eating, " he said. " We are

making sons and daughters, semen and embryos, not meat and

milk. "

---

AP Business Writer Perrone contributed to this report.

© 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not

be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our

Privacy Policy.

Don Neeper

Senior Software Engineer

SofTechnics, a METTLER TOLEDO Company

dneeper@...

don.neeper@...

http://www.OhioRawMilk.info/dneeper