RE: Omega 3 was: Cannell on CLO

[Guest guest]

Ron,

FWIW, MT protein types are given A palmitate. CLO only

for carb types. Don't know the reasoning other than

the carb type diet has little A & D comparatively to

liver and fatty fish in the protein diet. Wiley may

have fine tuned 's differentiation of these by

finding through blood plasma Ph drop or increase the

effects of these on the two types. You know, the

better, worse, no benefit,no detriment of MTD.

Personally, I did hold out on A till I found good

palmitate. Take D along with calcium,for calcium

utilization, years of lack, even though D

supplementation isn't in PT list. Don't want to think

about my brain without Trader Joe's omega 3s even

though fatty acids aren't in any metabolic typing

protocols until you get to the most recent research,

Kristal's Nutrition Solution.

As far as Eskimo types, imo, they're all those that

know they are protein types, hypoglycemics, most that

are gluten/dairy intolerant, likely Alzheimer's,

schizophrenia,bipolar and leukemia as has

found.

--- RBJR <rbjr@...> wrote:

>

>

> Boy, my Metabolic Typing alarms are going off

> reading this discussion.

> Perhaps everyone is right? If you are a Protein/Fat

> type Eskimo you

> properly metabolize all the Omega 3 fats you can

> consume but if you are a

> Carb type the same food becomes toxic a la Ray Peat?

> Because if he's

> correct there would be no Eskimos around at all, I

> think.

> Ron

>

> > Why would having a higher PUFA need be protective?

> I'd think

> > exactly the opposite. A higher need for PUFA to

> protect cell

> > membrane fluidity (note that the primary obstacle

> to this

> > hypothesis is NOT indoor living, but

> warm-bloodedness!)

> > would mean more PUFA in the membrane and a higher

> > peroxidizability index of the membrane, and thus

> more

> > oxidative damage if not met by sufficient

> antioxidant capacity.

> > By contrast, if they *don't* need the PUFAs in the

> membrane,

> > they can burn them for energy or store them as

> fat. I would

> > think a PUFA bound in a triglcyeride and stuffed

> inside an

> > adipocyte would be pretty safe from oxidation.

> Ray Peat has

> > said burning PUFA for energy is toxic, and I don't

> know one

> > way or the other about it, but in either case it

> would be an

> > issue of initiating lipid peroxide chain reactions

> in the

> > membrane, so just with respect to the membrane,

> it's safest

> > with a lower need for PUFA, I would think.

> >

> > > IIRC, Stefansson recorded the ages of many elder

> Inuit who were in

> > > their 70's, 80's and 90's. At least that's what

> they told him. But

> > > maybe you are right that they got a lot of vits

> A and D which

> > > protected them from PUFA peroxidation.

> Otherwise, I don't see any

> > > reason to believe their longevity didn't compare

> favorably

> > to the other groups.

> >

> > My recollection, based on a post someone made to

> this list

> > about 2 years ago, is that he used church records.

> On the

> > plus side, with respect to the reliability with

> this memory,

> > is that I remember where I was and which way I was

> facing and

> > whatnot rather photographically when I read it; on

> the minus

> > side, I'm probably unconsciously fabricating half

> the memory

> > and it was, after all, two years ago. An onibasu

> search

> > might be in order.

>

>

>

>

>