Guest guest Posted January 16, 2006 Report Share Posted January 16, 2006 , >>What about SOD itself > >It's not absorbed. Similar problem to taking oral glutathione itself >rather than NAC. Right. I didn't realize what an SOD upregulator was until your explanation in this email, but that is basically what I meant - consuming something that increases the body's production of SOD. > >>plus catalase > >I stupidly forgot to mention catalase. SOD, catalase and glutathione >are the three which need to be carefully balanced because they're all >interrelated. SOD is great, but extra SOD activity yields extra >peroxide, and if there's not enough catalase and glutathione >peroxidase around to turn the peroxide into water directly, some of >the peroxide will go through the Fenton reaction and turn into >hydroxyl radicals, which are extremely potent. > ><http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubm ed & dopt=Abstract & list_uids=7492966 & query_hl=1 & itool=pubmed_docsum> This abstract is suggesting the need for adequate catalase and glutathione peroxidase to reduce H202 from SOD to water, but it doesn't mention anything about having extra glutathione as can be obtained from NAC. So I wonder what would be the problem with extra glutathione, as you suggested in the previous email? >I don't know offhand of any dramatic way to genuinely upregulate >catalase production in the same way that bacopa, for example, >upregulates SOD or even that taking NAC and getting adequate dietary >or supplemental selenium stimulates heightened glutathione peroxidase >production, Well, I do :-) I give Mokie a supplement every day that upregulates SOD, glutathione peroxidase, catalase and methionine reductase. But you don't like the supplement for other reasons, at least you mentioned as much when I posted about it. I actually give her a combo of two products that upregulate these things - AOX/PLX (concentrate from wheat sprouts) and I-Plex (concentrate from broccoil sprouts). My brother has given AOX for years to his dog with spondylosis and now gives I-Plex because it's a newer product from the same company that is supposed to be more potent. Both of us feel these supplements have played a major role in our dogs' longevity and relative youthfulness (His dog is a wolf/GSD cross and is about 11 yrs old and mine's a minpin that's 15 yrs old). His dog was supposed to be dead about 6 years ago according to his vet, but I got him started on another SOD product back then, plus fish oil (before I knew about the problems with fish oil), then a couple of years later I convinced him to switch to AOX/PLX. There's a noticable difference in the dog's mobility if he lowers the dose. In any event, here's the write-up from the manufacturer on how it works. And BTW, it was first formulated to help victims of the Chernobyl disaster. And it was found that it reduced the affects of radiation damage on the survivors. http://www.biotecfoods.com/usa/products/aoxplx.htm " AOX/PLXT is a proprietary blend of flavone rich sprouts grown specifically to increase the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase and catalase, and combined with a special selenioorganic enzyme mimic which increases glutathione peroxidase activity in our bodies. AOX/PLXT is cGMP manufactured under strictly controlled conditions (temperature, humidity, light, etc.), and processed with minimal heat to ensure the bioavailability of the flavones which result in increased production of the targeted antioxidant enzymes. Some research indicates that heat destroys these critical precursors or signaling molecules. Therefore, our products are even tableting using a slow, low heat process. The result is a concentrated blend of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and Methionine Reductase. (MET). When tested, AOX/PLXT has consistently shown significant increases in glutathione peroxidase activity endogenously. In addition, endogenous increases in SOD and CAT levels in humans and animals has been hypothesized, tested and confirmed by independent, published works in renown scientific journals including " The Journal of Free Radical Biology and Medicine. " Research suggests that the antioxidant enzyme AOX/PLXT increases, is only accomplished by in conjunction with specific interaction with intestinal micro flora (See Citation 1), and perhaps even more importantly, by stimulating or signaling one's own SOD3 gene internally production of these antioxidant enzymes. (See Citations at 2, 3, 4) This is particularly significant given that other oral forms of commercially available superoxide dismutase (normally bovine liver extracts), like any other large protein, cannot be absorbed or used by the mitochondria,5 and is most likely broken down during digestion without contributing significantly to intercellular SOD levels. " but adequate dietary iron is certainly required -- which >has had me wondering what the influence of lactoferrin on catalase >production is. Dunno, but an interesting question. > >I think selenium is also important for producing catalase, and copper >and zinc and manganese are required for SOD, so getting enough >minerals is obviously important. Yes. > >>and methionine reductase? > >I'm less familiar with that one, but my understanding is that it's >more of a specialized antioxidant as compared to the fundamental >pillars of antioxidant functionality which SOD, catalase and >glutathione are. The link above says it removes the hydroxyl radical which is often associated with heavy metal poisoning, radiation and industrial pollution. I used to have a link with a great chart about the interactions of all these antioxidant enzymes that showed the byproducts of each and which other ones reduced those byproducts but the links are now dead unfortunately. But I thought I remembered that the hydroxyl radical was somehow involved in the network, not just in association with MR. > >>I guess I'm just not clear on why just an SOD >>upregulator and glutathione would constitute a " balanced " antioxidant >>system. > >I was careless with my wording. It's not that those two by >themselves encompass balancing all antioxidant activity. It's that >SOD, catalase and glutathione are extremely powerful -- much more so >than many other antioxidants -- and there's an important reason to >balance catalase and glutathione with SOD so that the Fenton reaction >doesn't wind up screwing you over with lots of OH-. It's a lot >easier to boost glutathione than it is to boost catalase AFAIK, so >that's what I mentioned. I thought you'd wind up with a lot of H202 not the hydroxyl radical since SOD reduces super oxide to H202? In any event, methionine reductase to the resuce for the OH-! > >>And what exactly is an SOD-upregulator? > >Something that boosts the body's production of superoxide dismutase. D'oh! I shoulda figured. > >>I'm currently take NAC for my liver, so I'm very interested in your >>information on this. > >It's all over the net -- well-established. E.g.: ><http://www.wholehealthmd.com/refshelf/substances_view/1,1525,809,00.html> No, I know what NAC does, that's why I'm taking it! I was interested in what you were saying about balancing it out with an SOD upregulator as I'd never heard the term before so thought I might be missing some important piece of info. >>Bacopa seems >>like the only non-drug SOD-upregulator. Is that correct? > >AFAIK, though I guess it depends on whether you'd call adequate >supplies of necessary ingredients an " upregulator " . Now that I know what an SOD upregulator is I wouldn't bother with Bacopa since it only boosts SOD, I'll stick with my comprehensive AOX and I-Plex. > >Speaking of which, SOD is another one of those bloody single terms >for multiple items. Offhand I'm not positive about exactly how many >forms of SOD there are, but I think there are two: the mitochondrial >form, which uses manganese, and the cellular form, which uses >copper and zinc. I don't know much about the different forms other than that they are dependent on different minerals as you've mentioned. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.