Guest guest Posted April 19, 2011 Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 The US will still get much of the blame for it all though. Of course what is interesting is that while England is thinking about sending troops into yet another combat theater, the politicians are cutting troops and military spending. Obama wants to cut military spending as well but step up operations, just like Clinton did. I've been watching Nigeria, which is a major oil exporter to the US. A Christian won what the UN called a fair election but the Muslims in the northern part of the country are going nuts burning churches and murdering people. Not hearing much about that in the news though. In a message dated 4/19/2011 1:35:40 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, no_reply writes: But the advanatge is that no longer can anyone claim that the US is a warmonger. Now Britain will assume the title and all that comes therefrom, including accusations of neo-imperialism.France too, considering their involvement in Libya and the Ivory Coast.Administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 We tried that once and but for some bad luck we would have won. The question is if we would have absorbed the Canadian states or let them go their own way or even given them back to England. Can we invade Canada now? It has better weather than some countries the US has invaded. :PSent from my iPhone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 Really amusing! (BUT seriously, when we first moved to Alberta from Ontario, (1970's) there was a vocal Western Separatist movement, We were both concerned enough that if Canada become embroiled in civil war over Western Separatism, we would have fled to USA (less than 100 miles South) and sought political asylum. We did not forsee a good outcome if red-neck bigoted separatists took over. (my husband was a pasifist due to religious beliefs, I was undecided but did not like the idea of becoming involved in civil war against my neighbors who were ideologically in support of Western Separatism.) When I was griwing up, a militant form of Quebec Sepaeratism casue dmajor problems in Canada. rl 'My cat Rusty is a servant of the Living God....' adapted from a poem by Smart Subject: Re: Re: Cameron will not rule out role for British ground ...To: FAMSecretSociety Received: Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 5:56 PM We tried that once and but for some bad luck we would have won. The question is if we would have absorbed the Canadian states or let them go their own way or even given them back to England. Can we invade Canada now? It has better weather than some countries the US has invaded. :PSent from my iPhone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2011 Report Share Posted April 21, 2011 The attacks against Canada mainly failed due to back luck and a couple of bad leaders. It would have been interesting to see how that played out had the attacks been successful. I remember those secessionist movements, mainly in Quebec. There are some such movements in the US. Some of the Northeastern States have threatened to secede a few times, but most of the rest are things like Long Island wanting to break away from NYC. Northern California has made noise about splitting from the southern part of the state. I've heard that a few other states have thought about breaking away and not just in the South. Really amusing! (BUT seriously, when we first moved to Alberta from Ontario, (1970's) there was a vocal Western Separatist movement, We were both concerned enough that if Canada become embroiled in civil war over Western Separatism, we would have fled to USA (less than 100 miles South) and sought political asylum. We did not forsee a good outcome if red-neck bigoted separatists took over. (my husband was a pasifist due to religious beliefs, I was undecided but did not like the idea of becoming involved in civil war against my neighbors who were ideologically in support of Western Separatism.) When I was griwing up, a militant form of Quebec Sepaeratism casue dmajor problems in Canada. rl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2011 Report Share Posted April 21, 2011 The attacks against Canada mainly failed due to back luck and a couple of bad leaders. It would have been interesting to see how that played out had the attacks been successful. I remember those secessionist movements, mainly in Quebec. There are some such movements in the US. Some of the Northeastern States have threatened to secede a few times, but most of the rest are things like Long Island wanting to break away from NYC. Northern California has made noise about splitting from the southern part of the state. I've heard that a few other states have thought about breaking away and not just in the South. Really amusing! (BUT seriously, when we first moved to Alberta from Ontario, (1970's) there was a vocal Western Separatist movement, We were both concerned enough that if Canada become embroiled in civil war over Western Separatism, we would have fled to USA (less than 100 miles South) and sought political asylum. We did not forsee a good outcome if red-neck bigoted separatists took over. (my husband was a pasifist due to religious beliefs, I was undecided but did not like the idea of becoming involved in civil war against my neighbors who were ideologically in support of Western Separatism.) When I was griwing up, a militant form of Quebec Sepaeratism casue dmajor problems in Canada. rl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.