Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Israel warns Palestinians all deals are off if UN vote goes ahead

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/17/avigdor-lieberman-palestinians-un-os\

lo

Israel warns Palestinians all deals are off if UN vote goes ahead

Foreign minister says past deals such as the Oslo accord will be threatened by

efforts towards UN recognition of Palestinian state

Harriet Sherwood in Jerusalem guardian.co.uk, Friday 17 June 2011 15.46 BST

Israel will renounce past agreements made with the Palestinians if they press

ahead with unilateral plans to seek recognition of a Palestinian state at the

UN, foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman has said.

" A move like that will be a violation of all the agreements that were signed

until today, " Lieberman told the EU foreign policy chief, Ashton, in

Jerusalem. " Israel will no longer be committed to the agreements signed with the

Palestinians in the past 18 years. "

The principal agreement referred to is the Oslo accords, signed in September

1993, under which the Palestinian Authority (PA) was created with responsibility

for administering parts of the West Bank and Gaza.

Lieberman's comments further raise the stakes in the run up to the UN general

assembly in September, at which a majority of the 192 countries are expected to

back a Palestinian state. Israel and the US are fiercely opposed to such a move

and pressure is being applied to the Palestinians to abandon their approach.

Ashton is visiting Jerusalem and the West Bank in an attempt to break the

impasse in negotiations between the two sides. Talks collapsed last September

after Israel refused to extend a temporary and partial freeze on settlement

construction.

In May Barack Obama publicly backed the creation of a Palestinian state based on

the pre-1967 borders, with agreed land swaps, as an outcome of talks. The US

president's move angered the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, who

wants to retain the large settlement blocks in the West Bank. Obama's speech was

intended to hold out the prospect of a negotiated alternative to the

Palestinians' unilateral plan.

The Israelis say they are ready to resume negotiations on the basis of the

Palestinians recognising Israel as a Jewish state. The Palestinians reject this

on the grounds it pre-empts talks on the right of return of Palestinian

refugees.

Lieberman, a hawkish member of the Israeli coalition government, said on Friday:

" In light of [PA President Mahmoud] Abbas's current stance, the chances for

negotiations are zero ... Israel is prepared to renew negotiations. The ball is

in the Palestinians' court. "

Israel has launched a global campaign through its embassies against the

Palestinian move to garner support for its state ahead of the UN meeting. It is

particularly worried about the position of European countries.

Cameron indicated to Netanyahu in London last month that Britain might

back a Palestinian state if there was no substantial progress in negotiations.

Germany and Italy have said they will oppose the Palestinians' move. France's

position is thought to be similar to the UK's although it is trying to broker a

peace conference as an alternative.

The US is expected to vote against the Palestinian move, and to use its veto in

the UN security council over a Palestinian application for membership of the UN.

It is applying pressure on Abbas and his officials to rethink their strategy.

However, Palestinian negotiator Muhammad Shtayeh told journalists on Thursday

that the Palestinian Authority would press ahead with seeking recognition and

membership of the UN regardless of whether talk resume.

" We are by all means going to the United Nations, whether there are negotiations

or no negotiations, " he said. " We think that is not either/or. We think that

going to the United Nations and negotiations can go hand in hand and they are

complementary to each other. "

Both the Palestinians and the Israelis were focusing on the stance of European

countries, he said. " For us and the Israelis the battle is over Europe because

the issue is not how many states, the issue is also quality states, with all

respect to everybody, " he said.

A spokesman for Ashton said: " It is more urgent than ever to engage in

meaningful negotiations and move the peace process forward ... What is needed is

a clear reference framework to allow both sides to return to the negotiating

table. "

Ashton had called for a new meeting of the Middle East quartet, comprising the

EU, US, Russia and the UN, to discuss the issues, he added.

If the Palestinian Authority was dismantled Israel would be obliged under

international law to assume full responsibility for the administration of all

the territory it has occupied since 1967.

Meanwhile the Turkish humanitarian organisation IHH has announced it is pulling

out of the flotilla of ships taking aid to Gaza later this month after the

Turkish authorities refused to give permission for the Mavi Marmara to sail.

Nine Turkish activists were killed on board the Mavi Marmara a year ago when

Israeli commandos stormed on board in an attempt to prevent it breaching

Israel's sea embargo around Gaza.

Other organisations participating in this year's flotilla have said they will go

ahead without the IHH.

A senior Israeli military official has said the navy will stop the flotilla,

using force if necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...