Re: Re: Updates to www.rife.de

[Guest guest]

>When it comes to the damped wave spark gap that Dr. Rife used we do

>not know if it had any effect on the organism.

The Oscilloclast of Dr. Abrams administered a damped wave. From all

reports, it appeared to have such an effect. Rife himself endorsed

it. We know what frequencies he used; only about 10 in all. It would

be relatively straightforward to try them as different waveforms and

see if this is a factor. The key advantage of a damped wave is that

it is highly inductive due to its instantaneous rise in voltage.

Again, the efficiency of a sharp hammer blow. In general, a

rectilinear waveform is always more forceful then a sinewave. This

applies equally to living cells; a fact well known to those

researching cellular and cordless phone health issues.

>There is a

>possibility that Rife converted the sine wave out of the Kennedy 110

>to a damped wave but this is still only speculation.

Your article, Jeff, seems to confirm the tube was ionized by a signal

of around 1 MHz ( spark gap) fed in parallel with the MOR. In

support, there is also the quote by Crane about the efficacy of sharp

pulses and Rife's film of the waveform itself.

In any event, this would certainly improve impedance matching,

particularly at lower frequencies. That may have been Rife's original

rationale. It could also explain why no variable matching network is

apparent. Then something clicked. In conjunction with the MOR, it

also ruptured bacteria. That's my speculation. Given the

aforementioned characteristics of this type of waveform, it is quite plausible.

>We know that

>each organism had its own specific frequency and the spark gap was a

>set frequency, so the MOR frequency was the kill frequency. This is

>why I say we do not know for sure that the spark gap did anything to

>the organism.

Here is a way to think of what the damped wave might do. Imagine a

wine glass subjected to its resonant frequency. It is already

vibrating and weakened. You then tap it with a hammer. This

precipitates it shattering. The rate of the tapping need not be

related to the resonance itself. A biological analogy is " cellular

stress response " . The following paper demonstrates this occuring to

E. coli bacteria at 1 MHz, the frequency under discussion.

http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/64/10/3927

>I personal do not think it did anything because

>Hoyland managed to use a modulated sine wave to produce the MOR

>effect.

But, as I understand, we do not know what the resulting waveform was.

It may have incorporated a sharp rise time similar to the damped

wave. As you point out, a squarewave (or reversed sawtooth) may have

similar characteristics.

>This is where testing will have to be done. I think a damped

>waveform is the first thing that should be tested.

It would be nice to think this will work with pads. The Oscilloclast

did. But we should keep in mind how damped wave energized plasma

differs. Acoustic-like shock waves result, as well as heterodyning

with MOR and its harmonics. These all may have been contributing

factors to the Rife effect. Having said this, it makes perfect sense

to begin with the simplest and cheapest option and work up from there.

Nielsen

[Guest guest]

,

This is a very good analogy. Abrams certainly gated his Oscilloclast

transmitter's output. It is thought by some that Rife also used a similar

gate effect - such shows itself in the British Rife Groups device.

Everyone seems to be overlooking electrokinetic effects and how these can

affect the cells by conversion of an electrical signal into an acoustic

signal ( i.e mechanical resonance - ultrasound).

Jim Bare

>Here is a way to think of what the damped wave might do. Imagine a

>wine glass subjected to its resonant frequency. It is already

>vibrating and weakened. You then tap it with a hammer. This

>precipitates it shattering. The rate of the tapping need not be

>related to the resonance itself. A biological analogy is " cellular

>stress response " . The following paper demonstrates this occuring to

>E. coli bacteria at 1 MHz, the frequency under discussion.

>

> >

[Guest guest]

,

This is a very good analogy. Abrams certainly gated his Oscilloclast

transmitter's output. It is thought by some that Rife also used a similar

gate effect - such shows itself in the British Rife Groups device.

Everyone seems to be overlooking electrokinetic effects and how these can

affect the cells by conversion of an electrical signal into an acoustic

signal ( i.e mechanical resonance - ultrasound).

Jim Bare

>Here is a way to think of what the damped wave might do. Imagine a

>wine glass subjected to its resonant frequency. It is already

>vibrating and weakened. You then tap it with a hammer. This

>precipitates it shattering. The rate of the tapping need not be

>related to the resonance itself. A biological analogy is " cellular

>stress response " . The following paper demonstrates this occuring to

>E. coli bacteria at 1 MHz, the frequency under discussion.

>

> >