Re: Updates to www.rife.de

[Guest guest]

>History of Rife's Instruments - Updated

><http://www.rife.de/history_of_rife_instruments.html>http://www.rife.de/history\

_of_rife_instruments.html

That all makes sense. Here's what I read into it. The squarewave was

adopted to replace the harmonic spread provided by the original

plasma tube. Its fast rise time would also approximate the

inductivity of a damped wave. The classic MOR was never, of itself,

responsible for cell rupture. That was triggered by the impact of the

1MHz damped wave once the cell was resonating. Its fixed frequency

also mitigated the need for a variable matching circuit between the

amp and the tube.

Thanks to Jeff Garff and his associates, the exact frequencies and

waveforms Rife used can now be replicated with an arbitrary wave

generator and tested in pad mode. Preferably with a wideband amp. Of

course, that's the high end option.

Here is a possible alternative. Not to overdo the Velleman theme, but

their previously mentioned PCGU 1000 function generator has a damped

waveform as one of its presets. So, if you buy two, the latter could

be set to 1MHz, and the other FG to 1.604MHz triangle or square. Just

mix the outputs externally. Is the 10V output enough? That remains to be seen.

I simulated the above in CoolEdit 2000 with a 1604Hz squarewave and

1000Hz sawtooth. Using this technique, and spectrum analysis

software, it is easy to observe how various waveforms enhance or

diminish the harmonic content.

Nielsen

[Guest guest]

Hello ,

When it comes to the damped wave spark gap that Dr. Rife used we do

not know if it had any effect on the organism. There is a

possibility that Rife converted the sine wave out of the Kennedy 110

to a damped wave but this is still only speculation. We know that

each organism had its own specific frequency and the spark gap was a

set frequency, so the MOR frequency was the kill frequency. This is

why I say we do not know for sure that the spark gap did anything to

the organism. I personal do not think it did anything because

Hoyland managed to use a modulated sine wave to produce the MOR

effect. This is where testing will have to be done. I think a damped

waveform is the first thing that should be tested. A square wave

would also be a logical test that should be made. There are still a

few things that need to be worked out. Some B coli and a microscope

should answer the remaining questions. We plan on working on this

later this spring. Anyone else that would like to do this should

feel free to jump in and help. If we can kill some B coli the way

Rife did we will then know exactly what Rife was doing? Rife's

method will then be known.

Best wishes

Jeff Garff

>

>

> >History of Rife's Instruments - Updated

>

><http://www.rife.de/history_of_rife_instruments.html>http://www.rife

..de/history_of_rife_instruments.html

>

>

> That all makes sense. Here's what I read into it. The squarewave

was

> adopted to replace the harmonic spread provided by the original

> plasma tube. Its fast rise time would also approximate the

> inductivity of a damped wave. The classic MOR was never, of

itself,

> responsible for cell rupture. That was triggered by the impact of

the

> 1MHz damped wave once the cell was resonating. Its fixed frequency

> also mitigated the need for a variable matching circuit between

the

> amp and the tube.

>

> Thanks to Jeff Garff and his associates, the exact frequencies and

> waveforms Rife used can now be replicated with an arbitrary wave

> generator and tested in pad mode. Preferably with a wideband amp.

Of

> course, that's the high end option.

>

> Here is a possible alternative. Not to overdo the Velleman theme,

but

> their previously mentioned PCGU 1000 function generator has a

damped

> waveform as one of its presets. So, if you buy two, the latter

could

> be set to 1MHz, and the other FG to 1.604MHz triangle or square.

Just

> mix the outputs externally. Is the 10V output enough? That remains

to be seen.

>

> I simulated the above in CoolEdit 2000 with a 1604Hz squarewave

and

> 1000Hz sawtooth. Using this technique, and spectrum analysis

> software, it is easy to observe how various waveforms enhance or

> diminish the harmonic content.

>

> Nielsen

>