Guest guest Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Hi , I have tried those frequencies ( 11.228 Mhz and 17.644 Mhz) using the Icom-718 and a 4 " helium phanotron tube. The tube was 12 " away and the power was nearly 75 watts. I did not get any results with two very bad off people with cancer. Of course there are no spikes in the wave forms of this setup, It's all very pure sine. I also tried audio modulating the Icom while doing this with 2007 and 2008 Hz. A.J. _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 Hi A.J.: Thanks for this report. I would think that the ICOM might not be the best setup to test these frequencies, especially if there are no spikes in the waveform. Your lack of results is very interesting nonetheless. It might be an indication that the frequency of 1604 kHz is the actual MOR that Rife was getting his results with and not a higher harmonic. Needless to say, this needs further investigation. Regards, --- wrote: > > Hi , > I have tried those frequencies ( 11.228 Mhz and > 17.644 Mhz) using the Icom-718 and a 4 " helium > phanotron tube. The tube was 12 " away and the power > was nearly 75 watts. > I did not get any results with two very bad off > people with cancer. > Of course there are no spikes in the wave forms of > this setup, It's all very pure sine. I also tried > audio modulating the Icom while doing this with 2007 > and 2008 Hz. > A.J. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 The 1604 khz is a frequency related to what was called the BX virus, correct? Perhaps then, we should not label it as " *the* cancer virus " , because there are a number of viruses that can cause cancer. Some however seem worse than others. We may want to consider a retrovirus named " avian leukosis virus " as a candidate for Rife's BX virus, because of the wide variation of important oncogenes it is capable of activating. The fact that it is called " avian " should not fool us into believing that it cannot influence mammalian cells, because it can and does. It is only called avian because it originally comes from chickens etc. One strain of it in particular is considered a serious cancer virus. Virginia Livingston-Wheeler also believed years ago, that poultry was an original source of cancer. However, at this time it would be wise to keep an open mind about what virus might or might not be the BX. Chicken flocks that produce eggs for vaccines are supposed to be certified free of avian leukosis virus. Supposed to be. The fact that Rife had to find special procedures to culture and ultimately find the BX (including radiation from the loop of plasma tube), also is suspicious for it being a retrovirus. Best wishes, Char www.dnafrequencies.com ___________________________________ > Hi A.J.: > > Thanks for this report. I would think that the ICOM > might not be the best setup to test these frequencies, > especially if there are no spikes in the waveform. > Your lack of results is very interesting nonetheless. > It might be an indication that the frequency of 1604 > kHz is the actual MOR that Rife was getting his > results with and not a higher harmonic. Needless to > say, this needs further investigation. > > Regards, > > > > --- wrote: > > > Hi , > > I have tried those frequencies ( 11.228 Mhz and > > 17.644 Mhz) using the Icom-718 and a 4 " helium > > phanotron tube. The tube was 12 " away and the power > > was nearly 75 watts. > > I did not get any results with two very bad off > > people with cancer. > > Of course there are no spikes in the wave forms of > > this setup, It's all very pure sine. I also tried > > audio modulating the Icom while doing this with 2007 > > and 2008 Hz. > > A.J. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2008 Report Share Posted April 18, 2008 What I also meant to add in summary, was that even though there were no results for the people with cancer that AJ mentioned used 1.604 Mhz, there are a number of factors to consider. 1 - the wrong cancer virus may have been targeted 2 - the 1.604 Mhz may not be optimal (i.e., we are still testing theories regarding Rife's frequencies) 3 - the cancers may not have been initially caused or initiated by a virus (there are other causative factors, such as chemicals and radiation) 4 - the cancers may have been too advanced We should keep a very open mind, not jump to conclusions too quickly based on any one or two cases, keep testing in whatever ways possible, and keep an eye open for patterns of results. Cancer is a very difficult and complex condition on which to build/prove theory; it would be easier to test conditions proven to be directly caused by specific pathogens, to prove theory. Nonetheless, there is a lot of interest in cancer, and people will do what they can. Best wishes, Char www.dnafrequencies.com ____________________________ > Hi A.J.: > > Thanks for this report. I would think that the ICOM > might not be the best setup to test these frequencies, > especially if there are no spikes in the waveform. > Your lack of results is very interesting nonetheless. > It might be an indication that the frequency of 1604 > kHz is the actual MOR that Rife was getting his > results with and not a higher harmonic. Needless to > say, this needs further investigation. > > Regards, > > > > --- wrote: > > > Hi , > > I have tried those frequencies ( 11.228 Mhz and > > 17.644 Mhz) using the Icom-718 and a 4 " helium > > phanotron tube. The tube was 12 " away and the power > > was nearly 75 watts. > > I did not get any results with two very bad off > > people with cancer. > > Of course there are no spikes in the wave forms of > > this setup, It's all very pure sine. I also tried > > audio modulating the Icom while doing this with 2007 > > and 2008 Hz. > > A.J. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.