Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

RE: Harmonics of Rife's BX frequency

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi ,

I have tried those frequencies ( 11.228 Mhz and 17.644 Mhz) using the Icom-718

and a 4 " helium phanotron tube. The tube was 12 " away and the power was nearly

75 watts.

I did not get any results with two very bad off people with cancer.

Of course there are no spikes in the wave forms of this setup, It's all very

pure sine. I also tried audio modulating the Icom while doing this with 2007 and

2008 Hz.

A.J.

_______________________________________________

Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com

The most personalized portal on the Web!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi A.J.:

Thanks for this report. I would think that the ICOM

might not be the best setup to test these frequencies,

especially if there are no spikes in the waveform.

Your lack of results is very interesting nonetheless.

It might be an indication that the frequency of 1604

kHz is the actual MOR that Rife was getting his

results with and not a higher harmonic. Needless to

say, this needs further investigation.

Regards,

--- wrote:

>

> Hi ,

> I have tried those frequencies ( 11.228 Mhz and

> 17.644 Mhz) using the Icom-718 and a 4 " helium

> phanotron tube. The tube was 12 " away and the power

> was nearly 75 watts.

> I did not get any results with two very bad off

> people with cancer.

> Of course there are no spikes in the wave forms of

> this setup, It's all very pure sine. I also tried

> audio modulating the Icom while doing this with 2007

> and 2008 Hz.

> A.J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The 1604 khz is a frequency related to what was called the BX virus,

correct? Perhaps then, we should not label it as " *the* cancer virus " ,

because there are a number of viruses that can cause cancer.

Some however seem worse than others. We may want to consider a retrovirus

named " avian leukosis virus " as a candidate for Rife's BX virus, because of

the wide variation of important oncogenes it is capable of activating. The

fact that it is called " avian " should not fool us into believing that it

cannot influence mammalian cells, because it can and does. It is only

called avian because it originally comes from chickens etc. One strain of

it in particular is considered a serious cancer virus. Virginia

Livingston-Wheeler also believed years ago, that poultry was an original

source of cancer. However, at this time it would be wise to keep an open

mind about what virus might or might not be the BX.

Chicken flocks that produce eggs for vaccines are supposed to be certified

free of avian leukosis virus. Supposed to be.

The fact that Rife had to find special procedures to culture and ultimately

find the BX (including radiation from the loop of plasma tube), also is

suspicious for it being a retrovirus.

Best wishes,

Char

www.dnafrequencies.com

___________________________________

> Hi A.J.:

>

> Thanks for this report. I would think that the ICOM

> might not be the best setup to test these frequencies,

> especially if there are no spikes in the waveform.

> Your lack of results is very interesting nonetheless.

> It might be an indication that the frequency of 1604

> kHz is the actual MOR that Rife was getting his

> results with and not a higher harmonic. Needless to

> say, this needs further investigation.

>

> Regards,

>

>

>

> --- wrote:

>

> > Hi ,

> > I have tried those frequencies ( 11.228 Mhz and

> > 17.644 Mhz) using the Icom-718 and a 4 " helium

> > phanotron tube. The tube was 12 " away and the power

> > was nearly 75 watts.

> > I did not get any results with two very bad off

> > people with cancer.

> > Of course there are no spikes in the wave forms of

> > this setup, It's all very pure sine. I also tried

> > audio modulating the Icom while doing this with 2007

> > and 2008 Hz.

> > A.J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

What I also meant to add in summary, was that even though there were no

results for the people with cancer that AJ mentioned used 1.604 Mhz, there

are a number of factors to consider.

1 - the wrong cancer virus may have been targeted

2 - the 1.604 Mhz may not be optimal (i.e., we are still testing theories

regarding Rife's frequencies)

3 - the cancers may not have been initially caused or initiated by a virus

(there are other causative factors, such as chemicals and radiation)

4 - the cancers may have been too advanced

We should keep a very open mind, not jump to conclusions too quickly based

on any one or two cases, keep testing in whatever ways possible, and keep an

eye open for patterns of results. Cancer is a very difficult and complex

condition on which to build/prove theory; it would be easier to test

conditions proven to be directly caused by specific pathogens, to prove

theory. Nonetheless, there is a lot of interest in cancer, and people will

do what they can.

Best wishes,

Char

www.dnafrequencies.com

____________________________

> Hi A.J.:

>

> Thanks for this report. I would think that the ICOM

> might not be the best setup to test these frequencies,

> especially if there are no spikes in the waveform.

> Your lack of results is very interesting nonetheless.

> It might be an indication that the frequency of 1604

> kHz is the actual MOR that Rife was getting his

> results with and not a higher harmonic. Needless to

> say, this needs further investigation.

>

> Regards,

>

>

>

> --- wrote:

>

> > Hi ,

> > I have tried those frequencies ( 11.228 Mhz and

> > 17.644 Mhz) using the Icom-718 and a 4 " helium

> > phanotron tube. The tube was 12 " away and the power

> > was nearly 75 watts.

> > I did not get any results with two very bad off

> > people with cancer.

> > Of course there are no spikes in the wave forms of

> > this setup, It's all very pure sine. I also tried

> > audio modulating the Icom while doing this with 2007

> > and 2008 Hz.

> > A.J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...