Guest guest Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 Hi, here is a question that was recently put to me and which I want to find a consensus on. Providing money was not an issue, what would we need to scientifically confirm the frequencies and methods used by Rife, today? I will start this off with my ideas. First of all for in-vitro scientific research: 1. An Ergonom 4000-3 microscope as a modern day equivalent of the Rife microscope with video recording capabilities to document the process. http://www.grayfieldoptical.com/ergonom_4000-3.html 2. Suitable heated chambers where the pathogens can be cultured and viewed at high magnifications without staining or other destructive methods required. Such chambers would require the ability to apply frequencies either electrically, or via plasma tube. http://www.grayfieldoptical.com/chambers.html 2. A medical lab to conduct the experiments in a country when such work would be allowed (NOT the USA for example) 3. Professionally trained microscopists and doctors 4. Access to live pathogens that could be cultured and viewed under the microscope. 5. Suitable frequency equipment which can generate the frequencies (which device would be the most suitable)? 6. Time to perform this research. How long is it felt would be necessary to obtain scientifically significant results? Once the in-vitro research was completed, in-vivo research could be performed with animals and human subjects. Please list what you guys feel would be necessary to do this research. let me know what you guys think is necessary and I would like to see a consensus. I have my reasons for asking this now .... Regards Moderator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.