Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Should we be worried?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

See: http://truerife.com/egbt.pdf for a revised version of the glucose blocking

protocol.

 

www.truerife.com

Subject: Should we be worried?

To: Rife

Date: Monday, August 18, 2008, 6:51 PM

Hi,

Just out of curiosity i started searching through all the

TV,Radio,Marine etc etc frequency listings the other evening to see if

any of them were close to the frequency used by Dr Holt,434Mhz, to

" sensitize " Cancer cells prior to treatment. I came across this link

http://www.tvtower. com/Commercial% 20Television% 20Frequencies. html in

which i found that Channel 59 (BBC)of the UK Cable TV network operates

at 433.25 Mhz - 437.75 Mhz the first being the sound " carrier " & the

second the video " carrier " .I believe that since around 1974 Dr Holt

has successfully used 434Mhz to " wake up " cancer cells to a hostile

environment of Glucose starvation & bombardment with low dosage X-rays

which the Cancer cells are particularly unhappy about & promptly die!

What immediately sprang to mind was this- If we are surrounded by

Radio waves " hovering " around this frequency every time we sit down in

front of the TV, are we unknowingly partaking in " Radio wave therapy "

without receiving the beneficial secondary parts of the treatment?

Is it any wonder Dr Holt has struggled as he has to bring this CURE

to the forefront of Cancer treatment as he has? Billion dollar drug

companies & TV aswell!

Anyway,should we be worried? I am.

Ady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every radio frequency (in the US anyway) is allocated to someone or

some use, and almost all have a transmitter running somewhere all the

time. We do indeed live in a sea of RF, at very low power levels.

What this means to me is that if simply being exposed to a certain

frequency kills things, then we'd all be dead! It takes a certain

amount of power for destructive effects.

I'm confused by your last line. What are you worried about?

Mike

Monday, August 18, 2008, 6:51:56 PM, you wrote:

as> Hi,

as> Just out of curiosity i started searching through all the

as> TV,Radio,Marine etc etc frequency listings the other evening to see if

as> any of them were close to the frequency used by Dr Holt,434Mhz, to

as> " sensitize " Cancer cells prior to treatment. I came across this link

as> http://www.tvtower.com/Commercial%20Television%20Frequencies.html in

as> which i found that Channel 59 (BBC)of the UK Cable TV network operates

as> at 433.25 Mhz - 437.75 Mhz the first being the sound " carrier " & the

as> second the video " carrier " .I believe that since around 1974 Dr Holt

as> has successfully used 434Mhz to " wake up " cancer cells to a hostile

as> environment of Glucose starvation & bombardment with low dosage X-rays

as> which the Cancer cells are particularly unhappy about & promptly die!

as> What immediately sprang to mind was this- If we are surrounded by

as> Radio waves " hovering " around this frequency every time we sit down in

as> front of the TV, are we unknowingly partaking in " Radio wave therapy "

as> without receiving the beneficial secondary parts of the treatment?

as> Is it any wonder Dr Holt has struggled as he has to bring this CURE

as> to the forefront of Cancer treatment as he has? Billion dollar drug

as> companies & TV aswell!

as> Anyway,should we be worried? I am.

as> Ady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Hi,

After a bit more searching i came across this

link/site/product- http://www.quasarelectronics.co.uk/30a17.htm

Dr Holts favorite frequency to activate & " sensitize " cancer cells

prior to Glucose blocking & more successful X-ray treatment is 434mhz,

what i'm worried about is the fact that we are constantly bombarded

(unknowingly)with radio waves at & around that particular frequency

but without recieving what would be the next stage in the treatment.

Even at what are supposedly low power level emissions there must be

some effect especially on people with weakened immune systems. If

every time you open your garage door you receive a small dose of this

frequency surely it must have an accumulative effect!It seems to me

that instances of cancer have skyrocketed along with the use of

electronic equipment in the home/work environment in everyday life &

looking at things in the simplistic way that i do it's not difficult

to believe there may be a connection.

Ady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi ady...pretty amazing information...

what would be the " next stage in treatment " ?

ariella

--- " ady.stone " wrote:

> Mike Hi,

> After a bit more searching i came across

> this

> link/site/product-

> http://www.quasarelectronics.co.uk/30a17.htm

> Dr Holts favorite frequency to activate &

> " sensitize " cancer cells

> prior to Glucose blocking & more successful X-ray

> treatment is 434mhz,

> what i'm worried about is the fact that we are

> constantly bombarded

> (unknowingly)with radio waves at & around that

> particular frequency

> but without recieving what would be the next stage

> in the treatment.

> Even at what are supposedly low power level

> emissions there must be

> some effect especially on people with weakened

> immune systems. If

> every time you open your garage door you receive a

> small dose of this

> frequency surely it must have an accumulative

> effect!It seems to me

> that instances of cancer have skyrocketed along with

> the use of

> electronic equipment in the home/work environment in

> everyday life &

> looking at things in the simplistic way that i do

> it's not difficult

> to believe there may be a connection.

> Ady

>

>

" you are what you think about "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Again,

Just out of interest how many of you have a radio controlled

garage door or security camera & what frequency do they use?I just

checked a neighbors garage door transmitter(hand remote) & guess what?

it operates at 433.92mhz & has a range of 30 meters! I really don't

think that frequencies hovering around the " golden " 434mhz area should

be in everyday public use but should in fact be designated solely for

medical use for which Dr Holt should be given the credit he deserves

for discovering its benefits in conjunction with IMMEDIATE " after "

treatments. I would think that if this information were made public

knowledge there would be an uproar similar to the related one in

Australia. Just how many everyday gadjets etc operate at these

frequencies?

Ady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ady,

I do not think you have to worry about 434MHz in your cable TV

network, the signal strength is very small and electrically shielded

anyway. I do not see garage door transmitters as a problem, either. Use of

434MHz goes back to 1952 and was not invented by Holt for medical purposes,

either.

In Holt's paper " The Enigma of Cancer " , he says the following:

" As a youth having spent much time repairing radios I knew

instantaneously that cancer would tune the antenna whereas the normal

body would not do so at this frequency. 434MHz is the frequency that

was set aside immediately after the war by a decision between the

Germans and the French for medical purposes. Throughout the European

union today which includes southern Ireland but not Scandinavia and

the UK there are no regulations requiring screening of equipment

generating ultra high frequency radiowaves at this frequency.

Standard Frequency for European Medical Purposes

I made some inquiries and soon learnt that Siemens, Philips, Erbe,

Huettinger and at least 20 other manufacturing firms throughout

Europe were producing this equipment for physiotherapeutic purposes.

Approximately 200,000 small generators had been sold for this purpose

since 1952. Several million people must have been irradiated and when

I questioned Herr Guettner, the designer of the equipment in which I

was interested he said " there are no reports that I can discover of

any side effects from this frequency treatment. In Australia and the

USA it is a frequency set aside for amateur television, radio

communications between taxicabs etc and therefore here we must use it

in a screened room, called a Faraday cage. "

(The Enigma of Cancer II: Radiosensitising Agents, Page 9, Wellness

News, March 2002 Vol. 17 No. 2,

http://www.rife.de/holts_documentation.html)

The units Holt used consisted of 12 200W radio transmitters used at

close range, extremely powerful when compared to a TV cable system.

By the way, I have recently found some interesting information about

the Tronado machine in two German magazine articles:

DER SPIEGEL 40/1975 from 29.09.1975, Page 82

http://wissen.spiegel.de/wissen/dokument/dokument.html?

id=41406320 & top=SPIEGEL

This article discusses how the inventor of the Tronado machine was

trying to buy two luxus liners from the Italian government for 65

million Marks in order to turn them into swimming cancer clinics,

using the Tronado machine as part of the therapy. The patients were

to pay 9000 German Marks (DM) for a 3 week cruise with cancer

therapy. 1500 patients were to be treated on each trip. They also

discussed how the inventor was being laughed at due to the results of

an Australian study with his equipment. He sold his Tronado machines

for $330 000 even through the production costs were about $30 000. In

Germany, he had managed to sell one unit for 1.2 million DM. The unit

had also been tested in furt University under Prof. Karl Pirlet

who was not impressed.

A bank was prepared to loan him the money for the ships as long as

the bank could remain anonymous. The Italian government refused to

sell him the ships as they did not want to be associated with his

therapy.

In a follow up article 5 weeks later, Spiegel reported that the deal

with the ships had finally been cancelled.

I have attached the original articles as PDFs to the Holt thread

on the Rife Forum:

http://www.rifeforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=877

Regards

Moderator

>

> Hi,

> Just out of curiosity i started searching through all the

> TV,Radio,Marine etc etc frequency listings the other evening to see

if

> any of them were close to the frequency used by Dr Holt,434Mhz, to

> " sensitize " Cancer cells prior to treatment. I came across this

link

> http://www.tvtower.com/Commercial%20Television%20Frequencies.html

in

> which i found that Channel 59 (BBC)of the UK Cable TV network

operates

> at 433.25 Mhz - 437.75 Mhz the first being the sound " carrier " & the

> second the video " carrier " .I believe that since around 1974 Dr Holt

> has successfully used 434Mhz to " wake up " cancer cells to a hostile

> environment of Glucose starvation & bombardment with low dosage X-

rays

> which the Cancer cells are particularly unhappy about & promptly

die!

> What immediately sprang to mind was this- If we are surrounded by

> Radio waves " hovering " around this frequency every time we sit down

in

> front of the TV, are we unknowingly partaking in " Radio wave

therapy "

> without receiving the beneficial secondary parts of the treatment?

> Is it any wonder Dr Holt has struggled as he has to bring this

CURE

> to the forefront of Cancer treatment as he has? Billion dollar drug

> companies & TV aswell!

> Anyway,should we be worried? I am.

> Ady

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...