Viral Devitilization Principles

[Guest guest]

We have discussed in previous research the fact that dismantling just one of

the components of a viruses mechanics will devitalized the entire mechanism.

One of the components of a virus is the envelope. The envelope is a protective

coating that surrounds the virus in an attempt to fool the immune system into

thinking it is a friend and not an enemy. As a virus exits a healthy cell after

it has been replicated it will coat itself with the same chemical (protein film)

and molecular components of the healthy cell as a cloak to attempt to evade the

immune system. This is one reason why HIV is so dangerous. TruerRife Research

Page (We have reported an earlier study the ability to reduce the Viral load of

HIV by 122,000 or 40% in just 3 weeks)

When Rife systems are used, disrupting this molecular structure of the

envelope or this protective coating through resonance will result in a full

assault by the bodies immune system against these dangerous invaders since the

bodies defenses can now recognized them as foreign. This dismantling of the

coating may not be observable under most microscopes and it may even appear that

the virus is unaffected when in reality it has been altered on the molecular

level.

A Helix Vortex Allred Bulb

The following research articles as regards digestive enzymes / ozone and viral

attacks seems to confirm the above conclusions. Note the final statement

highlighted in the fifth paragraph.

Viruses and Digestive Enzymes

Viruses are not technically living things. They are particles made of proteins

and DNA or RNA. When talking about viruses, you will see virus treatments

referring to viral deactivation, virus inactivation, virus control, and virus

suppression as well as 'killing a virus'. All refer to trying to get rid of or

stop the harmful spread and effects of virus infection. A reference to virus

'die-off' means what happens while trying to get rid of a virus problem. But

this is not in the same literally meaning as bacteria or yeast die-off.

Digestive enzymes have excellent history in the treatment of viral diseases.

Viruses may enter the body by a variety of paths. An invading virus should be

subdued and immobilized by the immune system, lying dormant and harmless in the

body. In the gut, certain agents of the immune system in the mucosa lining

usually conquer any viruses. However, if the intestinal mucosa is damaged or is

deficient this can leave an opening for a virus to be reactivated, get out of

control and become industrious in the gut, even spreading to other parts of the

body. The same doorway results from having a weakened immune system.

What happens now? The viruses may cause direct symptoms and complications.

Possibly the virus leads to some gastrointestinal and/or neurological problems.

This may force the immune system to work at a higher level constantly. It

becomes overburdened on a daily basis, yet cannot completely destroy or subdue

the virus. Viruses may include the stealth virus, herpes virus, measles, chicken

pox, viral encephalitis among others. Some of these may cause autism-like

symptoms in children. Viruses are suspect as agents in many autoimmune diseases.

So what do you do about a virus once it becomes a problem? A basic therapy

against such viruses needs to focus on the immune system: improving its ability

to function, strengthening it, and enabling it to work at a more typical rate

and manner. Some people are seeing improvements with particular antiviral

medications. However, because of the nature of viruses, this may be more of a

cross-your-fingers-and-hope-for-the-best therapy. Researchers are working to

improve this as best they can.

Paragraph 5: Enzymes, particularly the proteases, turn out to be an excellent

therapy to use against a virus, working on several levels. Many viruses are

surrounded by a protective protein film, something a protease enzyme can digest

away. Eliminating this coating leaves the viruses unprotected and vulnerable to

antivirals and destruction.

How Do You Know if You Are Lacking Enzymes? Heartburn, gas, constipation,

bloating, allergies, ulcers, lack of energy and reduced functioning of the

immune system may occur when there are not enough enzymes.

Digestive enzymes occur naturally in raw or uncooked foods or can be

supplemented.

The mechanics of ozone

The following information is taken from:Ozone effects on bacteria, molds and

viruses - ozone and bacteria destruction

Ozone destroys viruses by diffusing through the protein coat into the nucleic

acid core, resulting in damage of the viral RNA. At higher concentrations,

ozone destroys the capsid, or exterior protein shell by oxidation so DNA

(deoxyribonucleic acid), or RNA (ribonucleic acid) structures of the

microorganism are affected.

Pathogen Dosage Aspergillus Niger (Black Mount) Destroyed by 1.5

to 2 mg/I Bacillus Bacteria Destroyed by 0.2 m/I within 30 seconds

Bacillus Anthracis (causes anthrax in sheep, cattle and pigs. Also a human

pathogen) Ozone susceptible Bacillus cereus 99% destruction after 5-min at

0.12 mg/l in water B. cereus (spores) 99% destruction after 5-min at 2.3

mg/l in water Bacillus subtilis 90% reduction at 0.10-PPM for 33 minutes

Bacteriophage f2 99.99% destruction at 0.41 mg/l for 10-seconds in water

Botrytis cinerea 3.8 mg/l for 2 minutes Candida Bacteria Ozone susceptible

Clavibacter michiganense 99.99% destruction at 1.1 mg/l for 5 minutes

Cladosporium 90% reduction at 0.10-PPM for 12.1 minutes Clostridium Bacteria

Ozone susceptible Clostridium Botulinum Spores. Its toxin paralyses the

central nerve system, being a poison multiplying in food and meals. 0.4 to 0.5

mg/l threshold value sackie Virus A9 95%

destruction at 0.035 mg/l for 10-seconds in water sackie Virus B5

99.99% destruction at 0.4 mg/l for 2.5-minutes in sludge effluent Diphtheria

Pathogen Destroyed by 1.5 to 2 mg/l Eberth Bacillus (Typhus abdomanalis).

Spreads typically by aqueous infection and causes typhoid. Destroyed by 1.5 to

2 mg/l Echo Virus 29: The virus most sensitive to ozone. After a contact

time of 1 minute at 1 mg/l of ozone, 99.999% killed. Enteric virus 95%

destruction at 4.1 mg/l for 29 minutes in raw wastewater Escherichia Coli

Bacteria (from feces) Destroyed by 0.2 mg/l within 30 seconds in air E-coli

(in clean water) 99.99% destruction at 0.25 mg/l for 1.6 minutes E-coli (in

wastewater) 99.9% destruction at 2.2 mg/l for 19 minutes

Encephalomyocarditis Virus Destroyed to zero level in less than 30 seconds with

0.1 to 0.8 mg/l. Endamoebic Cysts Bacteria Ozone susceptible Enterovirus

Virus Destroyed to zero level in less than 30 seconds with

0.1 to 0.8 mg/l. Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici 1.1 mg/l for 10

minutes Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. melonogea 99.99 % destruction at 1.1 mg/l

for 20 minutes GDVII Virus Destroyed to zero level in less than 30 seconds

with 0.1 to 0.8 mg/l. Hepatitis A virus 99.5% reduction at 0.25 mg/l for

2-seconds in a phosphate buffer Herpes Virus Destroyed to zero level in less

than 30 seconds wit 0.1 to 0.8 mg/l. Influenza Virus 0.4 to 0.5 mg/l

threshold value Klebs-Loffler Bacillus Destroyed by 1.5 to 2 mg/l

Legionella pneumophila 99.99% destruction at 0.32 mg/l for 20 minutes in

distilled water Luminescent Basidiomycetes (species having no melanin

pigment). Destroyed in 10 minutes at 100-PPM Mucor piriformis 3.8 mg/l for

2 minutes Mycobacterium avium 99.9% with a CT value of 0.17 in water

(scientifically reviewed document) Mycobacterium foruitum 90% destruction at

0.25 mg/l for 1.6 minutes in water Penicillium Bacteria Ozone susceptible

Phytophthora parasitica 3.8 mg/l for 2 minutes Poliomyelitis Virus 99.99%

kill with 0.3 to 0.4 mg/l in 3-4 minutes Poliovirus type 1 99.5% destruction

at 0.25 mg/l for 1.6 minutes in water Proteus Bacteria Very susceptible

Pseudomonas Bacteria Very susceptible Rhabdovirus virus Destroyed to zero

level in less than 30 seconds with 0.1 to 0.8 mg/l Salmonella Bacteria Very

susceptible Salmonella typhimurium 99.99% destruction at 0.25 mg/l for 1.67

minutes in water Schistosoma Bacteria Very susceptible Staph epidermidis

90% reduction at 0.1-ppm for 1.7 min Staphylococci Destroyed by 1.5 to 2.0

mg/l Stomatitis Virus Destroyed to zero level in less than 30 seconds with

0.1 to 0.8 mg/l Streptococcus Bacteria Destroyed by 0.2 mg/l within 30

seconds Verticillium dahliae

99.99 % destruction at 1.1 mg/l for 20 minutes Vesicular Virus Destroyed to

zero level in less than 30 seconds with 0.1 to 0.8 mg/l Virbrio Cholera

Bacteria Very susceptible Vicia Faba progeny Ozone causes chromosome

aberration and its effect is twice that observed by the action of X-rays

Along with Rife, one may want to add digestive enzymes, ozone and ionized

silver as part of their regiment against viral attacks!

---------------------------------

See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

Ken Uzzell wrote: > This is the best I can provide

at this time beyond the previous response

> to your post: http://truerife.com/research.html However this information

> would apply to not just audio but higher range frequencies as well. We

> use both.

> Mike

Hi Mike,

Any you do this very well.

Furthering on from my previous message, now that it is clear that pathogen

can have many MOR's - the answers we should be perusing, is what are the

" best " MOR's to use to destroy a pathogen invader while avoiding toxic load

" herx's " to the human body. If we target the pathogens outer cell structure

as Rife was doing, causing it to go kaboom, (look spectacular through a

microscope) then we release its guts into the body and blood stream, and

people can have terrible herx's, not to mention releasing other harmful

pathogen into the body that may live inside the target pathogen. Again, the

usefulness of the CAFL (I salute McInturf for the CAFL) and your

ongoing research and contributions for new frequencies for humanity to use.

But where are we going? It's time to get smart about our bug killing. Here I

take my hat off to Cher, she is brilliant and a

genious, for she is targeting the pathogens DNA - what a great MOR, thus

killing the pathogen and preserving its outer structure, thus avoiding the

kaboom factor which will minimise the Herx severity for people.

I don't know if pathogen DNA is similar to our own, but Dr Bruce Lipton

Ph.D., cellular biologist, researched removing the nucleus from human cells,

and the cells would still go on living for upto 30 days before their

proteins died, and then the cell died. A slower way to kill cells, but at

the end of the day, very deadly with minimum collateral damage to us humans

with regard to herx's. May be pathogens DNA and proteins interact quicker

than human cells, thus using the pathogens DNA effects quicker death than a

human cell? A brilliant MOR for Cher to use.

Other effective ways to destroy a pathogen using resonance MOR's is to

disrupt it's proteins, this will really slow it down, but it's DNA would

produce more proteins, but in have ongoing sessions over a few days would

cause the destruction of the pathogen while keeping its cell wall structure

intact as it could not keep up replacing the frequency damaged proteins.

Other MOR's would be to interrupt its breeding cycles, or damage the

receptors and effectors on its cell wall. These are tiny protein antenna and

would be very susceptible to our frequencies, and thus destroy the pathogens

ability to live without destroying its cell wall.

From results people are experiencing, it is quite clear we are working at

many levels of pathogen destruction with many different MOR's for the

various components that make up the pathogen cell.

Regards

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

---------------------------------

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

[Guest guest]

>When Rife systems are used, disrupting this molecular structure of

>the envelope or this protective coating through resonance will

>result in a full assault by the bodies immune system against these

>dangerous invaders since the bodies defenses can now recognized them

>as foreign.

Mike, are you intending to suggest that your product does this? There

is no evidence " Rife systems " , let alone audio ones, are capable of

disrupting the protective coating of viruses.

>The following research articles as regards digestive enzymes / ozone

>and viral attacks seems to confirm the above conclusions.

No actually it doesn't. IMO this is yet another attempt to associate

accepted fact with Rife therapy as a dubious means of validation.

>Along with Rife, one may want to add digestive enzymes, ozone and

>ionized silver as part of their regiment against viral attacks!

What a coincidence. I was just thinking about selling all these.

Nielsen