Re: Electrons In The E Field

[Guest guest]

,

Thanks for the link! The health benefits of placing a ground wire on

one's bed was discovered back in the 1930's by Starr White MD.

Only problem..... remembering to disconnect the wire in a lightning storm!

Jim

>Here's another:

>

><http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/acm.2007.7048>http://www.lieb\

ertonline.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/acm.2007.7048

[Guest guest]

Ken wrote

[snip]

> This is comforting to know that folks with the Rife contact systems are

also

> receiving benefits here, to the effect of knocking out free radicals in

> their body. This would indicate regular use at low power levels could keep

> us youthful and avoid degeneration caused by age and free radicals hurting

> our cells. This is a pretty potent benefit, especially when we include the

> potential Rife application of knocking out microbes and Char's

contribution

> of upsetting microbe DNA. Even if you miss with the frequency, there are

> many other benefits to be had. [snip]

Ken, I completely agree. A personal testimonial here - about a year and a

half ago I had a prolonged anaphalactic reaction to a sting from a

bald-faced hornet. Prolonged as in 2 weeks long! There were no immediate

breathing problems, but 16 hours after the sting my body set up a systemic

inflammatory response, with debilitating diarrhea. I did not know at the

time it what was going on. (And it was by far THE most painful sting I've

ever received...we keep bees here and there is no comparison!)

Long story short - I nursed myself back, but on the 13th day was still

experiencing painful intestinal cramping. Getting tired of that routine, I

decided to try a general set of freqs using a plasma device. After the

session finished, the pain was gone and never returned. Somehow, the

session knocked my system back into normal mode of operation.

The alternating, changing e-fields being emitted from plasma may be

affecting not only electrons, but also the portion of electrolytes which are

free (unbound). And the fields may also affect free water molecules, which

are polar. And to some extent this may also be happening with contact

devices, because electrons emit their own e-field on a micro-level.

So yes, the benefits from the devices undoubtedly come from several

directions, frequency-specific and non-frequency-specific.

Char

www.dnafrequencies.com

[Guest guest]

I have thought about the flow of electrons through contact devices

into the subject. What about the possibility that there is

electrolysis of minerals from bone that act as pH buffers raising

the subject's pH. Any research out there to verify or dispute this?

Tom

>

> Ken wrote

>

> [snip]

> > This is comforting to know that folks with the Rife contact

systems are

> also

> > receiving benefits here, to the effect of knocking out free

radicals in

> > their body. This would indicate regular use at low power levels

could keep

> > us youthful and avoid degeneration caused by age and free

radicals hurting

> > our cells. This is a pretty potent benefit, especially when we

include the

> > potential Rife application of knocking out microbes and Char's

> contribution

> > of upsetting microbe DNA. Even if you miss with the frequency,

there are

> > many other benefits to be had. [snip]

>

> Ken, I completely agree. A personal testimonial here - about a

year and a

> half ago I had a prolonged anaphalactic reaction to a sting from a

> bald-faced hornet. Prolonged as in 2 weeks long! There were no

immediate

> breathing problems, but 16 hours after the sting my body set up a

systemic

> inflammatory response, with debilitating diarrhea. I did not know

at the

> time it what was going on. (And it was by far THE most painful

sting I've

> ever received...we keep bees here and there is no comparison!)

>

> Long story short - I nursed myself back, but on the 13th day was

still

> experiencing painful intestinal cramping. Getting tired of that

routine, I

> decided to try a general set of freqs using a plasma device.

After the

> session finished, the pain was gone and never returned. Somehow,

the

> session knocked my system back into normal mode of operation.

>

> The alternating, changing e-fields being emitted from plasma may be

> affecting not only electrons, but also the portion of electrolytes

which are

> free (unbound). And the fields may also affect free water

molecules, which

> are polar. And to some extent this may also be happening with

contact

> devices, because electrons emit their own e-field on a micro-level.

>

> So yes, the benefits from the devices undoubtedly come from several

> directions, frequency-specific and non-frequency-specific.

>

> Char

> www.dnafrequencies.com

>

[Guest guest]

--- Bare wrote:

> ,

>

> Thanks for the link! The health benefits of placing

> a ground wire on

> one's bed was discovered back in the 1930's by

> Starr White MD.

> Only problem..... remembering to disconnect the wire

> in a lightning storm!

I haven't had a problem so far. The wrist strap I'm

currently using still has the 1 MOhm resistor in it

for safety, and as I said, other systems have a fuse.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

I would appreciate suggestions from those using a grounding approach as to how

one deals with the wires getting tangled, or torn loose, if one moves around

while sleeping. Or if huband and wife are both connected, how to minimize the

wires from disturbing one's sleep.

Thank you.

Ringas wrote:

--- Bare wrote:

> ,

>

> Thanks for the link! The health benefits of placing

> a ground wire on

> one's bed was discovered back in the 1930's by

> Starr White MD.

> Only problem..... remembering to disconnect the wire

> in a lightning storm!

I haven't had a problem so far. The wrist strap I'm

currently using still has the 1 MOhm resistor in it

for safety, and as I said, other systems have a fuse.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

Thanks all for the grounding information. For a novice, where would one

purchase such wrist straps with a resistor or fuse? Also, in terms of a couple,

I did a google search on carbonized mats, and was not successful, particularly

since of the articles mentions the technical specifications required for such

mats. Any information would be very much appreciated.

Ringas wrote:

--- Bare wrote:

> ,

>

> Thanks for the link! The health benefits of placing

> a ground wire on

> one's bed was discovered back in the 1930's by

> Starr White MD.

> Only problem..... remembering to disconnect the wire

> in a lightning storm!

I haven't had a problem so far. The wrist strap I'm

currently using still has the 1 MOhm resistor in it

for safety, and as I said, other systems have a fuse.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

Hi Medmidas,

2008 should be a great year, thanks for the great wishes.

Now this is where the theory gets real interesting.

We have two electrodes on the body, and the electron flow is from the (+)

signal electrode to the (-) ground electrode.

The body has a high resistance, usually. So for the sake of discussion, if

10 trillion electrons flowed out the positive electrode every second, there

would not be 10 trillion electrons per second at the (-) ground electrode,

they would disappear in the resistance load. In electronics, we say these

electrons generate and dissipate in heat caused by the resistance, but this

must also mean that there are many millions of electrons available to

neutralise many millions of free radicals. This could mean that the body

resistance and power presented to the body could be equated to available

electrons to neutralise free radicals?

From my understanding of what medical authorities tell us, it is the aging

process (slowing down of biological systems) and the increase of free

radicals that lead to the demise of the body, not to mention pathogen loads

and the bodies ability to balance its bugs and toxin elimination.

One friend of mine in her high 60'ies has been using a basic Rife type

electrode system for some months, a few 30 minute sessions per week. She is

really looking much younger, skin, eyes, clear mind, more youthful gate, and

her energy has greatly improved. Her diet has not been wonderful, and she is

a smoker, so I would assume high levels of free radicals exist in her body.

Her herpes virus hasn't broken out since starting with Rife. So many

wonderful things happen to the body when we use Rife technology, and you

have to admit, what other type of therapy has so many upsides with little or

no downsides?

No other therapy can come anywhere close to what Rife frequency therapy

provides.

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Re: Electrons In The E Field

> Hi,

> Wishing you all a very Happy & Healthy 2008.

>

> In contact electrodes, the electrons going in thru' one electrode

> comes out onto/thru' the other electrode to complete the circuit.

>

> Plasma causes static excitation or resonance at cellular level.

>

> May be I am wrong, just my thought.

>

> Healthy Regards,

> gesi

>

>

> Ken Uzzell wrote:

>> Greetings,

>>

>> I've been reading about the benefits of free electrons from power sources

>> which act as antioxidents in the body, may be in a massive way.

>>

>> It is obvious there is a strong electron flow in contact electrodes, but

>> would there be free electrons in a plasma transmission?

>>

>> Sincerely,

>> Ken Uzzell

>> http://heal-me.com.au

>> * FreX - CHIamp

>> In Search of Spontantious Remissions With Rife Machines :-)

>>

>>

>>

[Guest guest]

Hi Gordon,

I can hear the sound waves with those single electrode plasma balls (more to

do with vibration on the glass), and if I touch the glass ball and hold a

neon light in my other hand, then the neon light, lights-up. Isn't this a

flow of electrons across my body, and into the neon lamp that causes it to

light up?

With my RF dual electrode plasma system, like a mini B/R, there is no sound

that I can hear, but a strong " feeling " of the signal on and in the body.

When I sit at a distance from a plasma tube (both types of machines), and

place oscilloscope probes on my body, I can clearly see the signal, I.E. a

RF carrier switched on and off with audio frequency timings. Don't

oscilloscopes measure the signal by electron flow? If so, then it should be

important to know hows those electrons got onto our body or is the plasma

tube making the body create the signal we see from our own body energy, with

our oscilloscopes?

Sincerely,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Re: Electrons In The E Field

>

> > Hullo Ken,

> >

> > No electrons leave the gas filled glass envelope.

> >

> > gordon

> >

> > Greetings,

> >

> > I've been reading about the benefits of free electrons from power

> sources

> > which act as antioxidents in the body, may be in a massive way.

> >

> > It is obvious there is a strong electron flow in contact electrodes,

> but

> > would there be free electrons in a plasma transmission?

> >

> > Sincerely,

> > Ken Uzzell

> > http://heal-me.com.au

> > * FreX - CHIamp

> > In Search of Spontaneous Remissions With Rife Machines :-)

[Guest guest]

> Shirley Armintrout wrote:

>

> Thanks all for the grounding information. For a

> novice, where would one purchase such wrist straps

> with a resistor or fuse?

You should be able to find a grounding wrist strap at

any electronics store. The one I'm currently using is

from the following company:

http://www.desco.com/DescoCatalog/PersonnelGrounding/WristStrapsCoilCords/Single\

WireWristStraps/

I have one with a 12 foot coil cord. The usual 6 foot

cord seems a little too short.

> Also, in terms of a

> couple, how would one deal with the possibility of

> the wires becoming entangled?

There's no real difference for couples, as long as

they each stay on their side of the bed. Each would

have to wear their strap on the wrist that's on their

edge of the bed. If they are engaging in " entangling "

activity, it might be best to disconnect the cords for

the duration. ;^)

> I did a google search

> on carbonized mats, and was not successful,

> particularly since of the articles mentions the

> technical specifications required for such mats.

> Any information would be very much appreciated.

The best way to do the body grounding is to make a

fitted sheet with conductive fabric, and connect the

ground wire to the fabric. You can find the proper

fabric here:

http://lessemf.com/fabric.html

The fabric that has been used in the commercial mats

is the same as the EX-STATIC at the given link. The

latest commercial mats are just laid across the bottom

portion of the mattress so that the feet and legs

touch them. One thing I'm going to try in the future

is to put a full size piece of aluminum or brass sheet

metal under the mattress and have the ground wire

connected to that, and then have the conductive fabric

wrap around and touch the sheet metal.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

Hi Ken,

Honestly I am dim.

And I am very confident, I am not convincing all of the time.

Electrons & current have same same magnitude but opposite directions or

polarity.

Centuries ago, some wise guys said current flows from (+) to (-).

Later when people got wiser they found out Current is flow of electrons,

& electrons being negatively charged, flows from (-) to (+).

It is like " Accuracy is actually inaccuracy "

The present day wiser people didn't have the courage to alter the terms

coined centuries ago.

For antioxidant property, chemistry/biochemistry is involved.

Electrons do not have this property directly.

Electrons are not hydrogen.

Hydrogen has more particles than just one electron to make it a stable

atom/molecule.

One mechanism which emits free electrons (Non returning)

is a radioactive source which emit beta rays.

Beta rays are pure electrons.

These free electrons also do not have antioxidant property.

These do cause radiation damage.

Bombarding Phosphorus with beta rays it gets converted to sulfur,

the difference between Phosphorus & Sulfur is one electron.

Pls forgive me, I am saying this from from my half knowledge (Not verified).

But this anyway is not the issue, & is off topic, & I may be wrong as usual.

===========================================

Ken Uzzell wrote:

> Hi Medmidas,

>

> This is interesting.

>

> What would " current " be if it is not electrons?

>

> So the ElectroRegenesis system which is meant to be FDA and TGA approved

> have got it wrong with the Antioxident effect ? You would think these

> government bodies who are very strict with electro therapy devices would

> want proof of Antioxident functions before allowing such claims to be made.

>

> Sincerely,

> Ken Uzzell

> http://heal-me.com.au

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

>>What would " current " be if it is not electrons?

>

> http://iss.cet.edu/electricity/pages/b14.xml

>

> Nielsen

This site you provided says current goes from positive to negative, and visa

versa for electrons. This is cool and I can accept this.

But my question still remains, what is current if it is not electrons ?

When I search google for " what is current " - all the sites just say it is a

flow of current measured in ampiers, this doesn't explain or say too much

about current.

Like is current a super charged form of magnetic energy?

A type of photon?

We know its not a wave as current exists in pure DC

There is that new theory on " strings " which are meant to be EM particles,

could current be a flow of strings?

Theories are okay, like you have been an Electronic Engineer for 35 years,

so you must have entertained the thought at some time, " what is a current

flow " ?

I haven't gotten around to readying your links from the previous post to me.

Hopefully over the weekend I will get some time.

Sincerely,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

[Guest guest]

Great.

An answer to the point.

Not less not more.

Nielsen wrote:

>> What would " current " be if it is not electrons?

>>

>

> http://iss.cet.edu/electricity/pages/b14.xml

>

> Nielsen

[Guest guest]

[Ken wrote]

> But my question still remains, what is current if it is not electrons ?

>

> When I search google for " what is current " - all the sites just say it is

a

> flow of current measured in ampiers, this doesn't explain or say too much

> about current.

Ken, one of the physics books I have here, has some good writing and

explanations. Here's a piece that might apply to this discussion. Stars

are my addition, for emphasis.

" Electrons at room temperature make progress down a wire very slowly,

typically at a mere 1 mm/s or so. How, then, can the telephone manage to

transmit electrical signals along its clutter of wires at close to the speed

of light? The answer is simple: the electron we push on in New York is not

the one that tickles the phone in San Francisco. The starting electron

might take 16 minutes to travel the first meter of the journey; it may not

even be out the door before the message is over! The situation is like a

long pipe filled with water. You push inward at this end, and a pulse of

water carrying energy spurts out the other end. A disturbance of the water

rapidly propagates down the pipe even though any given sample of liquid

hardly moves. **It's the electric field that can be thought of as traveling

down the wire at near the speed of light, carrying the signal, setting the

electrons in motion before it.** When we buy electrical energy, we don't

buy electrons, there are plenty of those in the wires we already have - we

buy additional amounts of electron motion. The power company pushes around

our electrons and sends us a bill for how much work they did in the

process. "

This is in line with what Bearden and some other scientists have been saying

about current/electron travel (or lack thereof).

Another place in the text explains some conventions about the lingo:

" Normally, a current in a metal wire is a stream of free electrons. But,

the mobile charge carriers constituting a current can be positive, negative,

or both. The latter may be the case, for example, in a semiconductor or a

plasma. Stars, streetlights, and fluorescent lamps contain plasmas wherein

streams of oppositely charged acrriers can be made to flow past each other

in opposite directions.

The mobile charge carriers in Fig. 19.1 happen to be positive - just the

sort of picture Ben lin had in mind for a current. Because of him, the

direction of flow of positive charge is traditionally taken to be the

direction of current, regardless of the actual sign of the participating

carriers. Since electrons are the carriers in ordinary wires, this custom

can be a little awkward at times, though it's easy enough to live with. A

flow of negative carriers to the left is equivalent to an equal flow of

positive carriers to the right.. "

Simply as an additional point of interest, the author says about the human

body:

" Minute currents in the microamp range are commonplace, even within the

human body. Microamp currents are generated in bone and connective tissue

during exercise and seem to play a vital role in sustaining the health of

these structures. "

These quotes were taken from the book " Physics: Calculus " , volume 2, by

Eugene Hecht, 1996; pages 733, 725, 724 (respectively).

Put in the simplest of terms, external motion created by some outside force,

will generate current. It can be exercise, or it can movement of an

electric field.

Also, at page 662, the author gives representative, comparative values of

electric field strengths, here is a sampling:

- background radiation in space is 0.000003 V/m (volts per meter)

- center of typical living room is about 3 V/m

- 30 cm. from a stereo is 90 V/m

- a low power laser beam is 100 V/m

- the atmosphere in fair weather is at about 150 V/m

- 30 cm from an electric blanket is 250 V/m

- atmosphere during a thunderstorm is 10,000 V/m

- breakdown of air is at 3 million V/m

- an x-ray tube is at 5 million V/m

- and interestingly, at a cell membrane is 10 million V/m (wow!)

- the field created by a pulsed laser system is 570 billion V/m

- the field at an electron in a hydrogen atom is 600 billion V/m

This is all very fascinating...

Char

www.dnafrequencies.com

[Guest guest]

In my previous post, I wrote:

" Put in the simplest of terms, external motion created by some outside

force,

will generate current. It can be exercise, or it can movement of an

electric field. "

But it would have been more accurate to say,

Put in the simplest of terms, external motion created by some outside force

on charged particle(s),

will generate current. It can be exercise, or it can movement of an

electric field. Or, motion generated from other sources.

Char

[Guest guest]

>But my question still remains, what is current if it is not electrons?

It is. Current is nothing other than the rate of motion of electrons

past a given point, 1 ampere being 6,250,000,000,000,000,000 per

second. In the real world, electrons are negative, so they " current "

toward positive zones of lesser concentration. This potential is

expressed as a voltage difference.

But this is also relative. For example, there can be two surfaces,

one negative with respect to another but both positive in relation to

a third. Hence, depending on your reference point, you can have a

flow from less positive to more positive. This does not imply

anything intrinsically positive is moving.

Obviously then, science was wrong about currents of electrons

travelling + to - and is not overly keen to fix it. Partly because we

intuitively associate a plus to be _more_ of something, not in terms

of electrical charge. So we are left with an ambiguous " convention "

for notation of current, where it runs opposed to electrons. This

follows through to circuit diagrams. There is no functional

significance or esoteric meaning. It's just flat Earth stuff.

Some brave textbooks do use the correct " electron flow " model, which

is fine so long as it is applied consistently. IOW both work, it's

all just a matter of word definition. if I call the sun the moon and

stick with it, it has no bearing on reality. Names are just labels.

Please respect this when I start marketing my " Quantum Anti-gravity "

party balloons.

BTW alternating current (AC) means just that. There is no net

transfer of electrons. They oscillate back and forth in the wire. The

usual anology is shaking one end of a rope and having the other end

move. Power companies to shake the rope. DC is more like toothpaste

coming out of a tube. I always thought it was better value.

There does exist a reciprocal force to electron flow, but that's

another story. It's not what is conventionally termed current.

Nielsen

[Guest guest]

Thanks Cher,

I'm pretty sure I am getting a grasp on what current is now.

Thanks for going to the trouble to explain this to me.

Somethings are easy for me to see, while other things that are pretty basic

in nature, can be difficult for me to understand.

Sincerely,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Re: Electrons In The E Field

> In my previous post, I wrote:

>

> " Put in the simplest of terms, external motion created by some outside

> force,

> will generate current. It can be exercise, or it can movement of an

> electric field. "

>

> But it would have been more accurate to say,

>

> Put in the simplest of terms, external motion created by some outside

> force

> on charged particle(s),

> will generate current. It can be exercise, or it can movement of an

> electric field. Or, motion generated from other sources.

>

> Char

[Guest guest]

Thanks ,

You have explained this so well. I couldn't find any other info on the web

that was as clear and concise as your description. You should be a teacher,

you are good at getting the message across, especially when there have been

two approaches to this topic which has probably led to my confusion.

Sincerely,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Re: Electrons In The E Field

>

>>But my question still remains, what is current if it is not electrons?

>

> It is. Current is nothing other than the rate of motion of electrons

> past a given point, 1 ampere being 6,250,000,000,000,000,000 per

> second. In the real world, electrons are negative, so they " current "

> toward positive zones of lesser concentration. This potential is

> expressed as a voltage difference.

>

> But this is also relative. For example, there can be two surfaces,

> one negative with respect to another but both positive in relation to

> a third. Hence, depending on your reference point, you can have a

> flow from less positive to more positive. This does not imply

> anything intrinsically positive is moving.

>

> Obviously then, science was wrong about currents of electrons

> travelling + to - and is not overly keen to fix it. Partly because we

> intuitively associate a plus to be _more_ of something, not in terms

> of electrical charge. So we are left with an ambiguous " convention "

> for notation of current, where it runs opposed to electrons. This

> follows through to circuit diagrams. There is no functional

> significance or esoteric meaning. It's just flat Earth stuff.

>

> Some brave textbooks do use the correct " electron flow " model, which

> is fine so long as it is applied consistently. IOW both work, it's

> all just a matter of word definition. if I call the sun the moon and

> stick with it, it has no bearing on reality. Names are just labels.

> Please respect this when I start marketing my " Quantum Anti-gravity "

> party balloons.

>

> BTW alternating current (AC) means just that. There is no net

> transfer of electrons. They oscillate back and forth in the wire. The

> usual anology is shaking one end of a rope and having the other end

> move. Power companies to shake the rope. DC is more like toothpaste

> coming out of a tube. I always thought it was better value.

>

> There does exist a reciprocal force to electron flow, but that's

> another story. It's not what is conventionally termed current.

>

> Nielsen

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi N.,

I hope to be starting on your reading list soon. But after reading your

message I did a google search on ...

cell receptors electromagnetic

.... and came upon a most interesting site that lists the frequencies of cell

receptor stimulation by EM fields.

http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7089060-claims.html

After my lite studies in psychology and genetic remodelling, I was

fascinated by literally thousand of antenna like structures covering all our

cells. One line of genetic research says these receptors and effectors on

the cell membrane are the real intelligence of the cells, and life, not the

cell nucleus. Microscopic images of these receptors look like a huge TV

station with all these antennas, just waiting for EM signals to help spur

them into action if their performance is a little slow.

The above site may confirm this and list the frequencies to do so. All in

our audio range.

Sincerely,

Ken Uzzell

http://heal-me.com.au

Re: Electrons In The E Field

>

>>Isn't this a

>>flow of electrons across my body, and into the neon lamp that causes it to

>>light up?

>>

>>(snip) is the plasma

>>tube making the body create the signal we see from our own body energy,

>>with

>>our oscilloscopes?

>

>

> These are two distinct cases. In the first, electrons are transferred

> by direct contact. It's like the static charge you get from walking

> on a carpet, only pulsed. In the second, the body is acting like an

> antenna. Electrons are not transferred, but rather

> electromagnetically induced at a distance. See " Faraday's law " . The

> latter implies biological receptors, of which a few are known.

>

> Consequently, a different avenue of stimulation is afforded by each

> modality, eg. contact electrodes and plasma tubes (or coils).

> Irrespective of this, both impart therapeutic effects by mobilizing

> electrons, primarily through evoked electromotive or biochemical

> response. Locality is determined by resonant structures and applied

> frequency. Therefore, commonality exists. However, this is confounded

> by the relative efficiency of each modality, not to mention that of

> the equipment involved, at any given frequency.

>

> The internal mechanisms are complex and not well understood. They are

> the " missing link " between a device and its reliably observed

> effects. IOW a form of proof and framework for future advances. One

> of the best places to look for clues is in the extensive body of

> literature on environmental EMR and health. After all, any

> demonstration of a negative impact has the potential for being

> reverse engineered into a positive one. Here is one such useful website.

>

> http://www.feb.se/index_int.htm

>

> And a sample article from there:

>

> http://www.feb.se/emfguru/EMF/genotoxic/Genotoxic-EMR-paper.htm

>

> Interesting electron therapy patent. DC, of course, is more

> straightforward than FRT.

>

> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4010742.html

>

> And this:

>

> http://www.hbci.com/~wenonah/bob/index.html

>

> Then there are plain vanilla electrons ... and electrons as

> information carriers.

>

> http://www.baar.com/wetcell.htm

>

> Or, if you have any time left, Google " Berry's phase " .

>

> Nielsen

[Guest guest]

Ken Uzzell wrote:

Don't worry about it Ken. It's a syndrome common to many (including

myself) ....Its often refered to as " Not being the sharpest chisel in

the tool shed " ... sorry there are no frequencies for this malady on

the CAFL list...lol.

Be Well, Be Happy.

Graham Dilks . Folsom CA . Usa

> Thanks Cher,

>

> I'm pretty sure I am getting a grasp on what current is now.

>

> Thanks for going to the trouble to explain this to me.

>

> Somethings are easy for me to see, while other things that are pretty

> basic

> in nature, can be difficult for me to understand.

>

> Sincerely,

> Ken Uzzell

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Shirley,

The EMF Safety Superstore at www.lessemf.com offers antistatic mats at 12x21

inches (pillow size) for $15 US. Or else mattress size 36 inch on the roll at $2

per linear foot.

Such a pad could avoid spousal strangulation from wrist wires.

Happy Earthing.

Geoff

Shirley Armintrout wrote:

Thanks all for the grounding information. For a novice, where would

one purchase such wrist straps with a resistor or fuse? Also, in terms of a

couple, I did a google search on carbonized mats, and was not successful,

particularly since of the articles mentions the technical specifications

required for such mats. Any information would be very much appreciated.

Ringas wrote:

--- Bare wrote:

> ,

>

> Thanks for the link! The health benefits of placing

> a ground wire on

> one's bed was discovered back in the 1930's by

> Starr White MD.

> Only problem..... remembering to disconnect the wire

> in a lightning storm!

I haven't had a problem so far. The wrist strap I'm

currently using still has the 1 MOhm resistor in it

for safety, and as I said, other systems have a fuse.

Regards,