Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Hi , I don't know if there are any studies on how or when our bodies eliminate metals. This could be in part because there isn't an agreed apon metals test to my knowledge. Some experts say to use the hair test, some say that's bogus. And I don't think a blood test will find evidence of a metal that is stored in a nerve or fat deposit. Until the experts can agree on a test, how can research be done? My comments on healthy bodies processing metals naturally in their own time come purely from my understanding of the nature of our bodies. We are all exposed to metals. Most of us process those and go on our merry way completely unaware. Our kids' bodies don't run this efficiently. Their bodies don't know how to process metals, or are too tired fighting other things to process it, so their bodies stash it. My son reacted like this to even Herpes, not trying to fight it, not even recognizing the foreign attacker in his brain. Now his body is healthy. He is fighting the Herpes. If he has metal in his system that was not processed but stored, why wouldn't his healthier body come across it and recognize it as foreign and process it as a healthy body would? Dr. Goldberg told me that my son's body would get strong and fight. I have been watching this transformation take place and have no reason to doubt his word. I can understand how this may not satisfy the need for proof for some of you, but the science behind -- the tests and treatment is very scientific and full of proof. I wouldn't mind hard scientific proof either, but to see the changes in my own house is enough for me. , best of luck to you in your search for solid answers. Sincerely, April Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Hi Sharon, Thanks, we are back to a variation of " which came first, the chicken or the egg " . Just read Dr. McCandless' book where she says she gets the body more healthy through supplementation/chelation and THEN addresses viral/immunity issues. Just a question of how a particular clinician feels is the quickest way to health for a child. I do really, really, wish some dr who is doing viral/immune things could just do some testing to see if anything does get excreted. Have I said that before? Re: April/was: and Chelation , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 There is evidence to suggest that genetic polymorphisms on genes responsible for detoxification of heavy metals and other xenobiotics are more prevalent in autistic kids than controls. See the work of Jill . So those at risk have a diminished capacity to rid heavy metals from the body. Could be that the general population has been exposed to increasingly higher levels of environmental toxin and that we already carry a burden in utero (there is a consensus in the CDC about this too). For the most part our bodies can eliminate heavy metals, but in others detox is slower and if say they were born from the late eighties to the early 2000, then those kids got an extra special bolus dose of mercury in the form of thimerisol, and for some with altered detox capacities, it was not a good thing. There are a number of biomedical things one can do to assist the detox pathways. R Re: April/was: and Chelation , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 There are a number of physicians treating kids that do test for metal excretion and find that upon challenge with a chelating agent, more mercury and lead comes out of autistic kids vrs non autistic. Liz Mumpher in Virginia, and Jeff Bradstreet in Florida to name a couple. Two highly committed physicians. Anyway Don't want to spark a controversy on this site. I'll be glad to talk off line. Ray Re: April/was: and Chelation Hi Sharon, Thanks, we are back to a variation of " which came first, the chicken or the egg " . Just read Dr. McCandless' book where she says she gets the body more healthy through supplementation/chelation and THEN addresses viral/immunity issues. Just a question of how a particular clinician feels is the quickest way to health for a child. I do really, really, wish some dr who is doing viral/immune things could just do some testing to see if anything does get excreted. Have I said that before? Re: April/was: and Chelation , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 My son is missing the genes for glutathione production. They are completely absent. Glutathione is part of the metal excretion pathway. - " Palmer, F " <palmerr@...> wrote: There is evidence to suggest that genetic polymorphisms on genes responsible for detoxification of heavy metals and other xenobiotics are more prevalent in autistic kids than controls. See the work of Jill . So those at risk have a diminished capacity to rid heavy metals from the body. Could be that the general population has been exposed to increasingly higher levels of environmental toxin and that we already carry a burden in utero (there is a consensus in the CDC about this too). For the most part our bodies can eliminate heavy metals, but in others detox is slower and if say they were born from the late eighties to the early 2000, then those kids got an extra special bolus dose of mercury in the form of thimerisol, and for some with altered detox capacities, it was not a good thing. There are a number of biomedical things one can do to assist the detox pathways. R Re: April/was: and Chelation , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 , what do you do then? What is the treatment for this if he has no glutathione production? Re: April/was: and Chelation , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Here's an interesting concept. Dr. Klinghardt MD, PhD has done emotional work (as a piece of the puzzle) with very ill people that he has found to have heavy metal accumulation. He has done before and after urine tests on patients that undergo a very cathartic type of psychotherapy that is used in Europe, but pretty uncommon here in the USA (he is German, but practices in the USA). After the 2-day therapy, the patients dumped mercury and other heavy metals in their urine. They were not using any type of chelation. He explains (in ways that I cannot) how metal and viruses are bound together, but a person's emotional state cannot be ignored either. I don't think he has done this before/after test with viral treatment per say, because he is big on " what ever you do, do not stop your child's mercury detox until they are cured (for ASD kids). " - Cochran <Ladyshrink111@...> wrote: Hi Sharon, Thanks, we are back to a variation of " which came first, the chicken or the egg " . Just read Dr. McCandless' book where she says she gets the body more healthy through supplementation/chelation and THEN addresses viral/immunity issues. Just a question of how a particular clinician feels is the quickest way to health for a child. I do really, really, wish some dr who is doing viral/immune things could just do some testing to see if anything does get excreted. Have I said that before? Re: April/was: and Chelation , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Question about your first paragraph... Forget metals -- is there actually a reliable test for virals? My understanding is that since viruses are constantly mutating, titres are not really that accurate. I'm sure you all have seen the on-line video of Ethan's autism recovery on Valtrex. Ethan's blood work did not come up with any viral markers, but they decided to just " give Valtrex a try. " After a horrible rash and a few days of nasty detox symptoms, Ethan began to develop normally. His most impressive transformation occurred after 21 days on Valtrex. He used a special diet, anti-fungals and Valtrex for 9 months and has needed no further meds. - April Jagnow <april@...> wrote: Hi , I don't know if there are any studies on how or when our bodies eliminate metals. This could be in part because there isn't an agreed apon metals test to my knowledge. Some experts say to use the hair test, some say that's bogus. And I don't think a blood test will find evidence of a metal that is stored in a nerve or fat deposit. Until the experts can agree on a test, how can research be done? My comments on healthy bodies processing metals naturally in their own time come purely from my understanding of the nature of our bodies. We are all exposed to metals. Most of us process those and go on our merry way completely unaware. Our kids' bodies don't run this efficiently. Their bodies don't know how to process metals, or are too tired fighting other things to process it, so their bodies stash it. My son reacted like this to even Herpes, not trying to fight it, not even recognizing the foreign attacker in his brain. Now his body is healthy. He is fighting the Herpes. If he has metal in his system that was not processed but stored, why wouldn't his healthier body come across it and recognize it as foreign and process it as a healthy body would? Dr. Goldberg told me that my son's body would get strong and fight. I have been watching this transformation take place and have no reason to doubt his word. I can understand how this may not satisfy the need for proof for some of you, but the science behind -- the tests and treatment is very scientific and full of proof. I wouldn't mind hard scientific proof either, but to see the changes in my own house is enough for me. , best of luck to you in your search for solid answers. Sincerely, April Responsibility for the content of this message lies strictly with the original author(s), and is not necessarily endorsed by or the opinion of the Research Institute and/or the Parent Coalition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 I have that same question!!! We were instantly prescribed trans-dermal glutathione (it just arrived this week), but I don't know if that is all we need to do/all we can do. - Cochran <Ladyshrink111@...> wrote: , what do you do then? What is the treatment for this if he has no glutathione production? Re: April/was: and Chelation , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Regarding accurate testing for viral titers - titers can be helpful but not entirely accurate. Whether this is new knowledge or widely understood in immunology, I think it is forgotten or overlooked. Other labs used in conjunction together can be used to indicate chronic viruses... some of those (not limited to and not necessarily a viral marker and could be related to other disorders) - immune panel - can show a shift to type of immune cells that are activated, low natural killer cells (under 8%?), mildly elevated liver panel, CBC, low iron on Ferriten (and other markers in that panel) and B12 (or very elevated B12 and/or folic acid)... those are the only ones I can think of at the moment. A chronic shift to one side of the immune system would in itself be suggestive that a virus is present, because 1 - some can create that shift to avoid the immune system, and also, if the immune system is steadily shifted to one side, odds are it is not completely fighting any of the infections, ie yeast, viruses, and often bacteria. Funny - sometimes treating yeast can even help overcome a chronic strep infection (in my experience). Even yeast has immune avoiding abilities - it blocks interleukin 12. Dr Goldberg says if a child appeared to be developing normally and then that development stalls or even regresses (ie loss of speech), then there is absolutely a disease process going on. My son's most dramatic improvement was on Diflucan, but antivirals and diet were also critical. To ignore one area would be pointless, as they all work toward reducing the triggers and stressors. In my experience, PANDAS is supposed to be treated with antibiotics, which I never received more than a 10 day dose for, but when (after 2 1/2 years of this ongoing) I was given Diflucan for a couple of weeks, the symptoms resolved! Diflucan doesn't treat PANDAS. But when I asked Dr G about this, he said that anything that helps shift that neuro-immune axis can bring about improvement. --- Rob or Sunseri <RobRose@...> wrote: > Question about your first paragraph... > > Forget metals -- is there actually a reliable test > for virals? My understanding is that since viruses > are constantly mutating, titres are not really that > accurate. I'm sure you all have seen the on-line > video of Ethan's autism recovery on Valtrex. > Ethan's blood work did not come up with any viral > markers, but they decided to just " give Valtrex a > try. " After a horrible rash and a few days of nasty > detox symptoms, Ethan began to develop normally. > His most impressive transformation occurred after 21 > days on Valtrex. He used a special diet, > anti-fungals and Valtrex for 9 months and has needed > no further meds. > > - > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 , Is the explaination below widely accepted or more of a cutting edge theory? I remember all of the controversey over CFS back when I received that diagnosis as a teenager. Dr. Stoff wrote the first book (I believe he was first) to say it was viral/auto-immune but even recently I have heard doctors scoff at the idea of CFS being an auto-immune disorder. - <thecolemans4@...> wrote: Regarding accurate testing for viral titers - titers can be helpful but not entirely accurate. Whether this is new knowledge or widely understood in immunology, I think it is forgotten or overlooked. Other labs used in conjunction together can be used to indicate chronic viruses... some of those (not limited to and not necessarily a viral marker and could be related to other disorders) - immune panel - can show a shift to type of immune cells that are activated, low natural killer cells (under 8%?), mildly elevated liver panel, CBC, low iron on Ferriten (and other markers in that panel) and B12 (or very elevated B12 and/or folic acid)... those are the only ones I can think of at the moment. A chronic shift to one side of the immune system would in itself be suggestive that a virus is present, because 1 - some can create that shift to avoid the immune system, and also, if the immune system is steadily shifted to one side, odds are it is not completely fighting any of the infections, ie yeast, viruses, and often bacteria. Funny - sometimes treating yeast can even help overcome a chronic strep infection (in my experience). Even yeast has immune avoiding abilities - it blocks interleukin 12. Dr Goldberg says if a child appeared to be developing normally and then that development stalls or even regresses (ie loss of speech), then there is absolutely a disease process going on. My son's most dramatic improvement was on Diflucan, but antivirals and diet were also critical. To ignore one area would be pointless, as they all work toward reducing the triggers and stressors. In my experience, PANDAS is supposed to be treated with antibiotics, which I never received more than a 10 day dose for, but when (after 2 1/2 years of this ongoing) I was given Diflucan for a couple of weeks, the symptoms resolved! Diflucan doesn't treat PANDAS. But when I asked Dr G about this, he said that anything that helps shift that neuro-immune axis can bring about improvement. --- Rob or Sunseri <RobRose@...> wrote: > Question about your first paragraph... > > Forget metals -- is there actually a reliable test > for virals? My understanding is that since viruses > are constantly mutating, titres are not really that > accurate. I'm sure you all have seen the on-line > video of Ethan's autism recovery on Valtrex. > Ethan's blood work did not come up with any viral > markers, but they decided to just " give Valtrex a > try. " After a horrible rash and a few days of nasty > detox symptoms, Ethan began to develop normally. > His most impressive transformation occurred after 21 > days on Valtrex. He used a special diet, > anti-fungals and Valtrex for 9 months and has needed > no further meds. > > - > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 It is not new, but has had a very hard time making it into mainstream practice. The findings in the research arena have been around a long time. They have been arguing for so long whether it is even a true medical disorder, but they are now making very solid announcements - like the genetic finding (which is associated with the immune system) that DO confirm it as a medical illness. When you can't even get doctors to accept an illness as an illness, imagine how long it will take before the word trickles down all the way to the doctor's practice! But the leading researchers are apparently all in agreement of the findings, albeit not necessarily in agreement of what to do about it. As far as the markers for chronic infection, it is how Dr G was taught in medical school at UCLA - per his words. I do believe I asked him that same question. Doctors are aware of this, but I had all these markers - documented onset of anemia (iron and B12 both) hand in hand with my chronic strep infection, and yet it still took them two years to even begin to finally think maybe they should treat me for this. So yes, it is true, but probably perceived as so " uncommon " that no average doctor takes it into consideration. I asked my son's local pediatrician about it and he was quite familiar, but that they just don't see that very often or even look for it until everything else has been tried. --- Rob or Sunseri <RobRose@...> wrote: > , > > Is the explaination below widely accepted or more > of a cutting edge theory? I remember all of the > controversey over CFS back when I received that > diagnosis as a teenager. Dr. Stoff wrote the > first book (I believe he was first) to say it was > viral/auto-immune but even recently I have heard > doctors scoff at the idea of CFS being an > auto-immune disorder. > > - > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Ray, Are those doctors 1) testing for metals and then 2) treating for viruses, then 3) testing for metals again? Kristy Re: April/was: and Chelation Hi Sharon, Thanks, we are back to a variation of " which came first, the chicken or the egg " . Just read Dr. McCandless' book where she says she gets the body more healthy through supplementation/chelation and THEN addresses viral/immunity issues. Just a question of how a particular clinician feels is the quickest way to health for a child. I do really, really, wish some dr who is doing viral/immune things could just do some testing to see if anything does get excreted. Have I said that before? Re: April/was: and Chelation , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 , How did you find this out? Is there a test? Kristy Re: April/was: and Chelation , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 MeB12 (injections or spray, I forget which) was also part of Ethan's recovery. Can anyone explain in what instances it should be tried? Thank you, Kristy Re: April/was: and Chelation Question about your first paragraph... Forget metals -- is there actually a reliable test for virals? My understanding is that since viruses are constantly mutating, titres are not really that accurate. I'm sure you all have seen the on-line video of Ethan's autism recovery on Valtrex. Ethan's blood work did not come up with any viral markers, but they decided to just " give Valtrex a try. " After a horrible rash and a few days of nasty detox symptoms, Ethan began to develop normally. His most impressive transformation occurred after 21 days on Valtrex. He used a special diet, anti-fungals and Valtrex for 9 months and has needed no further meds. - April Jagnow <april@...> wrote: Hi , I don't know if there are any studies on how or when our bodies eliminate metals. This could be in part because there isn't an agreed apon metals test to my knowledge. Some experts say to use the hair test, some say that's bogus. And I don't think a blood test will find evidence of a metal that is stored in a nerve or fat deposit. Until the experts can agree on a test, how can research be done? My comments on healthy bodies processing metals naturally in their own time come purely from my understanding of the nature of our bodies. We are all exposed to metals. Most of us process those and go on our merry way completely unaware. Our kids' bodies don't run this efficiently. Their bodies don't know how to process metals, or are too tired fighting other things to process it, so their bodies stash it. My son reacted like this to even Herpes, not trying to fight it, not even recognizing the foreign attacker in his brain. Now his body is healthy. He is fighting the Herpes. If he has metal in his system that was not processed but stored, why wouldn't his healthier body come across it and recognize it as foreign and process it as a healthy body would? Dr. Goldberg told me that my son's body would get strong and fight. I have been watching this transformation take place and have no reason to doubt his word. I can understand how this may not satisfy the need for proof for some of you, but the science behind -- the tests and treatment is very scientific and full of proof. I wouldn't mind hard scientific proof either, but to see the changes in my own house is enough for me. , best of luck to you in your search for solid answers. Sincerely, April Responsibility for the content of this message lies strictly with the original author(s), and is not necessarily endorsed by or the opinion of the Research Institute and/or the Parent Coalition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 I have misplaced the test results, but it was one of the SNPs tested when we did the genetic panel for catechol-O-methyl transferase. If I don't find it soon, I will have to ask the doctor to mail me a duplicate. - Kristy Nardini <krnardini@...> wrote: , How did you find this out? Is there a test? Kristy Re: April/was: and Chelation , Just some food for thought. I have a friend who is in the field of toxicology and we had a similar discussion about the whole mercury issue. She told me that detoxification tends to be a lower priority for a body already fighting what it perceives as bigger battles. Though I know it's not the " proof " you are looking for, it made sense to me then that, because our kids immune systems are already overloaded dealing with these other issues, detoxification might be compromised. We do know that our bodies, in good health, are capable of getting rid of some toxins. Maybe that is why our kids have so much trouble handling metal exposures as opposed to typical kids? Makes me wonder. Anyway, thinking of it this way, it makes what April said make sense. It would at least be logical to think that as our kids bodies get healthier, they are better able to detoxify themselves. Just a thought, Sharon :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.