Re: Steve / Our Conversation with WRF Foundation

[Guest guest]

--- Tigchelaar wrote:

<snip>

> Rife's results we believe were not solely because of

> the machinery he used, but also because of Rife's way of

> using the devices himself.  The so-called elusive

> " RIFE EFFECT " that many researchers keep looking

> for was most probably Rife himself.

<snip>

If you are suggesting that there was something " magical " about the way Rife used

his machines, then your statement makes no sense. Other people used Rife's

machines with equal success. If the so-called " Rife effect " was dependent on

Rife himself, it would be totally worthless; it would have died with him. From

another perspective, though, you are correct in saying that his results were due

to the way he used his devices. The way he used them was with frequencies that

were derived through rigorous laboratory research. In that sense, yes, the

" Rife effect " was due to Rife himself, but it is not elusive. Anyone who uses a

frequency machine in the same way that Rife used his machines would have the

same results that Rife had.

Regards,