Re: Study firmly ties hormone use to breast cancer

[Guest guest]

I'm sure the study is valid, but I think there is more involved, too.

> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28222004

>

> Study firmly ties hormone use to breast cancer

> Taking popular menopause pills for five years doubles risk, analysis shows

>

> Sun., Dec. 14, 2008

> SAN ANTONIO - Taking menopause hormones for five years doubles the risk for

> breast cancer, according to a new analysis of a big federal study that

> reveals the most dramatic evidence yet of the dangers of these still-popular

> pills.

>

> Even women who took estrogen and progestin pills for as little as a couple

> of years had a greater chance of getting cancer. And when they stopped

> taking them, their odds quickly improved, returning to a normal risk level

> roughly two years after quitting.

>

> Collectively, these new findings are likely to end any doubt that the risks

> outweigh the benefits for most women.

>

> [snip, more at link]

>

> Char

>

>

[Guest guest]

Of course there is. What most don't understand is that cancer is a symptom,

not a pathology per se. Varied things and conditions can cause it. Most of

the estrogen/progesterone fed theories do not take into account that a

pathogen may need these hormones to be present in order to be activated and

flourish and result in a symptom of cancer. Most in the medical community

totally over-look the " middlemen " with such theories.

doug (Mo)

Re: Study firmly ties hormone use to breast cancer

> I'm sure the study is valid, but I think there is more involved, too.

>

>

[Guest guest]

I'm glad you recognize those facets. Cancer is not only a symptom, it's an

imbalance of many things in the body (lack of proper nutrients, vitamins and

minerals, toxic metals intake - no out-take chelation, food additives,

incorrect cooking utensils - pots and pans, chlorinated - not pure spring

water, highly oil pesticided and oil based fertilized veggies and fruits,

chemically laden meats and poultry, toxic chemical intake even in the air we

breathe, fluoride, nasty dental procedures, EMF's, RF's, etc.,). The modern

mediSIN theories are just business practices to make money - not cure.

Medical ethics world-wide seem to have gone down the drain in the last 60 -

70 years - maybe even longer. If one is not on a self-oriented and informed

preventative program, God have mercy...

> Of course there is. What most don't understand is that cancer is a

> symptom,

> not a pathology per se. Varied things and conditions can cause it. Most of

> the estrogen/progesterone fed theories do not take into account that a

> pathogen may need these hormones to be present in order to be activated and

>

> flourish and result in a symptom of cancer. Most in the medical community

> totally over-look the " middlemen " with such theories.

>

> doug (Mo)

>

>

> Re: Study firmly ties hormone use to breast cancer

>

> > I'm sure the study is valid, but I think there is more involved, too.

> >

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Is that bio identical hormones or the typical synthetic analogs that are

prescribed ?

Markcg

> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28222004

>

> Study firmly ties hormone use to breast cancer

> Taking popular menopause pills for five years doubles risk, analysis shows

>

> Sun., Dec. 14, 2008

> SAN ANTONIO - Taking menopause hormones for five years doubles the risk for

> breast cancer, according to a new analysis of a big federal study that

> reveals the most dramatic evidence yet of the dangers of these still-popular

> pills.

>

> Even women who took estrogen and progestin pills for as little as a couple

> of years had a greater chance of getting cancer. And when they stopped

> taking them, their odds quickly improved, returning to a normal risk level

> roughly two years after quitting.

>

> Collectively, these new findings are likely to end any doubt that the risks

> outweigh the benefits for most women.

>

> [snip, more at link]

>

> Char

>

>

[Guest guest]

The report says " Progestin " , which I think is synthetic form of

protesterone.

Regards -

Ken

Mark Grogan wrote:

>

> Is that bio identical hormones or the typical synthetic analogs that are

> prescribed ?

>

> Markcg

>

> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:37 PM, cb <soundtree@...

> <mailto:soundtree%40alltel.net>> wrote:

>

> > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28222004

> <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28222004>

> >

> > Study firmly ties hormone use to breast cancer

> > Taking popular menopause pills for five years doubles risk, analysis

> shows

> >

> > Sun., Dec. 14, 2008

> > SAN ANTONIO - Taking menopause hormones for five years doubles the

> risk for

> > breast cancer, according to a new analysis of a big federal study that

> > reveals the most dramatic evidence yet of the dangers of these

> still-popular

> > pills.

> >

> > Even women who took estrogen and progestin pills for as little as a

> couple

> > of years had a greater chance of getting cancer. And when they stopped

> > taking them, their odds quickly improved, returning to a normal risk

> level

> > roughly two years after quitting.

> >

> > Collectively, these new findings are likely to end any doubt that

> the risks

> > outweigh the benefits for most women.

> >

> > [snip, more at link]

> >

> > Char

> >

> >