sherry b--Re: Shelvie Rettman - The Case Quoted on Quackwatch!

[Guest guest]

I can not answer that - I only know that the FSCAN does not work the

way the Plasma Plus works from the way my dog acts. I believe that

Dick Loyd is the person that is the FSCAN expert - perhaps he can

answer that. It is my understanding, from the very little I do

understand about this technology, that the FSCAN does not send

frequencies the way a plasma/tube machine does. As I said before, I

have only been involved with this technology since Oct, 2007. I have

been told by others that it is radionics.

Sherry

> are you saying the f-scan 2 is a radionics machine?? & not a rife

> machine??

>

>

> where did you get this info???

>

>

> roger

>

>

> sherry bakko wrote:

>

> I did not have good results at all - as a matter of fact, if someone

>

> else on this list would not have stepped in and 'educate' me about the

>

> FSCAN being a radionics NOT a RIFE machine - I think my dog would be

>

> dead. I have since purchased a Plasma Plus II machine and my dog is

>

> still here and does not experience any herx affects from this machine.

>

> It is almost calming to her. Before anyone 'assumes' that I was doing

>

> nothing other than RIFE, rest assured I was and am doing a multitude

>

> of other things and still am, just not buying into all the MLM

> products

>

> that were thrown at me in the beginning. The bottom line with Jeff is

>

> he started out needing $200/month to help my dog - then he needed

>

> $200/week to help my dog. No one would/could answer my question as to

>

> WHY I just purchased an FCAN II AND an ABPA (spending thousands of

>

> dollars) and still had to use the services of Jeff Southerland??? I

>

> now realize the FSCAN is NOT a RIFE/plasma machine and evidently you

>

> must be a practitioner and use a pendulum or some such device. I even

>

> asked Dale about it being a RIFE machine. I was told that the FSCAN II

>

> was being used in Switzerland in hospitals and insurance was even

>

> paying for them to be used - so I now realize the question was skirted

>

> around quite well. I am new to the rife world - since October! I

>

> hope that others that are new realize that RIFE and RADIONICS are two

>

> completely different types of machines. This is a RIFE list - is it

>

> not???? I never heard of radionics before now. I THOUGHT I was

>

> purchasing a rife machine. It seems there is plenty of 'omission of

>

> facts' to answer questions. I have learned a lot in a short amount of

>

> time. I now realize there is politics and money making ventures in

>

> this field just like any other. I just wanted to get my dog better.

>

> Too me, Shelvie isn't doing anything different than what is happening

>

> on this very list and to me and my dog.

>

>

> Sherry

>

>

> PS - BTW, I live approximately 1 hours from Prior Lake, MN - if there

>

> is something that I can get from any court house - I would be happy to

>

> help in any way I can.

>

>

>

>

>

> >

>

> > For that amount of money, I sure hope you've had some

>

> > very good results. Can you tell us a little about the

>

> > results you've had with this method? Is your dog

>

> > cured?

>

> > Regards,

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

The F-scan is not a radionics device, but it does have

fundamental design flaws that produce erroneous

results when scanning for frequencies.

Regards,

--- sherry bakko wrote:

>

> I can not answer that - I only know that the FSCAN

> does not work the

> way the Plasma Plus works from the way my dog acts.

> I believe that

> Dick Loyd is the person that is the FSCAN expert -

> perhaps he can

> answer that. It is my understanding, from the very

> little I do

> understand about this technology, that the FSCAN

> does not send

> frequencies the way a plasma/tube machine does. As

> I said before, I

> have only been involved with this technology since

> Oct, 2007. I have

> been told by others that it is radionics.

[Guest guest]

--- Nenah Sylver wrote:

> ,

> I have found the following formula quite useful. It

> bypasses the design flaws and gives, in my

> experience, accurate results. The DIRPS are divided

> into two sections, in case there are a lot of hits.

>

> F-Scan settings to avoid repeating numbers from

> hardware problems

>

> F-Scan 1 (black unit)

>

> DIRP 2

>

> Frequency Maximum: 755,610

> Frequency Minimum: 417,288

>

> Delta: 678

<snip>

I'm familiar with this, but I don't agree that it's a

true " bypass " . It's more of a " better than nothing "

workaround. It also doesn't address the fact that the

testing voltage is too high. In EAV testing, which

the F-scan tries to emulate, it is known that anything

more than 1.5 volts polarizes the point. If I

remember correctly, the F-scan uses about 6 volts in

its testing signal. While it doesn't test on

acupuncture points, I think 6 volts is still too high

for testing. I think it has also been shown that the

waveform output isn't very pure.

In my opinion, it is inexcusable for a device as

expensive as the F-scan to have such design flaws,

especially since these flaws have been brought to the

attention of the manufacturer. These flaws should

have been corrected long ago.

There are some who are fond of mentioning that the

F-scan is European CE certified, the implication being

that this somehow makes it more credible or effective.

CE certification is just as meaningless as FDA

certification, in my opinion anyway.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

--- sherry bakko wrote:

>

> Can or would you elaborate on what the fundamental

> flaws are? And what

> sort of erroneous results?

Read the following analysis:

http://www.scoon.co.uk/Electrotherapy/fscan.htm

Also, join the F-scan group and read the files from

Stephan Fuelling.

> So, is it a RIFE machine?

No. As I keep repeating, at present, there's no such

thing as a Rife machine, unless of course someone can

prove it.

> How would or does a new person even begin to wade

> through all this stuff?

Patiently, rationally, and with a little help from

your friends in the Rife community. And don't be so

quick to lay out your money. About 18 years ago, I

was ready to lay down $1700 US for one of Crane's

machines. It was only by fluke that I found more

information that showed that it was not the same as

what Rife had done. We've come a long way since then.

Regards,

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

That is a very admirable and sadly much needed fight it seems.

Best wishes

Barbara

Lately, it seems like

> instead of working to continue advancing our

> understanding of Rife's work, all I've been doing is

> fighting against those who continue to misrepresent

> it.

>

> Regards,

>

>

>

>