Guest guest Posted May 9, 2008 Report Share Posted May 9, 2008 Insurers have come up with P4P measurements that are being touted as proxies for how good of a job we are doing. While there is use in these measurements I ask if they are really worth measuring? Doing so detracts us from being physicians and forces us into an accounting role. Furthermore, are businesses that are paying the premiums to the insurers really interested in these results or would they be interested in a different set of metrics? For starters, I would suggest there is scant evidence that the P4P questions are proven to be good proxies for health. Asking if a doc prescribed a beta blocker is less valuable than knowing if the patient is taking the medicine. Also, I think that the businesses paying the premiums are not interested if I ordered the echo. They are interested if I have open access scheduling. I think this initial generation of measurements is misguided and off the mark. While it is clearly important to prescribe the aspirin, measuring if I am doing so is not very useful because at the end of the day because it's the patient who determines his/her outcomes more than I do. I think we need to move away from doctor centric measurements and closer towards patient centric measurements. Patient centric measurements serve dual purposes in that they raise awareness (why do I need to take the aspirin) and serve to inform us on what we need to focus on when the patient is in front of us (my patient is not taking the aspirin). Lowell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.