Guest guest Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 well I thought everyone used caqhI do it- fairly easy to do online excpet if they have a mistake in tthere about your address or something it can take 16 calls and 6 mo to fix it--personal experience. MY two insurancs use CAQH Except one of the two also made me go somewhere else also Another organization The maze of organziations that credential or prfoile or take money from someone for something staggers my mind!! Thi s is the Council on Affordable Health Quality they do credentiallingWe also seem to have a mysterious mednet here in maine which has casued me no end of trouble and the hospitlas all use one stop shopping Synernet but I have to do all three!! what a waste of time and money all these duplicative services that only serve to provide jobs for underlings Everyone needs a copy of every document and they are all so self serving AT my time and expense. wanna know what I r eally think?Jean I think the hospirtal that I am on staff with uses this. Cyrus Peikari wrote: https://caqh.geoaccess.com/oas/Anyone else using CAQH?So far it's been useful for automatic credentialing with insurance plans for me as an individual doc.However, one limitation is that it doesn't seem to support group credentialing for plans that require it that way (I am a one person Corp.)Cyrus Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. -- If you are a patient please allow up to 4-8 hours for a reply by email/please note the new email address/e mail may not be entirely secure/ MD ph fax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2008 Report Share Posted April 24, 2008 We are using CAQH; we are set up as a 1-person S-Corp. I believe that CAQH is only used for credentialing individual physicians and then all we have had to do in the past was to request a group contract, with Steve as the only provider in the group. CAQH is required for some of our insurers in CA in order to become a participating provider; all of our contracts are through the group TIN. CAQH is definitely much easier than completing the individual applications. Pratt San Ramon, CA From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Cyrus Peikari Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 5:05 PM To: Subject: CAQH https://caqh.geoaccess.com/oas/ Anyone else using CAQH? So far it's been useful for automatic credentialing with insurance plans for me as an individual doc. However, one limitation is that it doesn't seem to support group credentialing for plans that require it that way (I am a one person Corp.) Cyrus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.