[Fwd: Brain Studies Reveal Mechanisms Of Voluntary Control Of Visual Attention]

[Guest guest]

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brain Studies Reveal Mechanisms Of Voluntary Control Of Visual Attention

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070103201317.htm

Science Daily <http://www.sciencedaily.com/> -- Neuroscientists at Duke

University have mapped the timing and sequence of neural activations

that unfold in the brain when people focus their attention on specific

locations in their visual fields.

The findings may point the way for clinicians to address

attention-related problems, said study team member Marty Woldorff,

associate director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and an

associate professor in psychiatry.

" There are a number of clinical syndromes where attention is

dysfunctional, including schizophrenia, autism and attention

deficit-hyperactivity disorder, " Woldorff said. " Moreover, attentional

capabilities change during normal and abnormal aging. "

The findings appear in the January 2007 issue of the journal Public

Library of Science (PLoS) Biology. The research was supported by the

National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute of

Neurological Diseases and Stroke.

In this study, the researchers combined information from two different

technologies for measuring brain activity in order to provide insight

into the basic mechanisms by which humans orient and focus their visual

spatial attention.

" At every moment of our lives, we are deluged with sensory stimuli

coming from multiple directions, " Woldorff and study co-investigator

Tineke Grent-'t-Jong wrote in the journal report. Grent-'t-Jong is a

research associate at Duke's Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and a

graduate student in psychopharmacology at the University of Utrecht in

the Netherlands.

This sensory deluge encompasses " much more information than we can fully

process, " they said. " The critical function of attention allows us at

each moment to continuously select and extract the most important

information from this flood of sensory inputs. "

An example of the kind of focused visual attention the researchers

investigated is what happens as a motorist watches traffic in front of

his car while also monitoring out of the corner of his eye the movement

of a bicyclist pedaling on the side of the road. This example is

illustrated on Woldorff's laboratory website at

http://www.mind.duke.edu/faculty/woldorff/.

" When we direct our attention to such specific locations or events -- in

this case, the bicyclist off to the side -- we tend to more quickly

discriminate or detect changes there than at other locations in our

visual field that are not so attended, " Woldorff said.

Previous studies, including several by the Duke researchers, have

associated such attentional processes with brain activity that occurs in

what is called the " frontal-parietal attentional control network. " This

network comprises areas of nerve cells located in the front portion and

the upper rear, or parietal, portion of the brain.

Previous studies also have indicated that areas of the visual cortex,

located in the lower rear part of the brain, preferentially process

information coming from locations or objects in the visual field where

attention is directed.

Those studies have additionally suggested that the frontal-parietal

network may induce this improved processing in the visual areas by means

of some " biasing " or enhancing signal.

But " little is known about the timing and sequence of activations within

this frontal-parietal network and their temporal relationship to any

such biasing, " the Duke scientists said in their report.

They said the uncertainty about such characteristics is due mainly to

specific technical limitations of two of the main technologies currently

used to monitor brain activity in humans: functional magnetic resonance

imaging (fMRI) and event-related potential (ERP) recordings.

Although fMRI can pinpoint the locations of such brain activity by

measuring changes in regional blood flow associated with increased

neural activity, the technology is " very limited as to the timing

information it can provide, " Woldorff said. " The reason is that it takes

multiple seconds for blood flow to change and to yield a measurable fMRI

signal. "

ERP recordings, which are extracted from electroencephalography (EEG)

recordings made at the scalp of electrical activity in the brain, can

reflect the brain's responses to sensory and cognitive events with

millisecond precision, he said. But the electrical brain activations

detected with ERPs are harder to trace back to their exact origins

inside the brain.

To overcome these limitations, Grent-'t-Jong and Woldorff combined brain

responses from the two technologies recorded in identical experiments.

" To effectively understand how the brain accomplishes cognitive

functions, it is critical to be able to delineate both the brain regions

that are involved and the timing and sequence of their activations, "

Woldorff explained.

In the experiments, participants were asked to keep their gaze directed

toward the center of a computer screen. They then were presented with a

series of four-second trials, each beginning with the appearance of an

" instructional " letter cue that the participants had been coached on how

to interpret. For example, participants might be shown an " L " cue

instructing them to focus their attention " covertly " -- that is, without

moving their eyes -- to a location on the left side of the screen.

Most such letter cues instructed participants to direct their attention

to a specific location on the screen and be alert for a possible faint

dot " target " that might appear there during the following second or two.

During some trials, however, the cue directed participants not to orient

their attention to a particular location because no target would be

appearing on that trial.

In all of the trials, participants had to decode and interpret the

meaning of the instructional letter cue. But only in response to

attention-directing cues did participants also orient their visual

attention. As a result, the researchers were able to separate brain

activity specifically related to attentional orienting from activity

associated with general cue processing.

The fMRI findings -- first reported in January 2004 in the Journal of

Cognitive Neuroscience -- showed that lateral parts of the

frontal-parietal network were more involved in " cue interpretation, "

Woldorff said. Meanwhile, regions of the network closer to the brain's

midline were more specifically involved in " attentional orienting. "

But since fMRI recordings cannot delineate the relative timing of these

activations, the researchers launched their current study, which

followed the same experimental design used in the earlier study but

incorporated time-sensitive ERP recordings.

The study revealed that both the attention-directing cues and the

" no-target-will-appear " cues evoked similar electrical activity during

the first 300-400 milliseconds following their appearance on the screen.

After that, electrical brain activity for the " no-target-will-appear "

cues quickly ebbed away, whereas activity for attention-directing cues

continued for an extended period.

According to Grent-'t-Jong and Woldorff, these results indicated that

the initial electrical response up to 400 milliseconds mainly reflected

general cue processing activity. In contrast, the later continuing

electrical activity was due primarily to the participants' following the

attention-directing cue's instruction to covertly orient attention to

the left or right side of the screen.

The prolonged response to the attention-directing cues began initially

over only the front part of the scalp, later extending to parietal scalp

areas over the top and upper rear of the head. This pattern of ERP

activity suggested an initial start of attentional orienting in frontal

areas only, followed by joint activity in both frontal and parietal

attentional control brain areas, Woldorff said. Additional computer

analysis combining both the fMRI and ERP recordings confirmed this sequence.

The brain activity recordings also indicated that the attentional

orienting activity in the frontal-parietal network regions was followed

by increased activity in the visual cortex, prior to the occurrence of

any visual target stimulus.

Woldorff said activity in the visual cortex before the target is even

presented seems to reflect a preparatory biasing of those sensory brain

regions to facilitate processing for a possible upcoming target.

Moreover, this biasing activity was exclusive to the part of visual

cortex corresponding to the region of space where the upcoming target

would appear.

These results indicate that specific regions of the frontal cortex

activate first, followed by the parietal cortex, in a sequence that

initiates the shifting of the focus of visual attention in space,

according to Woldorff. " Those frontal and parietal areas then seem to

work together to exercise control over the sensory inputs at the early

stages of the visual pathways, " he said.

This control appears to prime the appropriate brain areas to more fully

process certain aspects of the visual scene, he said. In this particular

study, the priming was for a certain region of the visual field. In

other circumstances, the brain might be primed for a certain color or shape.

In the case of the researchers' hypothetical motorist and bicyclist,

" such enhanced processing might then enable the motorist to make a

faster accident-avoiding response if the bicyclist suddenly made an

unexpected movement toward the car, " Woldorff said.

" Or, once upon a time, it may have helped our prehistoric ancestors

forage for berries while carefully maintaining attention on a distant,

hopefully not too hungry, lion. "

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by Duke

University.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Join our listserv! Don't get your news second hand! Get LINKED!

http://lists.autismlink.com/lists <http://lists.autismlink.com/lists/>

If imitation is the highest form of flattery, we're flattered daily!

To unsubscribe from this list visit this link

<http://lists.autismlink.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe & uid=3371b33a14ff40f0f32c9befce\

6356d8>

To update your preferences visit this link

<http://lists.autismlink.com/lists/?p=preferences & uid=3371b33a14ff40f0f32c9befce\

6356d8>

AutismLink gives credit where credit is due, however, not everyone holds

themselves to these standards. Therefore -- all Website and e-mail

design, text, graphics, the selection and arrangement thereof, is

Copyright© 2005. AutismLink.com. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Permission must be

granted in writing to electronically copy and/or print in hard copy

portions of this Website. Any other use of materials on this Web site --

including reproduction for purposes without consent, modification,

distribution, or republication--without the prior written permission of

AutismLink.com is strictly prohibited.

ALL LOGOS ON AUTISMLINK'S WEBSITE ARE COPYRIGHTED.

powered by phplist <http://www.phplist.com> v 2.10.2, © tincan ltd

<http://tincan.co.uk/powered>