Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 In a message dated 3/8/2006 3:17:22 PM Central Standard Time, quinn.cat1968@... writes: <<Dr Jang like this in her testimonial on the clay for autism site, because she said it is so much safer then DMPS and DMSO chelation. >> I realize this is off-topic for the list but this statement represents something that's kind of a pet peeve to me. So often, on internet lists, I see that a professional or doctor says something is so much " safer " or " more effective " than what is traditionally used but doesn't have much to back it up. To my knowledge, these clay baths have never been studied while DMPS has been studied. While it seems logical that taking a bath in clay would be safer than taking a drug, can you really know this for sure if one has been studied and the other hasn't been studied? Gaylen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2006 Report Share Posted March 10, 2006 on the chelatingkids2 list there have been many parents who have tried the clay baths and have seen good results; some have seen nothing. i dont recall reading any posts that stated anything negative though (if my memory serves me correctly). it's like everything else, what works for one may not for another, and so on. every child is different. some parents want to try but are understandably skeptical. i have purchased the clays a while ago, but have never used them. im researching other things currently. vicki Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.