Guest guest Posted May 3, 2011 Report Share Posted May 3, 2011 The epidemiological and political benefits of diluting the definition of autism. - - - - " Autism epidemic " challenged by UK research By Frederik ving NEW YORK | Mon May 2, 2011 4:17pm EDT http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/02/us-autism-idUSTRE7416XC20110502 NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - A national UK survey out Monday found no traces of an " autism epidemic, " despite earlier reports that the developmental disorder has been rising quickly in recent decades. Researchers found nearly one percent of Britons older than 16 years have autism, a rate that is similar to that seen in children. Younger people were no more likely to be affected than older ones, however, which would have been expected if the condition were truly on the increase..... " None of them had been diagnosed (previously) with autism, " he said. " I think for me the issue is that people have been ignoring autism in adulthood and only focusing on children. " SOURCE: Epidemiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Adults in the Community in England Abstract <http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/68/5/459> - - - - see also: */Human sponges soaking up dangerous chemicals/* By Hanley, Special to The StarPheonix May 3, 2011 6:03 AM http://www.thestarphoenix.com/technology/Human%20sponges%20soaking%20dangerous%2\ 0chemicals/4715986/story.html A bout 100,000 manufactured chemicals are in use around the world, according to the UN Environment Program, and every year as many as 2,000 new ones are introduced. Between 1930 and today annual global production of manmade chemicals increased from one million tonnes to over 500 million tonnes now worth $3.7 trillion. People are a little like sponges and most of us have traces of about 400 of these chemicals in our bodies, says local physician and medical educator ph Schnurr. While we are not always sure what these trace chemicals are doing to us, it is becoming increasingly clear it is not always good. Schnurr, who has practised medicine in Saskatoon since 1987, reports he has personally seen a gradual increase in patients who are chronically fatigued, show hormonal imbalances and have liver problems. When he could see no obvious explanation for their health issues he was prompted to study the possibility of a connection to chemical overload.... The huge chemical industry clearly influences government decisions. And, by the way, the same companies that make the chemicals also produce drugs used to treat the illness they likely cause. Draw whatever conclusions from that you may. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.