Guest guest Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 The new study is relevant to the issue of vaccinations & autism because, generally, vaccination/autism studies intended to find no proof of harm fail to cite studies providing evidence of harm. Of course, bashing Wakefield et al 1998 was a medical-industry group effort, even as most studies documenting thimerosal's harm are ignored. - - - - A systematic examination of the citation of prior research in reports of randomized, controlled trials. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21200038> KA, Goodman SN. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jan 4;154(1):50-5. - - - - */ Trial in a Vacuum: Study of Studies Shows Few Citations/* By GINA KOLATA http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/health/research/18cite.html Science, so the story goes, is a meticulously built edifice. Discoveries balance on ones that preceded them. Research is stimulated by studies that went on before. But what, then, can explain the findings by two investigators at s Hopkins University School of Medicine? The researchers, A. and Dr. N. Goodman, looked at how often published papers on clinical trials in medicine cite previous clinical trials addressing the same question. They report in the Jan. 4 issue of ls of Internal Medicine what Dr. Goodman describes as " a rather shocking result. " He summarizes: " No matter how many randomized clinical trials have been done on a particular topic, about half the clinical trials cite none or only one of them. " .... .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.