/was: /was:Re: neuroimmune research

[Guest guest]

You were violating HIPPA Laws- I am sorry if you believe that is

just my husband. I did not call you any names but that you

misrepresented yourself. If fame and credit was what he was after you

never met my husband.

My attitude is that of a cancer survivor that puts all her time in to

help the children and bring new drugs to trial, if that is shameful

oh well! If my ego offends you I guess you have never dealt with a

women who has cut her breasts off from cancer and still puts the

children above her life.

Science is all going neuro-immune not just my husband

You posts should have been banned from the list as off treatments are

not discussed here. There are many lists. Moderators are back in

place here and things should settle down. The original list creator

is back in charge (I am not involved) but you never answered my

question. What were you trying to do?

Elyse Goldberg

-- In , " Cochran " <Ladyshrink111@...>

wrote:

>

> Elyse and group:

>

> I implied nor said nor meant to imply or say no such thing.

>

> My posts have been respectful and considerate. I believe your

husband's contribution has merit and said so. How do you dare call me

names?

>

> Your attitude is a good example of people who care more about ego

and fame and credit and money than the children. Your comments are

shameful!

>

> There is reputable science to prove more than your husband's

contributions. Think about the children.

>

>

>

>

> Re: /was:Re: neuroimmune

> > research

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ,

> > > > > > I can only speak for myself but I would like to

see

> > the

> > > > answers

> > > > > to s

> > > > > > questions on-list. I am not offended by

> information.

> > > Many

> > > > > times others ask

> > > > > > questions that I need answers to also. Thanks

for

> > > sharing

> > > > this

> > > > > healthy

> > > > > > discussion. Anything that might help our kids

and it

> > is

> > > >

> > > > > related. N.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Responsibility for the content of this message

lies

> > > > strictly

> > > > > with

> > > > > > the original author(s), and is not necessarily

> > endorsed

> > > by

> > > > or

> > > > > the

> > > > > > opinion of the Research Institute and/or the

>

> > > > Parent

> > > > > Coalition.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >