Guest guest Posted March 15, 2012 Report Share Posted March 15, 2012 Is it safe to play yet? <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/15/garden/going-to-extreme-lengths-to-purge-hous\ ehold-toxins.html> MacCleery was four months pregnant when she started an inventory of the chemicals in her andria, Va., town house. First, she collected 70 products in a pile: things like makeup, shampoo, and sink cleaners. Then she typed the names of the cosmetics into an online database called Skin Deep. The results were not comforting. see also: Protecting, nourishing fluid can also expose fetuses to chemicals. <http://greatlakesecho.org/2012/03/15/protecting-nourishing-fluid-can-also-expos\ e-fetuses-to-chemicals/> Researchers tested the amniotic fluid of 15 pregnant women in southeast Michigan for flame retardant chemicals called PBDEs. Amniotic fluid both cushions fetuses and provides nutrients for development. The chemicals were in every sample. Low doses, big effects: Scientists seek 'fundamental changes' in testing, regulation of hormone-like chemicals. <http://bit.ly/x4bGYO> By Marla Cone Environmental Health News 15 March 2012 Small doses can have big health effects. That is a main finding of a new report, three years in the making, published Wednesday by a team of 12 scientists who study hormone-altering chemicals. " Fundamental changes in chemical testing are needed to protect human health, " they wrote. After examining hundreds of studies, the researchers concluded that health effects " are remarkably common " when people or animals are exposed to low doses of endocrine-disrupting compounds. As examples, they provide evidence for several controversial chemicals, including bisphenol A, found in polycarbonate plastic, canned foods and paper receipts, and the pesticide atrazine, used in large volumes mainly on corn. Opinion: 'There are no safe doses for endocrine disruptors.' <http://bit.ly/yzjnqK> By Vandenberg Environmental Health News 15 March 2012 As a scientist, I am often asked what " proof " links hormone-altering chemicals to diseases and birth defects. One mother questions whether exposures during her pregnancy caused her child's autism. Another asks whether chemicals in the foods she ate could have caused her son's abnormal genitalia. The underlying question raised by these mothers is provocative: Do small amounts contribute to human health problems? My colleagues and I have concluded in a new report that there truly are no safe doses for hormone-altering chemicals. Academic, regulatory and industry scientists must work together to identify and replace such chemicals that are ubiquitous in everyday consumer products. Reducing and eventually eliminating these exposures is absolutely needed to protect human health. Long-lived epigenetic interactions between perinatal PBDE exposure and Mecp2308 mutation. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22343140> Woods R, Vallero RO, Golub M, Suarez JK, Ta TA, Yasui DH, Chi LH, Kostyniak PJ, Pessah IN, Berman RF, Lasalle JM. Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Feb 15 Preliminary evidence of the in vitro effects of BDE-47 on innate immune responses in children with autism spectrum disorders. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19211157> Ashwood P, Schauer J, Pessah IN, Van de Water J. J Neuroimmunol. 2009 Mar 31;208(1-2):130-5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.