Re: Heavy metals test scheme laid bare.

[Guest guest]

Barrett is a fraud..........

Quackbusting " - is a Profitable Business...

ly, " quackbusting " is a profitable industry, and Barrett

plays it to the hilt.

In a Canadian lawsuit (see below) Barrett admitted to the following:

" The sole purpose of the activities of Barrett & Baratz are to

discredit and cause damage and harm to health care practitioners,

businesses that make alternative health therapies or products

available, and advocates of non-allopathic therapies and health

freedom. "

Barrett testifies for money. He claims he's an " expert " in

virtually everything. Those " expert witness " fees seem to be a

significant part of Barrett's existence.

In a California Court case, former Barrett peer, and fellow Board

Member of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF),

Jarvis PhD, testified, under oath, that Barrett and

Baratz conspired to use the NCAHF, without Board permission, as a

Plaintiff in over 40 cases in California, where Barrett and Baratz

were to testify as " expert witnesses, " and get expert witness fees.

The NCAHF Board was never consulted.

However, sometimes their plans fail.

One of those cases caused the NCAHF to be saddled with over $100,000

in legal fees awarded their victim - and the NCAHF doesn't have the

money to pay that debt. In fact, the NCAHF is SO DESPERATE for funds

it is being run out of a cardboard box in the back room of

Baratz's Braintree, Massachusetts hair removal and ear piercing salon.

Those type of cases Barrett involved the NCAHF in were considered so

heinous that the people of California just passed an initiative

(Proposition #64) banning this kind of lawsuit for all time.

Barrett's claim to be a Consumer Advocate is an insult to American

consumers.

Organized Stupidity is the Hallmark of the Quackbuster Conspiracy...

Barrett, and his vacuous minions, like to spout off other

stupid " rules " that they think should apply to health care - the

application of which, has to make the scientific community shudder.

One of the other totally BRAINLESS statements Barrett, and his

parrotts, like to to screech out is " It hasn't been double-blind

studied!! "

The " double-blind study " is one of about 45 different kinds of

scientific studies used, and approved for use, within the scientific

community. It was designed for, and is usually restricted to,

testing new dangerous drugs for the claims drug companies wish to

make about their new laboratory produced products. Generally, in

this type of study, you give half of the group the new pill, and the

other half gets a sugar pill that looks just like the original. This

type of study simply does not apply to new research. Never has,

never will.

And worse, the " double-blind study " is considered to be heinous, and

was banned by world government during the Helsinki Accord in 1964.

There's a lot more...

Barrett's Funding - TOP SECRET...

Barrett was cornered in a Federal case in the State of Oregon not

long ago, and asked about his income. He testified that over the

past two years he made a TOTAL of $54,000.

How then does he afford to carry on fourteen (14) separate legal

actions at one time?

If each legal action cost him $100,000, that would come to 1.4

million dollars ($1,400,000).

How do you squeeze 1.4 million out of a $54,000 total income?

Good question...

..

In , " elyse14 " <elyse-g@...> wrote:

>

> Heavy metals test scheme laid bare.

>

> Quackwatch has taken a close look at how the " Urine Toxic Metals "

> test is used to trick people into thinking that they have lead or

> mercury poisoning and need " detoxification " with chelation therapy.

> The heart of the process is " provoked " testing in which a chelating

> agent is given before the specimen is obtained. This artificially

> raises the levels of heavy metals in the urine. The test report, a

copy

> of which is given to the patient, states that its " reference

values "

> are for non-provoked specimens. However, if a test level exceeds

the

> reference values, it is reported as " elevated " even though it

should be

> considered insignificant. [barrett S. How the " Urine Toxic Metals "

test

> is used to defraud patients. Quackwatch, Feb 18, 2009]

>

http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/urine_toxic.ht

ml

>

[Guest guest]

>

> do not take seriously anything by quackwatch, those people are morons

>

> natasa

>

>

>

> Heavy metals test scheme laid bare.

>

> Quackwatch has taken a close look at how the " Urine Toxic Metals "

> test is used to trick people into thinking that they have lead or

> mercury poisoning and need " detoxification " with chelation therapy.

> The heart of the process is " provoked " testing in which a chelating

> agent is given before the specimen is obtained. This artificially

> raises the levels of heavy metals in the urine. The test report, a copy

> of which is given to the patient, states that its " reference values "

> are for non-provoked specimens. However, if a test level exceeds the

> reference values, it is reported as " elevated " even though it should be

> considered insignificant. [barrett S. How the " Urine Toxic Metals " test

> is used to defraud patients. Quackwatch, Feb 18, 2009]

> http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/urine_toxic.html

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

how do you know???

just curious if you have any proof.

-

--- Neno/Natasa <neno@...> wrote:

> >

> > do not take seriously anything by quackwatch,

> those people are morons

> >

> > natasa

> >

> >

> >

> > Heavy metals test scheme laid bare.

> >

> > Quackwatch has taken a close look at how the

> " Urine Toxic Metals "

> > test is used to trick people into thinking that

> they have lead or

> > mercury poisoning and need " detoxification " with

> chelation therapy.

> > The heart of the process is " provoked " testing in

> which a chelating

> > agent is given before the specimen is obtained.

> This artificially

> > raises the levels of heavy metals in the urine.

> The test report, a copy

> > of which is given to the patient, states that its

> " reference values "

> > are for non-provoked specimens. However, if a test

> level exceeds the

> > reference values, it is reported as " elevated "

> even though it should be

> > considered insignificant. [barrett S. How the

> " Urine Toxic Metals " test

> > is used to defraud patients. Quackwatch, Feb 18,

> 2009]

> >

>

http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/urine_toxic.html

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

May the Lord bless you and keep you!

Visit my blog

http://bloominwhereyourplanted.blogspot.com/

[Guest guest]

>

> no time to go into details but spending half an hour on the their website

> gives tons of proof. Spend another half hour reading on their backgrounds and

> what they attacked in the past to get few more tons of evidence of what type

> of saddos they are. Anything written on that website I would take with more

> than a pinch of salt. And especially anything written by Barrett.

>

> natasa

>

>

>

> how do you know???

> just curious if you have any proof.

>

> -

>

> --- Neno/Natasa <neno@... <mailto:neno%40dalmaholidays.co.uk>

> > wrote:

>

>>> > >

>>> > > do not take seriously anything by quackwatch,

>> > those people are morons

>>> > >

>>> > > natasa

>>> > >

>>> > >

>>> > >

>>> > > Heavy metals test scheme laid bare.

>>> > >

>>> > > Quackwatch has taken a close look at how the

>> > " Urine Toxic Metals "

>>> > > test is used to trick people into thinking that

>> > they have lead or

>>> > > mercury poisoning and need " detoxification " with

>> > chelation therapy.

>>> > > The heart of the process is " provoked " testing in

>> > which a chelating

>>> > > agent is given before the specimen is obtained.

>> > This artificially

>>> > > raises the levels of heavy metals in the urine.

>> > The test report, a copy

>>> > > of which is given to the patient, states that its

>> > " reference values "

>>> > > are for non-provoked specimens. However, if a test

>> > level exceeds the

>>> > > reference values, it is reported as " elevated "

>> > even though it should be

>>> > > considered insignificant. [barrett S. How the

>> > " Urine Toxic Metals " test

>>> > > is used to defraud patients. Quackwatch, Feb 18,

>> > 2009]

>>> > >

>> >

> http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/urine_toxic.html

>>> > >

>>> > >

>>> > >

>>> > >

>>> > >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been

>> > removed]

>> >

>> >

>

> May the Lord bless you and keep you!

>

> Visit my blog

>

> http://bloominwhereyourplanted.blogspot.com/

>

>

>

>

>