Guest guest Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 This is along the lines of what Dr. Pall talks about in his book that discusses a theory that explains unexplained illnesses like Fibromyalgia, CFS, MCS, Gulf-war syndrome and soon he will talk about autism as in that same category (Mrs. on told me there was a paper coming about it??). I believe it is even discussed on that Environmental Illness website. My daughter has some chemical sensitivities, too...After all, Multiple Chemical sensitivity is an immune dysfunction. I think this is some interesting stuff! Thanks for sharing! - > > > Hi, > > I just came across this website that a person with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) put together explaining the results of a brain SPECT scan he got done. > > > > The brain SPECT scan images posted in this web page are very similar to the ones from my son's first brain SPECT scan. I also noticed that in some of Dr. Goldberg's presentation slides there are a few brain SPECT scan images and they also look very similar too. Does this mean that all these people have the same temporal lobe hypoperfusion? Is this coincidence? Do almost all neurodegenerative diseases have the same characteristics? > > > > http://www.ei-resource.org/myblog/SPECT-Scan-of-Multiple-Chemical-Sensitivity-MC\ S-Patient-Brain.html > > > > Thanks, > JR > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 Hahaha- I'm laughing because I was shocked to see this post on here. That is MY brain, and those are my SPECT scan pictures. It has taken time to realize that my true problem is Chemical and food sensitivity. I've tried the protocols and have no success... BUT my immune panels were a little different from some of the people I have read on here. It has taken months and even years of reading to realize this. So yes, that is my SPECT scan, and yes MCS patients have the same hypoperfusion that the patients do... In fact there came out a study saying this... http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=autism-rise-driven-by-environme\ nt I SERIOUSLY think that one thing Dr. Goldberg leaves out of his program and doesn't focus on much is CHEMICALS and artifical exposure to substances. It is heavily backed up by research- and I haven't heard him mention anything about it. Although I have a lot of faith in Dr. Goldberg and feel he has been quite cutting edge and ahead of the curve of so many of the health experts.... I STRONGLY believe this is one area he is 'missing the boat' on. I believe this holds a big key to getting healthy, and ignoring it is to the detriment of the children. I encourage ALL to read this article... I think it is VERY important. Thanks for taking time to notice my scans, it helps me believe it is educating others. Thanks, - > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I just came across this website that a person with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) put together explaining the results of a brain SPECT scan he got done. > > > > > > > > The brain SPECT scan images posted in this web page are very similar to the ones from my son's first brain SPECT scan. I also noticed that in some of Dr. Goldberg's presentation slides there are a few brain SPECT scan images and they also look very similar too. Does this mean that all these people have the same temporal lobe hypoperfusion? Is this coincidence? Do almost all neurodegenerative diseases have the same characteristics? > > > > > > > > http://www.ei-resource.org/myblog/SPECT-Scan-of-Multiple-Chemical-Sensitivity-MC\ S-Patient-Brain.html > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > JR > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 Hi , Thanks for sharing this. What kinds of treatments are there for MCS? When my son was early in to Dr G's protocol, we had a discussion about how you can't change our toxic world, but you can work on the body(via the immune system) and change the way the body responds to the world. Kristy Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Re: SPECT Scan of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) Patient Brain Hahaha- I'm laughing because I was shocked to see this post on here. That is MY brain, and those are my SPECT scan pictures. It has taken time to realize that my true problem is Chemical and food sensitivity. I've tried the protocols and have no success... BUT my immune panels were a little different from some of the people I have read on here. It has taken months and even years of reading to realize this. So yes, that is my SPECT scan, and yes MCS patients have the same hypoperfusion that the patients do... In fact there came out a study saying this... http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=autism-rise-driven-by-environme\ nt I SERIOUSLY think that one thing Dr. Goldberg leaves out of his program and doesn't focus on much is CHEMICALS and artifical exposure to substances. It is heavily backed up by research- and I haven't heard him mention anything about it. Although I have a lot of faith in Dr. Goldberg and feel he has been quite cutting edge and ahead of the curve of so many of the health experts.... I STRONGLY believe this is one area he is 'missing the boat' on. I believe this holds a big key to getting healthy, and ignoring it is to the detriment of the children. I encourage ALL to read this article... I think it is VERY important. Thanks for taking time to notice my scans, it helps me believe it is educating others. Thanks, - > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I just came across this website that a person with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) put together explaining the results of a brain SPECT scan he got done. > > > > > > > > The brain SPECT scan images posted in this web page are very similar to the ones from my son's first brain SPECT scan. I also noticed that in some of Dr. Goldberg's presentation slides there are a few brain SPECT scan images and they also look very similar too. Does this mean that all these people have the same temporal lobe hypoperfusion? Is this coincidence? Do almost all neurodegenerative diseases have the same characteristics? > > > > > > > > http://www.ei-resource.org/myblog/SPECT-Scan-of-Multiple-Chemical-Sensitivity-MC\ S-Patient-Brain.html > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > JR > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 , That is so funny that we are looking at your scans!!! My daughter is being treated for food and chemical sensitivity right now (she has the ASD diagnosis...I should say " had " ) and the NY office treats this. Antidepressants and antihistamines did not work for her and my daughter is EXTREMELY sensitive. Even the chemicals in the drugs cause an issue. I am wondering what you are doing for your MCS. Have you read Dr. Pall's book about Explaining Unexplained Illnesses?? I found it really helped me understand what was going on in part, with my daughter. Hope you will share what is working for you! People need to know! Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just came across this website that a person with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) put together explaining the results of a brain SPECT scan he got done. > > > > > > > > > > > > The brain SPECT scan images posted in this web page are very similar to the ones from my son's first brain SPECT scan. I also noticed that in some of Dr. Goldberg's presentation slides there are a few brain SPECT scan images and they also look very similar too. Does this mean that all these people have the same temporal lobe hypoperfusion? Is this coincidence? Do almost all neurodegenerative diseases have the same characteristics? > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.ei-resource.org/myblog/SPECT-Scan-of-Multiple-Chemical-Sensitivity-MC\ S-Patient-Brain.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > JR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 JR, Did you see improvements in your son's spect scans from the initial one? We have not done any at this point but this research is interesting. I'm just wondering what our brains look like? With all the environmental assaults on us daily, especially with cell phones, what does a " normal " brain look like these days. The problem is that people who feel " normal " don't get these sort of scans. I'm very sensitive to chemicals these days but I would not pay for a spect scan...I'm trying to get my kids healthy and pay for the expenses that go along with doing so. My point is, it's seems hard to tell what is unique to our kids and what is happening to all of us that we just don't happen to know about? I remember at the conference that Dr. G said that you can see in spect scans where supplements and HBOT have negatively affected the brain. I'm wondering how he can definitely tell that was the cause when they're are so many other factors. Just wondering. Thanks for sharing! dawn ________________________________ From: <jrodrig6605@...> nids Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 10:57:16 AM Subject: SPECT Scan of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) Patient Brain Hi, I just came across this website that a person with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) put together explaining the results of a brain SPECT scan he got done. The brain SPECT scan images posted in this web page are very similar to the ones from my son's first brain SPECT scan. I also noticed that in some of Dr. Goldberg's presentation slides there are a few brain SPECT scan images and they also look very similar too. Does this mean that all these people have the same temporal lobe hypoperfusion? Is this coincidence? Do almost all neurodegenerative diseases have the same characteristics? http://www.ei- resource. org/myblog/ SPECT-Scan- of-Multiple- Chemical- Sensitivity- MCS-Patient- Brain.html Thanks, JR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.