Guest guest Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 and By the way, I treat patients for seizures,and have been funded by CHOC hospital., jr blind and others. My daughter was treated in 1991 for sz and completely recovered. I have been in this field for over 15 years and have never had a child or adult have sz because of HBOT, Rather the reverse, the sz disappear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 I personally have used HBOT on many children since 1991 and There is no free radicals at the atmospheric pressure used for brain injury, as in Autism. We were using this before DAN was even formed and I have personally seen this work wonders for all three of my daughters which had sz gut, autism, non verbal, what was thought to be auto immune disorders, viral overlaps and verified by many SPECT scans in 1991, Now all three of my daughters have full recovery and are living normal life's ages 20, 22, 23 Free radicals in wound care is used to kick the immune system in gear and use the bodies on immune system to fight infection, this is done at a MUCH deeper depth, as 45 feet in a bone infection. For autism, we use 1.5 ata for one hour. For more information Please do not rule this out, wisely look into the science of HBOT www.hbot4u.com Re: Spect scans Not that I want to go back and forth about this here...but my bottom line was that there is NO WAY to predict the long term effects and consequences of HBOT. Or excess free radical damage. who knows. Yes some of our kids have hypo and hyperperfusion but HBOT can aggravate that and what do you do about hyperperfusion due to excess O2 exposure? Can you reverse it? I dont know. And if our kids really have immune dysfunction is HBOT going to take care of the ROOT issue? What about viral reactivation (I dont know too much about this, just heard of it..) I am just urging caution, that is all. Just because the DAN people do it, it doesnt make it right. They are learning too. - > > > > > > > > and By the way, I treat patients for seizures,and have been funded by > > > CHOC hospital., jr blind and others. My daughter was treated in 1991 for > sz > > > and completely recovered. I have been in this field for over 15 years > and > > > have never had a child or adult have sz because of HBOT, Rather the > reverse, > > > the sz disappear. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2009 Report Share Posted September 19, 2009 again, HBOT normalizes the blood flood, as far as virus or auto immune disorders READ the Peer reviewed studies! www.hbot4u.com, No one is beyond learning, If this type of therapy will help your child, read about learn about.. 7 Re: Spect scans Not that I want to go back and forth about this here...but my bottom line was that there is NO WAY to predict the long term effects and consequences of HBOT. Or excess free radical damage. who knows. Yes some of our kids have hypo and hyperperfusion but HBOT can aggravate that and what do you do about hyperperfusion due to excess O2 exposure? Can you reverse it? I dont know. And if our kids really have immune dysfunction is HBOT going to take care of the ROOT issue? What about viral reactivation (I dont know too much about this, just heard of it..) I am just urging caution, that is all. Just because the DAN people do it, it doesnt make it right. They are learning too. - > > > > > > > > and By the way, I treat patients for seizures,and have been funded by > > > CHOC hospital., jr blind and others. My daughter was treated in 1991 for > sz > > > and completely recovered. I have been in this field for over 15 years > and > > > have never had a child or adult have sz because of HBOT, Rather the > reverse, > > > the sz disappear. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 ''I am just urging caution, that is all. Just because the DAN people do it, it doesn't make it right. They are learning too''. I absolutely agree with this statement but my point is that it could also be fairly and equally applied to and any other experimental treatment that we access for our children. How often do we hear concern from parents on this forum of an adverse reaction in their child from a particular medication before stability is regained by stopping it and yet for other parents that same medication has proven helpful! Parents are faced with a plethora of views when they first start on the trail of treatment for their children and I share your concern that there may be a danger they pursue an unsuitable treatment option simply because it is in vogue with the current in vogue treatment facilities. I was recently involved in a discussion with a number of other parents of young children where we were sharing some thoughts on our journey so far, these parents initiated treatment in the USA prior to living in London and almost all of them see the problem as essentially being in the psychiatric domain because they have gone through mainstream referral (Dr G is quite clear in his view that this is not a psychiatric condition and I happen to agree with him but clearly the parents to whom I refer would not!) so their concern was to be seen by the in vogue psychiatrist used by other parents here in London. The irony was not lost on me that I have never taken my boys to see said psychiatrist and in fact had travelled to see Dr G in the States because I happen to believe that his view mostly best matches mine as to what happened with my boys. In the absence of a universally accepted cause/causes of the problem along with agreed tailored treatment protocols based on validated scientific evidence parents will continue to make best choice decisions based very loosely on who they are placing their trust in at any given time and they will have to hope that they are trusting the right person! In a message dated 19/09/2009 22:38:25 GMT Daylight Time, jrodrig6605@... writes: Would the HBOT take care of the hypoperfusion caused by the viral infections which most of the children with " A " have? I haven't read it would.... JR From: _@..._ (mailto: ) [mailto:_@..._ (mailto: ) ] On Behalf Of Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 2:40 PM _@..._ (mailto: ) Subject: Re: Spect scans Not that I want to go back and forth about this here...but my bottom line was that there is NO WAY to predict the long term effects and consequences of HBOT. Or excess free radical damage. who knows. Yes some of our kids have hypo and hyperperfusion but HBOT can aggravate that and what do you do about hyperperfusion due to excess O2 exposure? Can you reverse it? I dont know. And if our kids really have immune dysfunction is HBOT going to take care of the ROOT issue? What about viral reactivation (I dont know too much about this, just heard of it..) I am just urging caution, that is all. Just because the DAN people do it, it doesnt make it right. They are learning too. - > > > > > > > > and By the way, I treat patients for seizures,and have been funded by > > > CHOC hospital., jr blind and others. My daughter was treated in 1991 for > sz > > > and completely recovered. I have been in this field for over 15 years > and > > > have never had a child or adult have sz because of HBOT, Rather the > reverse, > > > the sz disappear. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2009 Report Share Posted September 24, 2009 > > > > > > > > > > > > and By the way, I treat patients for seizures,and have been funded by > > > > > CHOC hospital., jr blind and others. My daughter was treated in 1991 for > > sz > > > > > and completely recovered. I have been in this field for over 15 years > > and > > > > > have never had a child or adult have sz because of HBOT, Rather the > > reverse, > > > > > the sz disappear. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 resend Sincerely Noel From: NOEL SCHNEIDER <schneid99@...> Subject: Spect scans nids Date: Friday, February 26, 2010, 7:10 PM Hi, I am interested in spect scan for my son who may be possibly ADD. Has anyone had experiences with Dr. Uszler they could share. He is possibly borderline, I am hoping spect will shed some light. Anyway I would appreciate any feedback. Is the scan better than QEEG? How dangerous is the radiation from the scan? I am guessing it is minimal but still concerned. Sincerely Noel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 hi Noel i had a spect scan done on myself, was very interested as you have a baseline one done, then one done when doing a computer program.it showed in me that i had mild restticted blood flow issues to the left and frontal lobe, which corresponded with a eeg on brain which showed i had abnormal brainwaves to front and left lobe. nids From: schneid99@... Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:09:48 -0800 Subject: Fw: Spect scans resend Sincerely Noel From: NOEL SCHNEIDER <schneid99@...> Subject: Spect scans nids Date: Friday, February 26, 2010, 7:10 PM Hi, I am interested in spect scan for my son who may be possibly ADD. Has anyone had experiences with Dr. Uszler they could share. He is possibly borderline, I am hoping spect will shed some light. Anyway I would appreciate any feedback. Is the scan better than QEEG? How dangerous is the radiation from the scan? I am guessing it is minimal but still concerned. Sincerely Noel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2010 Report Share Posted February 28, 2010 i read about spect scans in a book called magnificent minds. i wanna get that done for myself for add/adhd. > > > Hi, > > I am interested in spect scan for my son who may be possibly ADD. Has anyone had experiences with Dr. Uszler they could share. He is possibly borderline, I am hoping spect will shed some light. Anyway I would appreciate any feedback. Is the scan better than QEEG? > > How dangerous is the radiation from the scan? I am guessing it is minimal but still concerned. > > Sincerely Noel > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2010 Report Share Posted March 6, 2010 My son had the spect about a year ago. It's interesting info, but basically just confirms diagnosis evident in blood work. Not completely necessary. It was expensive. I also wonder about the radiation question. The worst part was when he came out of the sedation. Also, he had something like a sunburn on his forehead for a couple months afterward. On Mar 6, 2010 12:04 PM, Laureen Forman & lt;lforman@... & gt; wrote: & nbsp; We had one done with Dr. Uszler 4 months before seeing Dr. G and I found it very helpful. The procedure was not too bad and the information that we got from it helped me. But, he will not diagnose anything  he will say your child has a PTSD/OCD type scan which is what my sons showed  makes me feel bad for the poor guy! I try to keep him as low stress as possible. I¹m hoping to get another one done this year as well to see if there have been any significant changes. Laureen On 2/28/10 5:25 PM, " Ladytiger24fem " & lt;brownsuga_n_az@... & gt; wrote: & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; i read about spect scans in a book called magnificent minds. i wanna get that & gt; done for myself for add/adhd. & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; Hi, & gt; & gt; & gt; & nbsp; & gt; & gt; & gt; I am interested in spect scan for my son who may be possibly ADD. Has & gt; & gt; anyone had experiences with Dr. Uszler they could share. & nbsp; He is possibly & gt; & gt; borderline, I am hoping spect will shed some light. & nbsp; Anyway I would & gt; & gt; appreciate any feedback. & nbsp; Is the scan better than QEEG? & gt; & gt; & gt; & nbsp; & gt; & gt; & gt; How dangerous is the radiation from the scan? & nbsp; I am guessing it is minimal & gt; & gt; but still concerned. & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & nbsp;Sincerely Noel & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; & gt; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.