Guest guest Posted April 17, 2012 Report Share Posted April 17, 2012 Hi Everyone, I would like to encourage everyone to light up Dr, Phil's message boards on his show and tell him what you think. I am hoping that next time he will spend an entire hour or possibly two shows on this disease and find more patients. Below is the comments that I sent to Dr. Phil. Dear Dr. Phil, I was rather disappointed that your guests did not discuss the reason the Western Blot test which is the standard test for Lyme is so inaccurate. The Western Blot test is full of inaccuracies when it comes to determining the presence of chronic Lyme disease because it tests for antibodies to the bacteria. Unfortunately, the most chronically ill patients have such compromised immune function that their bodies no longer make antibodies to fight the disease. Hence they come up negative on the test, causing doctors to erroneously assume that chronic Lyme disease does not exist. It is often the sickest patients that have a negative blood test. A good Lyme literate doctor knows this and bases their diagnoses on a symptom picture as well. Many LLMDs also believe that if any bands come up positive on the Western Blot, that combined with symptoms is enough for a diagnosis. Unfortunately, in order for a Western Blot test to be considered positive for Lyme, multiple bands must come up positive . Common sense tells me that an immune system is not going to make antibodies to a disease that it hasn't been exposed to, so any bands that come up positive should be diagnostic. Unfortunately, the IDSA board has had a history of a revolving door relationship with both insurance companies and drug companies. Senator Blumenthal investigated the conflicts of interest on this board in the past and the board was removed due to these conflicts. When it costs $100,000.00 to treat a Lyme patient with long term antibiotics, is it any wonder that the insurance companies are putting the pressure on the IDSA to limit costs and to not treat the chronically ill at such a high cost. I have spent every spare minute researching this disease and after 3 years of doctor hopping to get diagnosed I found a complimentary medicine doctor who suspected Lyme when she heard what my symptoms were. She used the CD57 to test my immune function which should have been greater then 60 and my score was a 3. After treating me for a couple of months, I was able to render a positive Western Blot test. I now consider myself to be highly educated on this disease as I have spent practically every waking hour reading books on it and searching the internet, buying DVDs from renowned doctors such as Dr. Lee Cowden MD and Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt MD. Unfortunately, when it comes to Lyme disease, I know more then the average MD who has bought into the standard of care definition of Lyme disease treatment. I often find myself educating doctors on Lyme. Most chronically ill patients do not get a diagnosis from their doctor until they have been sick for quite some time, many have never had the bulls eye rash. I didn't. They are then tested without any treatment which would allow the immune function to return and thus render a positive test. Because of this, most of these chronically ill patients test negative. I do think a CD 57 test is a better indicator because a low score, is generally brought about by some kind of infection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.