Guest guest Posted December 11, 2009 Report Share Posted December 11, 2009 I saw this " wonderful " discovery back when it was first published and was actually thrilled that they may have found a genetic component to this. It was not until I dug further that typical people also carried this same gene. What worries me is how desperate they are to publish or announce anything that will show a genetic cause and to make it look like there is no environmental danger out there. I have not written Time magazine yet but I will do so. All the best, Jill From: Kristy Nardini <knardini@...> Subject: Genes and (mis-)Link to Autism , AutismIntervention_SanDiego , autisminterventionsocal Date: Friday, December 11, 2009, 1:35 PM Â http://www.ageofaut ism.com/2009/ 12/jb-handley- the-new-lie- 65-of-our- kids-hav e-the-autism- gene.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.