Guest guest Posted March 26, 2002 Report Share Posted March 26, 2002 on Tue, 26 Mar 2002 at 07:52:47, steverichfield wrote : >I figured that >there would be a stampede to the dentists to rip them out, get >chelation treatments, etc. >Has anyone done this? What did you do? Did it help? Steve, Hi again. I had my amalgams out, not because I really thought it would stop my AF, but because I couldn't afford for it to be a residual risk for the AF. I also didn't like the idea of having them in my mouth anyway. Totally basic metallurgy and corrosion tells anyone that mercury can get out, and not to believe a thing the " locked in " brigade says. Afterwards I chelated for 3 months with cilantro, Vit C, Se, and again a year later for 2 months, and am still on 300 mg/day Vit C, + vit E + various other things from time to time, plus Selenium 200 mg/d. Anyhow, though I saw a slight dip in my AF activity in the few months straight afterwards, I haven't seen any long-term improvement in my AF. I may have done if I had done it 2 or 3 years earlier - (pure supposition). However, the key thing with any AF is to get to it early, since if you don't, the fibbing will remodel your heart muscle and make it worse - whether it is ultimately due to mercury, low body temp, thyroid problem, vagal, with underlying heart disease, whatever. I've noticed that the people who have success with complementary approaches to AF are I think the ones who get to it early. I got to mine with my gastric problems fairly early, but it couldn't completely stop it, and I'm now a persistent fibber without dofetilide, and actively searching around for ablation options. Best of health to all, Vicky London, UK, 1954 model http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ " Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood " - Marie Curie --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ ------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2002 Report Share Posted March 26, 2002 > I got to mine with my gastric problems fairly early, but it couldn't > completely stop it, and I'm now a persistent fibber without dofetilide, > and actively searching around for ablation options. Vicky, is the dofetilide keeping you in nsr some of the time? With the not so great success rate of ablations for permanent afib, have you considered the maze? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2002 Report Share Posted March 26, 2002 In a message dated 3/26/2002 10:20:01 PM Pacific Standard Time, AFIBsupport@... writes: > . The really " hard cases " have had their tonsils out as > children under general anesthetic. Interesting...... I am in permanent afib (I think) although I do not think I have a low body temperature. I do feel a little colder now because heart is not pumping as well. I did have my tonsils out under general anesthesia when I was 5 or 6 though......... Bill Utterback South San Francisco, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2002 Report Share Posted March 26, 2002 Thanks everyone for your experiences. It seems that the time constant for mercury coming out of your brain is 20-30 years, so there is no good reason to expect anything soon. Further, most chelation methods actually mobilize mercury from your body and transport it to your brain, making things worse. There has been some people looking into two-step methods, first chelating the mercury from your body with safer methods, then from your brain once your body is flushed out. It seems that the leading edge of this research is in the area of childhood autism. Vicky, as I recall, you had a low daytime body temperature. I have since reset several other people's persistent low daytime body temperatures, and have learned a LOT. It appears that low daytime body temperature is an eventually terminal condition that only gets harder to reset as the years pass, so this is not just an afib issue. Many people also have insulin resistant diabetes, high triglycerides, etc. Indeed, the higher frequency of low body temperature among afibbers could explain much of their increased risk of stroke! It seems that whatever is " hitting the rail " to cause your afib, that low daytime body temperature certainly complicates understanding what is causing your problems. The really " hard cases " have had their tonsils out as children under general anesthetic. Is this your situation? Steve Richfield ================ > on Tue, 26 Mar 2002 at 07:52:47, steverichfield > <AFIBsupport@s...> wrote : > > >I figured that > >there would be a stampede to the dentists to rip them out, get > >chelation treatments, etc. > >Has anyone done this? What did you do? Did it help? > > Steve, > > Hi again. > > I had my amalgams out, not because I really thought it would stop my AF, > but because I couldn't afford for it to be a residual risk for the AF. > I also didn't like the idea of having them in my mouth anyway. Totally > basic metallurgy and corrosion tells anyone that mercury can get out, > and not to believe a thing the " locked in " brigade says. > > Afterwards I chelated for 3 months with cilantro, Vit C, Se, and again a > year later for 2 months, and am still on 300 mg/day Vit C, + vit E + > various other things from time to time, plus Selenium 200 mg/d. > > Anyhow, though I saw a slight dip in my AF activity in the few months > straight afterwards, I haven't seen any long-term improvement in my AF. > I may have done if I had done it 2 or 3 years earlier - (pure > supposition). > > However, the key thing with any AF is to get to it early, since if you > don't, the fibbing will remodel your heart muscle and make it worse - > whether it is ultimately due to mercury, low body temp, thyroid problem, > vagal, with underlying heart disease, whatever. I've noticed that the > people who have success with complementary approaches to AF are I think > the ones who get to it early. > > I got to mine with my gastric problems fairly early, but it couldn't > completely stop it, and I'm now a persistent fibber without dofetilide, > and actively searching around for ablation options. > > > > Best of health to all, > Vicky > > London, UK, 1954 model > http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ > > " Nothing in life is to be feared. > It is only to be understood " - Marie Curie > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2002 Report Share Posted March 26, 2002 > In a message dated 3/26/2002 10:20:01 PM Pacific Standard Time, > AFIBsupport@s... writes: > > > > . The really " hard cases " have had their tonsils out as > > children under general anesthetic. > > Interesting...... I am in permanent afib (I think) although I do > not think I have a low body temperature. I do feel a little colder > now because heart is not pumping as well. > > I did have my tonsils out under general anesthesia when I was > 5 or 6 though......... > > Bill Utterback > South San Francisco, CA > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2002 Report Share Posted March 27, 2002 on Tue, 26 Mar 2002 at 15:56:15, trudyjhnew wrote : >> I got to mine with my gastric problems fairly early, but it >>couldn't completely stop it, and I'm now a persistent fibber without >>dofetilide, and actively searching around for ablation options. > >Vicky, is the dofetilide keeping you in nsr some of the time? With >the not so great success rate of ablations for permanent afib, have >you considered the maze? Until about 5 days ago, the average was about 50% of the time in AF, with the other 50% in NSR or NSR + significant ectopics, but read this.... The strangest thing has happened (lots of wood knocking going on here - can you hear it?) in the past few days, resulting in less AF !!!.... .....Although my digestive status is improved over what it was (by avoiding wheat), it still isn't right. Now, I *know* we should all drink more water, but I just read a book extract that says when and how it works: specifically that you should drink a half-pint half an hour before a meal, and then again about 2 hours after, plus one before going to bed, plus the remaining recommended 8th glass around your heaviest meal (any extra above 8 is fine). The way it is supposed to work is that the one before the meal gets rapidly absorbed but there is no time to get rid of it before the food hits your stomach and it is called on for work. The absorbed water is called back to the stomach/intestinal lining to be back-flushed into the stomach/intestines and thereby helping in a number of functions - bringing the bicarbonate to the stomach wall that neutralises the acid released, helping with the general aqueous/acid environment that is required, and being present in the body so the last part of the gut doesn't have to preserve its water balance too much. Net result - better digestion, but also, in my case - LESS AF :-)) I am making really strong efforts to make sure I keep drinking enough, and basing on this timing pattern, and I've had about 5 days with much less problem - I even lay on my left in bed this morning (bliss!) without it kicking off an attack. Also, this pattern stops me just peeing all the water out again - I used to drink the 8 glasses between meals, and was always in the loo. So if I'm drinking more and peeing less, it *must* be making a difference to my hydration levels, I think. I'm still waiting to hear on all the options for ablation, btw - have a consultants appt next week to discuss it all. Best of health to all, Vicky London, UK, 1954 model http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ " It is the theory that decides what can be observed " - Albert Einstein --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ ------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2002 Report Share Posted March 27, 2002 on Wed, 27 Mar 2002 at 06:18:19, steverichfield wrote : >Vicky, as I recall, you had a low daytime body temperature. Without looking back at my logs, ISTR that I have a low morning basal metabolic, but generally pretty normal during the day, and it goes a bit lower again near bed time, hence I turned down the importance I gave to this issue, though not forgotten. What I definitely confirmed, though, is that higher body temp = higher heart rate (about 7 bpm per deg F) (and even conventional Docs. agree with this!) and higher heart rate = less AF risk for vagal fibbers. Interestingly, if you check modes of death in hypothermia, it is often arrhythmia. >The really " hard cases " have had their tonsils out as >children under general anesthetic. Is this your situation? But strangely, yes, I had mine out when I was 6. What is the link here, Steve - how does it work? Is it just tonsils or is it the general? Also see my other post about water intake and dehydration correction - I do feel that I have made a difference to my AF by taking in more water - but it must be *effectively* so - not just peed out again. Having water around is an essential prerequisite for all bodily systems to function - and this makes sense to me in control terms that too concentrated a solution means the regulatory systems can't work. Best of health to all, Vicky London, UK, 1954 model http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ " Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification " - Karl Popper --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ ------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2002 Report Share Posted March 28, 2002 Fran: You can purchase Biotest T2 from a number of health food outlets. It is sold as a non-prescription diet aid! Their 50 mcg capsules are SO thermogenic that you can typically divide them into 1/8ths, and take one every hour or two until your temperature pops up to 98.6F. After one day of this, espresso and hot showers should work to pop you up to 98.6F without needing more medicine. Some people, but not many, may require more than one day of T2 to be able to get their temperatures up with espresso and hot showers. You should dress a little UNcomfortably warm both during this treatment and for weeks/months following until you can get by without " crashing " for an afternoon nap when you don't dress so warmly. There is MUCH more clinical experience using prescription T3, though it probably isn't as good. T3 is most easily obtained from an off-shore pharmacy (you lie about your non-existent prescription). It is best to get 5 mcg Cytomel pills. To get a prescription from your doctor: 1. Have him perform a TSH test, which will probably show you to be borderline hypothyroid. 2. Ask for a prescription for a month's supply of 25 mcg Levoxyl and 5 mcg Cytomel pills for a clinical trial. 3. Ask your pharmacy for only few of the Levoxyl pills, but get the full month's supply of the T3. 4. Use a few T3 pills to force your temperature up for a day (it will probably take around 3 if you dress warmly), and use 1/2 of one of the Levoxyl pills when you " crash " (feel cold and sleepy) several hours later, which will fix this in about 45 minutes. Use the remainder of your pills to fix your friends up - you should have enough pills to fix about 6 people, or the 1/4 of your 24 freinds who also have low daytime body temperature. Of course this also works with the Biotest T2, only you get a LOT more in a bottle. It's amazing how turning a friend's health around improves a friendship. I hope this helps you. Steve =============================== > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I have a persistant low body temperature. I have never had my > > tonsils > > > out. How do you reset someones body temperature? You said you had > > > reset many. I have scalding hot baths (my husband wonders how on > > > earth I can sit in them). I sit in front of a roaring fire > > constantly > > > and am ok so long as I have fresh air to breathe. Its only when > it > > > gets stuffy I suffer. But it does not put my temp up. My third > child > > > was 8lbs and was put in an incubator as he was born with low body > > > temperature. Did this come from me? > > > > > > I had measles as a child and nearly died. I actually had an out > of > > > body experience with it. I know that measles can damage the > > autonomic > > > nervous system. But it took years for this to happen. It all > started > > > after the birth of my first child at age 22 (at the time I blamed > > the > > > epidural). I'm now 42. I was what you would call extremely > healthy > > > growing up (apart from measles). I never caught colds etc. My > first > > > general anesthetic was at age 31. I would still call myself > healthy > > > considering. The one thing that I have noticed is that I never > > suffer > > > from cold extremities, even on the sotalol, when I was told this > > > would be a side effect. I just suffer from what seems to be an > > > internal chill. It never goes, no matter how warm the room is. > But I > > > feel great outside on a cold day being active. This is the only > time > > > I feel warm throughout. > > > > > > FRan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2002 Report Share Posted March 29, 2002 > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I have a persistant low body temperature. I have never had my > > > tonsils > > > > out. How do you reset someones body temperature? You said you > had > > > > reset many. I have scalding hot baths (my husband wonders how on > > > > earth I can sit in them). I sit in front of a roaring fire > > > constantly > > > > and am ok so long as I have fresh air to breathe. Its only when > > it > > > > gets stuffy I suffer. But it does not put my temp up. My third > > child > > > > was 8lbs and was put in an incubator as he was born with low > body > > > > temperature. Did this come from me? > > > > > > > > I had measles as a child and nearly died. I actually had an out > > of > > > > body experience with it. I know that measles can damage the > > > autonomic > > > > nervous system. But it took years for this to happen. It all > > started > > > > after the birth of my first child at age 22 (at the time I > blamed > > > the > > > > epidural). I'm now 42. I was what you would call extremely > > healthy > > > > growing up (apart from measles). I never caught colds etc. My > > first > > > > general anesthetic was at age 31. I would still call myself > > healthy > > > > considering. The one thing that I have noticed is that I never > > > suffer > > > > from cold extremities, even on the sotalol, when I was told this > > > > would be a side effect. I just suffer from what seems to be an > > > > internal chill. It never goes, no matter how warm the room is. > > But I > > > > feel great outside on a cold day being active. This is the only > > time > > > > I feel warm throughout. > > > > > > > > FRan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2002 Report Share Posted March 29, 2002 Guys re thyroid and AF. I just want to get my 2c in . I am in the UK and you can get T4 that is Thyroxin several different brands 's seem to be the most common followed by Eltroxin. There is lots of things on the net regarding this med. Also you can get T3 but only one brand is available here.Thryods meds are strickly controlled and only available on prescriptions. I have had Af and now drug free due to PVA. I also lost my Thyroid due to Amiodarone. Over the last year I have been experiencing what can only be described and Hypothyrotoxic. The symptoms for me are feeling depressed, Muscle cramps, feeling cold, weight gain .Chronic constipation and generally feeling slow. All my blood tests were fine and I found out that this was due to the synthetic thyroid replacement. All the normal Drs informed me this could not happen and it was in my mind. One type of thyroxin made my asthma bad. one gave me cramps, one made me very short of breath. On Thursday I was put on Armour thyroid, this is the natural replacement made from Pigs Thyroids. It is only made in the USA so I am a little concerned about the supply. Thats not why I am posting. Although the Thyriod can cause AF it the Hyperactive Thyroids that can cause this. I have been both under active and today over active as I have to get my dose right. Today my heart has been thumping and I feel very stressed , all signs of an over active thyriod, or in my case too much thyroxin. AF is caused by an Electrical problems in the heart or the PV. I have seen in my Ablation the Ep be able to turn up and off AF this was amazing to me.. D will disagree I am sure. I do feel that anything about Temperature an AF may be a little misguided but there again if this make you happy and feel good then why not try it. I am sure this will generate a lot of mails, so I am off on Holiday until April 10th >>Best regards john C --Are T3 and T4 not thyroid meds? If so then I would never be able to come by them. Also I think it is T4 that they won't prescribe here. I have had my thyroid tested for both overactive and underactive over the years to no avail. I live in the UK, so my GP would have to ok it. And he wouldn't. Still can't see how I an force my temperature up. I have a hot bath everymorning and fresh coffee. I put the coal fire on everymorning and ............? I'll do a search on 's syndrome. My baby is 9 years old now, going on 10. He does display stomach problems, dizziness and feeling faint. MMMMMMmmmmmm Fran > Fran: > > There are lots of ways you might have come by your low temp. The trick > is to FORCE it up to 98.6F for a day to let your brain see what it is > like. The drugs of choice are T3 and T2. You should join Yahoo's > WS-Forum, which is concerned with these methods. After that day, warm > clothing, hot morning showers, and some espresso when you first get up > help you jump up to 98.6F after you stop taking the drugs. > > You might look around for a doctor who specializes in " 's > Syndrome therapy " . Alternatively, order everything they have from > <www.wilsonssyndrome.org> and become an expert yourself. > > However, you probably don't have genuine 's Syndrome, but rather > have Chronic Central Hypothermia, a misprogramming of your metabolic > control system. The treatments for these two conditions are very > similar, except that CCH treatment is best done in just one day, > whereas WS threatment is usually stretched out for a week or two. > > Your baby may also require some help in this regard ASAP to avoid a > LOT of problems later in life. > > Steve > =========== > --- ********************************************************************** This message may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. ********************************************************************** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2002 Report Share Posted March 29, 2002 One more thing I had all my Amalgams out as well that did not make any differenc either. It did make my teeth look a whole lot better and that was the reason for the treatments. C -- ********************************************************************** This message may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. ********************************************************************** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2002 Report Share Posted March 31, 2002 > > > > Fran: > > > > > > > > There are lots of ways you might have come by your low temp. The > > > trick > > > > is to FORCE it up to 98.6F for a day to let your brain see what > > it > > > is > > > > like. The drugs of choice are T3 and T2. You should join Yahoo's > > > > WS-Forum, which is concerned with these methods. After that day, > > > warm > > > > clothing, hot morning showers, and some espresso when you first > > get > > > up > > > > help you jump up to 98.6F after you stop taking the drugs. > > > > > > > > You might look around for a doctor who specializes in " 's > > > > Syndrome therapy " . Alternatively, order everything they have > from > > > > <www.wilsonssyndrome.org> and become an expert yourself. > > > > > > > > However, you probably don't have genuine 's Syndrome, but > > > rather > > > > have Chronic Central Hypothermia, a misprogramming of your > > > metabolic > > > > control system. The treatments for these two conditions are very > > > > similar, except that CCH treatment is best done in just one day, > > > > whereas WS threatment is usually stretched out for a week or > two. > > > > > > > > Your baby may also require some help in this regard ASAP to > avoid > > a > > > > LOT of problems later in life. > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > =========== > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > > > This message may contain information which is confidential or > > privileged. > > > If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender > > immediately > > > by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments > > > without retaining a copy. > > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2002 Report Share Posted March 31, 2002 Fran: How about some actual temperatures for us to consider? The most important are afternoon and basal (when you first wake up). Leave the thermometer in a LONG time so we don't need to worry much about accuracy. Steve ============== > > LAF (IMHO) starts as a low-level systemic problem of some > description or > > another (as yet not totally defined for all cases by *anyone*). > > There > > seem to be all sorts of possibilities that could be included in > this > > list - among them mercury amalgams, food intolerances, vagal > > stimulation, thyroid- and adrenal-related issues > (whether " pathological " > > or " hidden " ), low-body temperature due to thyroid etc, (and don't > forget > > there is one very simple low body temp mechanism - low temp causes > low > > heart rate which can trigger AF), also all sorts of other things > which > > are included in the usual remit of major problems recognised by > > conventional medicine - heart valve problems, enlarged heart, etc > etc. > > I agree with this 100%. > > > > > > What I have observed is that people who get active and research > what > > works for *them* in the early stages of LAF seem to have a good > success > > rate - and all power to them - Steve and Victor Thorunyi are > amongst > > those I know of offhand. I also counted myself amongst them at one > > point - so much so I *nearly* asked them to exclude my AF from my > very > > expensive income-if-sick insurance - now so glad I didn't !!> > > HOWEVER - and it's a big however - or rather two howevers. > > > > 1. If you do not *stop* your AF and all its underlying cause(s) > then > > because AF causes remodelling, the ultimate cause of developed AF > can be > > the early AF itself. This is why people who get to a > personal " cure " > > early and get results are the lucky ones and hopefully they can > stay > > AF-free. For those who don't, then AFAIK, undoing of remodelling > is > > still not understood - i.e. whether it really can happen or not - > and > > therefore they are likely to be stuck with it. > > > I wish I had actively looked into AF early on. I did it rather late. > (I have had it for around twenty years now). When I discovered my > intolerance for additives I made a remarkable difference to my AF. It > is always slow now (the antibiotic course I am on at the moment has > actually speeded it up by about 10 beats per minutes to around 75 and > dropped my BP at the bottom end (?distolic) by another ten, so I am > reading 90/45-50 again). But this is ok to get better from infection. > > Anyway I digress, what I am saying is that if I had the way to slow > my AF rate down, then surely I have the power to remodel my sinus > ryhthym. Surely this remodeling, if this is really what it is, works > the other way too. Light excercise will put me in sinus, heavy will > make ectopics etc. Its only at rest I am constantly irregular. So > that cannot be chronic AF. > > My hope is that my low temp is causing the irregularity. When I > excercise my temperature goes up - hence sinus (?). Or maybe it is > because the the stronger pumping action goes through the strongest > channel I have had since birth (?). Maybe it is none of the above. > Either way, there must be a way. > > I still live in hope that I will conquer it. > > > Fran > > > > > " You can convert some of the people some of the time, > > but you can't convert all of the people all of the time " > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2002 Report Share Posted March 31, 2002 on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 at 22:04:21, fross2001 wrote : >Surely this remodeling, if this is really what it is, works >the other way too. I don't think anyone knows - ISTR seeing a discussion recently where they were discussing whether this could happen. A NASPE paper (ref'd on my site) thinks Vit C might slow it down. I tend to think it might not happen - a bit like scar tissue never heals, though I'd love to be proven wrong. -- Best of health to all, Vicky London, UK, 1954 model http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ " Recapture Hearing Your True Heart Melody " - R. ----------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 <<: With good mercury thermometers, you can consistently get readings that agree within 0.2F of each other (usually within 0.05F, even with thermometers from different manufacturers), and which are consistent with your physical condition. By simply leaving them in long enough, they WILL eventually accurately settle on your internal temperature, though this can take 15 minutes to happen. When I started this, I always used at least two thermometers from different manufacturers, but quickly discovered that where was less than 0.2F between the most extreme high and low of the several new and old thermometers in my collection.>> I did the experiment last year with 3 mercury thermometers, I also had to keep them in my mouth for 10-15 minutes.(If you can get hold of an old style thermometer it will get there slightly quicker - I assume because it has thinner glass in it) It turned out I thought my early morning temperatures were low but I discounted this when I switched to an ear thermometer. My theory is that if you happen to be somebody who breaths through their mouths when they are asleep then no wonder the mouth temperature will be lower (a point I've never read on any of the low basal temperature sites that recommend taking mouth temperatures first thing). Not only is the mouth temperature below core temperature but it's not a constant distance away from core temperature. To get the closest result you would probably have to keep you mouth shut for a few hours then take a reading for 15 minutes or so - not very practical and I still think it would be lower than core temp. <<In any case, bodies that are stuck at low night time temperature are usually a full degree (F) lower than those operating at daytime temperatures, so ultimate accuracy is absolutely no issue at all. Anyone who can't differeentiate between two readings that are a degree apart has much bigger (mental) problems than their AF! OK, so prove me wrong. What IS your afternoon temperature?>> I was taking a reading every 3 hours or so when I did the experiment so I've extracted 10 days worth of readings taking the one that fell between 12:00 and 18:00 The average mouth temp comes out at... 98.68 - sot lets call it 98.7 for the same 10 days my temperature under the tongue first thing when I woke up was 97.67 doing the same trick with an ear thermometer. average afternoon temp over 10 days was 99.41 and first thing in the morning was 98.85 I have no objections to people looking at their temperatures but want to stress that it's not as straight forward as they may think. Taking your mouth temperature first thing in a morning, I believe for some, will be a waste of time and the rest of the day it will be lower than core temperature no matter how long you keep the thing in for. These are my personal findings so anyone wishing to drop dead because of what I've said here does so without blaming me Current temp is 98.8 (12:30 pm) all the best -- D (33, Leeds, UK) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 : Hmmm, there were some definite surprises here. Your body (is supposed to) use temperature to tell all systems whether you are awake or asleep - but your morning or " basal " temperature is way too high for this to be working right, so, for example, you probably get up several times each night to use the toilet because your digestion hasn't shut down for the night, you probably need more sleep than most because it isn't as effective, etc. I went through all this with my daughter, who had about the same temps as you do. Just to make absolutely sure these night time temps are accurate, you should probably take your temp in the middle of the night some time. As you are very aware, we don't want to treat an inacurate thermometer. However, considering the much less than one degree difference between basal and afternoon temps, I tend to dismiss this. The quick test is to depress your night time temp with Melatonin and see what happens. The dosage is typically " threshold " in that it doesn't do much until you find your own personal threshold dosage. Further, sublingual pills are preferred due to their more predictable dosing (your liver tries to destroy the melatonin from your digestive tract, so you only get the 10% or so that your liver misses, which can vary quite a bit, depending on what you had for dinner). This is usually a " lifestyle condition " brought on by bright evening lights (wear sunglasses after sunset), sleeping too warmly (wear an insulated vest and not much else at night), not enough exercise, etc., i.e. there isn't anything organically wrong with you, though some incompetent doctor might diagnose you as being " hypERthyroid " and want to damage your slightly better-than-normal thyroid in some way, e.g. with radioactive iodine. Yes, this can cause AF, though the mechanism is completely different than mine - more of a complete opposite. Presuming a sedentary lifestyle, you will need very little adrenaline, and hence need very little vagal stimulation to moderate your heart rate. Indeed, you may need SO little that you just can't shut these systems that far down. When you DO finally dump a little adrenaline or inadvertently stimulate your vagal system, it is not under closed loop regulation. These discontinuous actions end up sending errant signals to your heart, which recognizes them as errant and goes into defensive fibrillation to keep from trying to do the crazy things that the errant signals say to do. We still don't know whether it is your adrenal or your vagal system that is the first to cause problems, but we need to get both of these systems " off of the rail " (which they MUST be on with such a stable temperature) anyway, so it may not be worth the effort to figure out. Also, we don't know whether your are bumping the rail from above or below - whether you are usually in the normal closed-loop region and bump the rail, or are usually in the adrenal/vagal shut down region and sometimes just enter the normal closed-loop region. I'll guess that you are usually in the shut down region. Why? Because you are pretty bright, so if you noticed that this or that made you feel better, then you would be doing this or that. However, being in the shut down region, the queues are REVERSED - the things that you need to do to put you into normal operation make you feel WORSE before they make you feel better, because you must " pass the rail " or go through the operating region that precipitates AF. So what do you do to get out of this mess? Probably the first thing to do is to get a lab test that tells you that something isn't right at some point up the cause and effect chain, just so you can really believe that Steve (I) am right. I believe that if you will test positive for a " melatonin imbalance " if you can find a doctor who is at least tuned in enough to know about these tests. The " Great Smokies " lab has a mail-order test for this. However, I suspect that treating this as a melatonin imbalance won't actually fix your AF. I suspect that you may have to make some significant lifestyle changes to increase the demands on your thyroid, so your adrenal systems needs to pick up the slack, so your vagal system is needed for regulation, so that everything stays " off of the rail " and in the linear operating region. Of course, the REALLY hard part is to first convince yourself to do things that will make you briefly feel worse, then keep doing them in the sure knowledge that you will again get worse if you stop. Obviously, you must REALLY convince yourself that this is the thing to do before proceeding. In a way I envy your condition. I have a bunch of half-burnt glands so that I can never become an athlete, whereas your glands sound like they are in REALLY great shape - just too great for your lifestyle. I hopes this helps. Steve ================= > <<: > > With good mercury thermometers, you can consistently get readings that > agree within 0.2F of each other (usually within 0.05F, even with > thermometers from different manufacturers), and which are consistent > with your physical condition. By simply leaving them in long enough, > they WILL eventually accurately settle on your internal temperature, > though this can take 15 minutes to happen. When I started this, I > always used at least two thermometers from different manufacturers, > but quickly discovered that where was less than 0.2F between the most > extreme high and low of the several new and old thermometers in my > collection.>> > > I did the experiment last year with 3 mercury thermometers, I also had to keep > them in my mouth for 10-15 minutes.(If you can get hold of an old style > thermometer it will get there slightly quicker - I assume because it has > thinner glass in it) > > It turned out I thought my early morning temperatures were low but I > discounted this when I switched to an ear thermometer. My theory is that > if you happen to be somebody who breaths through their mouths when they are > asleep then no wonder the mouth temperature will be lower (a point I've never > read on any of the low basal temperature sites that recommend taking mouth > temperatures first thing). Not only is the mouth temperature below core > temperature but it's not a constant distance away from core temperature. To > get the closest result you would probably have to keep you mouth shut for a > few hours then take a reading for 15 minutes or so - not very practical and I > still think it would be lower than core temp. > > > > <<In any case, bodies that are stuck at low night time temperature are > usually a full degree (F) lower than those operating at daytime > temperatures, so ultimate accuracy is absolutely no issue at all. > Anyone who can't differeentiate between two readings that are a degree > apart has much bigger (mental) problems than their AF! > > OK, so prove me wrong. What IS your afternoon temperature?>> > > I was taking a reading every 3 hours or so when I did the experiment so I've > extracted 10 days worth of readings taking the one that fell between > 12:00 and 18:00 > > The average mouth temp comes out at... > 98.68 - sot lets call it 98.7 > > for the same 10 days my temperature under the tongue first thing when I woke > up was > 97.67 > > > doing the same trick with an ear thermometer. > average afternoon temp over 10 days was > 99.41 > > > and first thing in the morning was > 98.85 > > > I have no objections to people looking at their temperatures but want to > stress that it's not as straight forward as they may think. Taking your mouth > temperature first thing in a morning, I believe for some, will be a waste of > time and the rest of the day it will be lower than core temperature no matter > how long you keep the thing in for. > > These are my personal findings so anyone wishing to drop dead because of what > I've said here does so without blaming me > > > Current temp is 98.8 (12:30 pm) > > all the best > > -- > D (33, Leeds, UK) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 Vicky: The big question in my mind is whether " remodeling " is an emergent property, i.e. which way does cause and effect work?! Perhaps you remember my 80-16-3-1 rule, where 80% of your problems are from one source, and 80% of the remainder are from another, etc., etc. I suspect that even some of the various " successful " treatments (like mine) are hitting the 16% factor, leaving the really BIG problems unaddressed. So just what IS the BIG problem? I don't know, though mercury is high on my suspect list. If this WERE the situation, than people with a worse underlying problem, who got that way by being sick longer, will be seen to be harder to help. To an external observer, it would look like remodeling were alive and well, when in fact the major factor had simply continued to get worse. OK, so you rip your amalgams out and it makes no difference. The mercury in your brain has already done most of its damage by causing your brain to develop differently while you were a child, and the remainder is stuck in there with a half life of 20-30 years, so of course ripping your amalgams out doesn't make much difference. There are some complex chelation approaches to get the mercury out of your brain faster, but I haven't yet found an afibber who has tried them (yet), and I always hate to be the first to try things. Then again, maybe mercury has nothing to do with it, or it has already done its damage, or there is nothing we can do about it, or... Steve ============== > on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 at 22:04:21, fross2001 <fross@e...> wrote : > >Surely this remodeling, if this is really what it is, works > >the other way too. > > I don't think anyone knows - ISTR seeing a discussion recently where > they were discussing whether this could happen. A NASPE paper (ref'd on > my site) thinks Vit C might slow it down. I tend to think it might not > happen - a bit like scar tissue never heals, though I'd love to be > proven wrong. > > -- > Best of health to all, > Vicky > > London, UK, 1954 model > http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ > > " Recapture Hearing Your True Heart Melody " - R. > ----------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 Hi Steve, thanks for the reply. The point I was trying to make has somewhat being strengthened by your reply. I assume you think my basal temperature is high because I gave the ear temperature (98.85), if you only saw my under the tongue temp (97.67) would you have said I was low normal? (As I understand it the healthy range is between 97.7 and 98.2 for basal temps) I'm assuming here that by far the commonest way that people measure their temperature is a mercury thermometer under the tongue rather than tympanic temperature. Given the discrepancy between the two temperatures and the lack of information out there on how to accurately record true temperatures I struggle to see how you, or anyone, can come to any conclusion. As an aside, if I had any confidence in the temperature readings, which I don't, I would repeat the experiment again before trying to conclude anything. I was taking thyroxin at the time which is the simplest explanation for my high temperatures. Now that my thyroid gland has allegedly recovered and I'm no longer on thyroxin it would be interesting to see if the results were similar. The other problem is that I am now overweight and don't get enough exercise which could both be contributing to high temps but is certainly a post AF problem. (that still needs sorting) All the best -- D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 or... the mercury from dental amalgam and other sources is not the problem at all! Mike B Toronto Re: Amalgam removal, etc. Vicky: The big question in my mind is whether " remodeling " is an emergent property, i.e. which way does cause and effect work?! Perhaps you remember my 80-16-3-1 rule, where 80% of your problems are from one source, and 80% of the remainder are from another, etc., etc. I suspect that even some of the various " successful " treatments (like mine) are hitting the 16% factor, leaving the really BIG problems unaddressed. So just what IS the BIG problem? I don't know, though mercury is high on my suspect list. If this WERE the situation, than people with a worse underlying problem, who got that way by being sick longer, will be seen to be harder to help. To an external observer, it would look like remodeling were alive and well, when in fact the major factor had simply continued to get worse. OK, so you rip your amalgams out and it makes no difference. The mercury in your brain has already done most of its damage by causing your brain to develop differently while you were a child, and the remainder is stuck in there with a half life of 20-30 years, so of course ripping your amalgams out doesn't make much difference. There are some complex chelation approaches to get the mercury out of your brain faster, but I haven't yet found an afibber who has tried them (yet), and I always hate to be the first to try things. Then again, maybe mercury has nothing to do with it, or it has already done its damage, or there is nothing we can do about it, or... Steve ============== > on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 at 22:04:21, fross2001 <fross@e...> wrote : > >Surely this remodeling, if this is really what it is, works > >the other way too. > > I don't think anyone knows - ISTR seeing a discussion recently where > they were discussing whether this could happen. A NASPE paper (ref'd on > my site) thinks Vit C might slow it down. I tend to think it might not > happen - a bit like scar tissue never heals, though I'd love to be > proven wrong. > > -- > Best of health to all, > Vicky > > London, UK, 1954 model > http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ > > " Recapture Hearing Your True Heart Melody " - R. > ----------------------------------------------------------- Web Page - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport FAQ - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport/files/Administrative/faq.htm For more information: http://www.dialsolutions.com/af Unsubscribe: AFIBsupport-unsubscribe List owner: AFIBsupport-owner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 Mike: I found a web site that posted a number of interesting research articles " Debunking the Mercury Myth " . One of these articles measured the level of mercury vapor in dental patients and calculated the total mercury consumption based on these observations, and concluded that you could at most reach only a fraction of the WHO threshold for mercury exposure. Then I repeated these computations for MY particular situation, which differed from the research in that: 1. The average dental PATIENT is young, yet many of the symptoms of mercury come much later in life. I have been absorbing mercury for several times as long as the average dental patient, and hence will have accumulated several times as much in my brain. 2. I have many massive amalgams - more than ANYONE else that I have found, and several times what was presumed in the study. Also, some of my amalgams have been replaced several times by now. Multiplying these effects together, I presumably have TWICE the WHO threshold for symptoms. Of course, only a brain biopsy can tell for sure, which sure won't happen during MY lifetime. Add to this Hans' observation regarding the effects of amalgams on LAF. Considering that my computations are based on a VERY conservative study that was used to " debunk " mercury, I don't see any way that I could be any better off than my computations suggest. Of course, even presuming that I am 100% right doesn't say that there is necessarily anything that can be done about it. In any case, my decision is being made for me. My amalgams are falling apart and are in great need of replacement, and I sure am not about to replace them with any more amalgams. Within a year they will either be routinely replaced, or will have fallen out on their own. One study showed that you absorb much less mercury if you have a couple of alcoholic drinks before you have your amalgams removed! Now, how do I convince my dentist that I am not an alcoholic?! Steve =============== > > on Sun, 31 Mar 2002 at 22:04:21, fross2001 <fross@e...> wrote : > > >Surely this remodeling, if this is really what it is, works > > >the other way too. > > > > I don't think anyone knows - ISTR seeing a discussion recently where > > they were discussing whether this could happen. A NASPE paper > (ref'd on > > my site) thinks Vit C might slow it down. I tend to think it might > not > > happen - a bit like scar tissue never heals, though I'd love to be > > proven wrong. > > > > -- > > Best of health to all, > > Vicky > > > > London, UK, 1954 model > > http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ > > > > " Recapture Hearing Your True Heart Melody " - R. > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Web Page - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport > FAQ - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport/files/Administrative/faq.htm > For more information: http://www.dialsolutions.com/af > Unsubscribe: AFIBsupport-unsubscribe@y... > List owner: AFIBsupport-owner@y... > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2002 Report Share Posted April 1, 2002 Just thought I would mention that here are some medical texts about that associate the use of beta blockers with the depletion of melatonin and seratonin. The worst thing about depleted melatonin is that it interferes with your circadian rhythym, and makes sleeping a nightmare (that is what happened to my sleep cycle - its back on course now after stopping beta blockers). And obviously seratonin contributes towards depression. Melatonin is only available on prescription in the UK. It is also used for jet lag, ADHS etc. Fran > > <<: > > > > With good mercury thermometers, you can consistently get readings > that > > agree within 0.2F of each other (usually within 0.05F, even with > > thermometers from different manufacturers), and which are consistent > > with your physical condition. By simply leaving them in long enough, > > they WILL eventually accurately settle on your internal temperature, > > though this can take 15 minutes to happen. When I started this, I > > always used at least two thermometers from different manufacturers, > > but quickly discovered that where was less than 0.2F between the > most > > extreme high and low of the several new and old thermometers in my > > collection.>> > > > > I did the experiment last year with 3 mercury thermometers, I also > had to keep > > them in my mouth for 10-15 minutes.(If you can get hold of an old > style > > thermometer it will get there slightly quicker - I assume because it > has > > thinner glass in it) > > > > It turned out I thought my early morning temperatures were low but I > > discounted this when I switched to an ear thermometer. My theory is > that > > if you happen to be somebody who breaths through their mouths when > they are > > asleep then no wonder the mouth temperature will be lower (a point > I've never > > read on any of the low basal temperature sites that recommend taking > mouth > > temperatures first thing). Not only is the mouth temperature below > core > > temperature but it's not a constant distance away from core > temperature. To > > get the closest result you would probably have to keep you mouth > shut for a > > few hours then take a reading for 15 minutes or so - not very > practical and I > > still think it would be lower than core temp. > > > > > > > > <<In any case, bodies that are stuck at low night time temperature > are > > usually a full degree (F) lower than those operating at daytime > > temperatures, so ultimate accuracy is absolutely no issue at all. > > Anyone who can't differeentiate between two readings that are a > degree > > apart has much bigger (mental) problems than their AF! > > > > OK, so prove me wrong. What IS your afternoon temperature?>> > > > > I was taking a reading every 3 hours or so when I did the experiment > so I've > > extracted 10 days worth of readings taking the one that fell between > > 12:00 and 18:00 > > > > The average mouth temp comes out at... > > 98.68 - sot lets call it 98.7 > > > > for the same 10 days my temperature under the tongue first thing > when I woke > > up was > > 97.67 > > > > > > doing the same trick with an ear thermometer. > > average afternoon temp over 10 days was > > 99.41 > > > > > > and first thing in the morning was > > 98.85 > > > > > > I have no objections to people looking at their temperatures but > want to > > stress that it's not as straight forward as they may think. Taking > your mouth > > temperature first thing in a morning, I believe for some, will be a > waste of > > time and the rest of the day it will be lower than core temperature > no matter > > how long you keep the thing in for. > > > > These are my personal findings so anyone wishing to drop dead > because of what > > I've said here does so without blaming me > > > > > > Current temp is 98.8 (12:30 pm) > > > > all the best > > > > -- > > D (33, Leeds, UK) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2002 Report Share Posted April 2, 2002 on Mon, 1 Apr 2002 at 14:00:07, steverichfield wrote : >Vicky: > >The big question in my mind is whether " remodeling " is an emergent >property, i.e. which way does cause and effect work?! I have no doubt whatsoever that remodelling is a derivative property, though whether you mean emergent in the strictly " extra revealed behaviour " sense of complex systems theory I don't know. But either way, the point I was making was that this phenomenon may be irreversible. To make an analogy with your business, think about tracking across the surface of an insulator. And maybe in the same way that scar tissue forms on skin. Best of health to all, Vicky London, UK, 1954 model http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ " Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood " - Marie Curie --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ ------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2002 Report Share Posted April 2, 2002 Vicky: The BIG question in my mind is: Is there ANYONE who, if we put all of their metabolic parameters into their midrange, will still have their AF? I'm not sure what the entire list is, but it certainly includes: 1. Thyroid system (normal daily temperature cycling). 2. Adrenal system (adequately warm dress). 3. Vagal system (e.g. no bloated tummies). 4. Sugar balance (not too much of of a good thing). 5. Fluid balance (adequate intake of warm water). Of course, this is easier said than done, but I believe that anyone can do it. If people's AF can survive having these parameters being set to midrange, then we will have the definitive answer to your remodeling theory. If not, then we will have the definitive answer to my metabolic control theory. Either way, I believe that anyone who sets about centering these parameters will be a LOT better off, both with their AF and with their other health problems. The REAL challenge is situations like , where doing this will predictably make things briefly WORSE before they get better. Remembering my very scary day last June when I first tried my experimental one-day-cure on myself with some people predicting disastrous results (e.g. continuous afib, heart attack), I can just image the trepidation of someone being told to do things that they KNOW from experience will make their AF worse. Of course, this is best done in a clinical setting. I still remember 45 minutes of shivering under an electric blanket in an 80F room. I knew what had to be done and did it, but certainly did NOT have the presence of mind to handle anything unexpected. Unfortunately, I know of NO doctor anywhere who is capable of doing this, though there are various specialists in particular areas, like Dr. Rind <www.drrind.com> is with adrenal issues. I wonder if somewhere out there, someone would like to underwrite a " metabolic normalization " clinic, where you would go to get all of your metabolic parameters normalized, and get trained to keep them that way after you leave? While legally impractical in the US or UK, this could easily be done in Mexico or Costa Rica. There must be someone out there with both money and AF? A shipboard clinic with the appropriate foreign registry might also work, which could travel around, saving patients (most of) the travel costs. Such a clinic should be profitable, so this should be a good investment. After initial normalization and evaluation, some patients would be sent to a specialist to address any remaining problems that are difficult to manage. I believe that this approach will cure or greatly improve the vast majority of AF. To prove my point, this would have cured all of those that I know of who have otherwise found their own personal cures that typically address just the one worst parameter. Steve ================= > on Mon, 1 Apr 2002 at 14:00:07, steverichfield > <AFIBsupport@s...> wrote : > >Vicky: > > > >The big question in my mind is whether " remodeling " is an emergent > >property, i.e. which way does cause and effect work?! > > I have no doubt whatsoever that remodelling is a derivative property, > though whether you mean emergent in the strictly " extra revealed > behaviour " sense of complex systems theory I don't know. But either > way, the point I was making was that this phenomenon may be > irreversible. > > To make an analogy with your business, think about tracking across the > surface of an insulator. And maybe in the same way that scar tissue > forms on skin. > > Best of health to all, > Vicky > > London, UK, 1954 model > http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ > > " Nothing in life is to be feared. > It is only to be understood " - Marie Curie > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2002 Report Share Posted April 2, 2002 Steve wrote: <<The BIG question in my mind is: Is there ANYONE who, if we put all of their metabolic parameters into their midrange, will still have their AF? I'm not sure what the entire list is, but it certainly includes:>> I think the short answer is yes. Is suspect it would contain more people with persistent AF rather than paroxysmal though. If the problem wasn't hard enough to solve anyway I think as soon as the heart gets some fibrous tissue in it or the perpendicular channels stop working with age then convincing the heart to beat normally is an even bigger struggle. The question is can you stop a heart which becomes predisposed to liking AF from going into it? If any remodelling has happened in my heart I still think I'm a good candidate for tweaking the parameters since my heart still knows how to beat normally 94% of the time. I suspect, though I don't like to admit it myself, that many of us have had irreversible physical changes in the heart either through the aging process or some other disease process. Of course, just because our hearts a more susceptible to going into AF doesn't mean we can't do something to stop them going in - but it might not be to set all our parameters to 'normal'. <<The REAL challenge is situations like , where doing this will predictably make things briefly WORSE before they get better.>> I'm not sure I'm now fit enough to survive the AF that I had in the first six months so making my AF worse is a bit of a problem. Finding a balance between how much I'm prepared to experiment and how much I can cope with 24 hours of AF every 16 days is one of the problems. I'm not sure I have the confidence to say things will get worse and then get better - I know things could just as easily get worse then go down hill! -- D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2002 Report Share Posted April 2, 2002 on Tue, 2 Apr 2002 at 16:48:08, steverichfield wrote : >The BIG question in my mind is: >Is there ANYONE who, if we put all of their metabolic parameters into >their midrange, will still have their AF? Steve, No. 1: I think you are basically talking mainly about Lone AF. There are umpteen causes of AF due to various heart diseases etc etc - I have a mild mitral valve prolapse for example, which I am sure isn't helping the AF (back flow of blood and pressure to stretch the heart muscle). I also met a bunch of people in hospital who quite clearly have AF as a side-effect of something else (cardiomyopathy etc etc) No. 2 : I recognise this is a question in your mind, too, and not necessarily an answer! I'd like to think it might be right, but as you say, getting everything mid-range might well be difficult. No 3. : >I believe that this approach will cure or greatly improve the vast >majority of AF. In fact, statistically, the " vast majority " of AF cases seen by the Doctors (and not just representative of an internet support group populated by pro-active individuals like us who are frustrated with what in many cases is a lone AF) are not Lone AF - they have all sorts of other heart & etc conditions. - I think the problem for many lone AF sufferers is just this - that they are NOT representative of the overall statistical case load the Drs get - I certainly am not - most Drs I have ever talked to haven't a clue about vagal AF, for example. Steve - for my interest, since I never knew this - what was the peak level of AF attacks you ever got? (average hours/day, days/month, and elapsed time from your first ever diagnosed attack to when you laid it to rest)? Do you fit with my get-to-it-early theory? Best of health to all, Vicky London, UK, 1954 model http://www.vagalafibportal.fsnet.co.uk/ " Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification " - Karl Popper --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ ------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.