Guest guest Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 Dr. Amy told me females are typically stronger, not in terms of muscle but in terms of resilience, which may be why boys are more often affected. She also said (and I agree) that while the " official " autism ratio is 5:1 she has found it's more like 15:1. I've got one of the unlucky " ones " , I guess. I was reading a while back (maybe it was on this board) that pale skinned girls of Scandinavian descent are much more apt to be sensitive to mercury than the general population. My husband is 1/2 Swedish, and Sonja is pale, so maybe there a link, for what it's worth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 In a message dated 10/17/01 3:17:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, mturner@... writes: << I have been reading about possible causes of autism - vaccines, antibiotics, toxic elements, gluten/casein intolerance but I am confused. Why is it that the ratio of autistic boys to girls is 4:1? Are girls biologically different that their able to fight better? Just trying to pull it all together in my mind. >> : I posted this last week, but to repeat: The ratio is about 4 boys to every 1 girl who is affected. The theories that have arisen for this have to do with hormonal differerences between males and females. Also, generally, females tend to have stronger physiological constitutions, since they are 'designed' for reproduction of offspring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 Likewise, why do more women than men have autoimmune diseases? We are genetically different is my guess. Carmen mturner@... wrote: > I have been reading about possible causes of autism - vaccines, > antibiotics, toxic elements, gluten/casein intolerance but I am > confused. Why is it that the ratio of autistic boys to girls is > 4:1? Are girls biologically different that their able to fight > better? Just trying to pull it all together in my mind. > > > > > ======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 Dear Everyone In reply to:I have been reading about possible causes of autism - vaccines, antibiotics, toxic elements, gluten/casein intolerance but I am confused. Why is it that the ratio of autistic boys to girls is 4:1? Are girls biologically different that their able to fight better? Just trying to pull it all together in my mind. Comment: The ratio of gender (boys/girls) who developed mercury sensitivity/poisoning from the mercurous chloride in the baby's teething powders (pink disease, acrodynia) in the first half of last century was equal. However, the number of male babies who succumbed to the symptoms of the time and consequently died, was greater. More girl babies survived pink disease than boys. I was told once that girl babies are better " fighters " in illness or even prematurity of birth. Can anyone confirm this? Just a comment. Thiele Pink Disease Support Group Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 mturner@... wrote: > I have been reading about possible causes of autism - vaccines, > antibiotics, toxic elements, gluten/casein intolerance but I am > confused. Why is it that the ratio of autistic boys to girls is > 4:1? Are girls biologically different that their able to fight > better? Just trying to pull it all together in my mind. > > > It could be that girls do have a genetic " advantage " in the avoidance of autism expression. <I studied genetics in graduate school while pursuing a degree in plant breeding.> Genetics based on gender could be the reason for the difference. But why then would both sexes get autism? Since both sexes exhibit autism, it seems possible to suggest that several or many genes may be involved in triggering autism unrelated to gender. (I have read in my study of autism of several genes on different chromosomes being identified for possibly being linked to autism). In the case of females to males expression ratio -there may be another gene (or genes) responsible for some form of autism like symptoms which might be found on the 23rd or " Y " chromosome, the one that determines the gender. Females 23rd chromosome is an " XX " and males are a " XY " . Females have no " Y " chromosome - this is the fundamental genetic difference between the genders. If there is another gene or genes that exist on the " Y " chromosome, this might explain why boys express autism with a greater frequency. If boys have potentially more genes (on the " Y " ) in addition to potential other genes on the rest of the chromosomes, then the cards would be stacked against the boys. (The " Y " chromosome is probably responsible for other things like finding the 3 stooges funny, remote control dependency issues and toilet lid closure - but Ill let other speculate that possibility ) Again, I would suspect that several genes on different chromosomes are involved in autism expression since both male and females can express it. Several differing genes being responsible might also explain the varying degrees exhibited individual to individual of autism in addition to environmental factors. Environmental factors or a set of environmental factors might also influence the varying degrees of austim expression. Environmental factors would being things such as heavy metals, weakened immune systems, nutritional issues and/or dysbiosis of intestinal flora. Studies to determine what genes and how or when they are expressed would not be easy. Does that help? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 ---This is the way I have come to understand why more boys have autism than girls... Girls' immune systems are developed earlier than boys and they have a stronger immune system. I think hormones may have something to do with it. So it may be easier for the girls to fight off the effects of the vaccines and other " junk " (including monkey blood) that is injected into our innocent children. I had this question thrown at me many times, as I have boy-girl twins, my son has autism and my daughter does not, although my daughter does have some sensory issues, and some problems retaining what she learns. BUT... at about the same time my son was diagnosed with autism, several people had asked me if my daughter had Downs Syndrome...she had the facial features, and was very clingy, and quiet at that time. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In @y..., Mueller <yardist@k...> wrote: > mturner@c... wrote: > > > I have been reading about possible causes of autism - vaccines, > > antibiotics, toxic elements, gluten/casein intolerance but I am > > confused. Why is it that the ratio of autistic boys to girls is > > 4:1? Are girls biologically different that their able to fight > > better? Just trying to pull it all together in my mind. > > > > > > > > It could be that girls do have a genetic " advantage " in the avoidance of > autism expression. > <I studied genetics in graduate school while pursuing a degree in plant > breeding.> > > Genetics based on gender could be the reason for the difference. But why > then would both sexes get autism? > > Since both sexes exhibit autism, it seems possible to suggest that > several or many genes may be involved in triggering autism unrelated to > gender. (I have read in my study of autism of several genes on different > chromosomes being identified for possibly being linked to autism). In > the case of females to males expression ratio -there may be another gene > (or genes) responsible for some form of autism like symptoms which might > be found on the 23rd or " Y " chromosome, the one that determines the > gender. > > Females 23rd chromosome is an " XX " and males are a " XY " . Females have no > " Y " chromosome - this is the fundamental genetic difference between the > genders. If there is another gene or genes that exist on the " Y " > chromosome, this might explain why boys express autism with a greater > frequency. If boys have potentially more genes (on the " Y " ) in addition > to potential other genes on the rest of the chromosomes, then the cards > would be stacked against the boys. > > (The " Y " chromosome is probably responsible for other things like > finding the 3 stooges funny, remote control dependency issues and toilet > lid closure - but Ill let other speculate that possibility ) > > Again, I would suspect that several genes on different chromosomes are > involved in autism expression since both male and females can express > it. Several differing genes being responsible might also explain the > varying degrees exhibited individual to individual of autism in addition > to environmental factors. Environmental factors or a set of > environmental factors might also influence the varying degrees of austim > expression. > > Environmental factors would being things such as heavy metals, weakened > immune systems, nutritional issues and/or dysbiosis of intestinal > flora. > > Studies to determine what genes and how or when they are expressed would > not be easy. > > Does that help? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 If mercury poisoning does influence/trigger/worsen autism then the explanation that was given to me makes sense. Mercury in low doses affects mainly males. Mercury in high doses affects males and females equally. This would go along with females having stronger immune systems when doses are small they are able to move the toxins out and maintain an intact immune system. When the mercury amounts are high, even our girls are injured. Theresa, Mom to 3yr old , ASD and 4 yr old , NT > > > > > I have been reading about possible causes of autism - vaccines, > > > antibiotics, toxic elements, gluten/casein intolerance but I am > > > confused. Why is it that the ratio of autistic boys to girls is > > > 4:1? Are girls biologically different that their able to fight > > > better? Just trying to pull it all together in my mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > It could be that girls do have a genetic " advantage " in the > avoidance of > > autism expression. > > <I studied genetics in graduate school while pursuing a degree in > plant > > breeding.> > > > > Genetics based on gender could be the reason for the difference. > But why > > then would both sexes get autism? > > > > Since both sexes exhibit autism, it seems possible to suggest that > > several or many genes may be involved in triggering autism > unrelated to > > gender. (I have read in my study of autism of several genes on > different > > chromosomes being identified for possibly being linked to autism). > In > > the case of females to males expression ratio -there may be another > gene > > (or genes) responsible for some form of autism like symptoms which > might > > be found on the 23rd or " Y " chromosome, the one that determines the > > gender. > > > > Females 23rd chromosome is an " XX " and males are a " XY " . Females > have no > > " Y " chromosome - this is the fundamental genetic difference between > the > > genders. If there is another gene or genes that exist on the " Y " > > chromosome, this might explain why boys express autism with a > greater > > frequency. If boys have potentially more genes (on the " Y " ) in > addition > > to potential other genes on the rest of the chromosomes, then the > cards > > would be stacked against the boys. > > > > (The " Y " chromosome is probably responsible for other things like > > finding the 3 stooges funny, remote control dependency issues and > toilet > > lid closure - but Ill let other speculate that possibility ) > > > > Again, I would suspect that several genes on different chromosomes > are > > involved in autism expression since both male and females can > express > > it. Several differing genes being responsible might also explain the > > varying degrees exhibited individual to individual of autism in > addition > > to environmental factors. Environmental factors or a set of > > environmental factors might also influence the varying degrees of > austim > > expression. > > > > Environmental factors would being things such as heavy metals, > weakened > > immune systems, nutritional issues and/or dysbiosis of intestinal > > flora. > > > > Studies to determine what genes and how or when they are expressed > would > > not be easy. > > > > Does that help? > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2001 Report Share Posted October 19, 2001 While I can't explain this, neither can anybody else in any really fundamental way. Nor can they explain most of the other differences between men and women. They also can't explain why you are bilaterally summetric on the outside but not at all so on the inside, or how your body knows which side to put your organs on. There are known biochemical differences in how men and women respond to lead intoxication, so it isn't unexpected there should be a sex difference. There are also some very profound and poorly understood metabolic differences between men and women (to go with the physical differences) but for the most part modern medicine assumes they are the same except for a few hormones. > > > > > I have been reading about possible causes of autism - vaccines, > > > antibiotics, toxic elements, gluten/casein intolerance but I am > > > confused. Why is it that the ratio of autistic boys to girls is > > > 4:1? Are girls biologically different that their able to fight > > > better? Just trying to pull it all together in my mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > It could be that girls do have a genetic " advantage " in the > avoidance of > > autism expression. > > <I studied genetics in graduate school while pursuing a degree in > plant > > breeding.> > > > > Genetics based on gender could be the reason for the difference. > But why > > then would both sexes get autism? > > > > Since both sexes exhibit autism, it seems possible to suggest that > > several or many genes may be involved in triggering autism > unrelated to > > gender. (I have read in my study of autism of several genes on > different > > chromosomes being identified for possibly being linked to autism). > In > > the case of females to males expression ratio -there may be another > gene > > (or genes) responsible for some form of autism like symptoms which > might > > be found on the 23rd or " Y " chromosome, the one that determines the > > gender. > > > > Females 23rd chromosome is an " XX " and males are a " XY " . Females > have no > > " Y " chromosome - this is the fundamental genetic difference between > the > > genders. If there is another gene or genes that exist on the " Y " > > chromosome, this might explain why boys express autism with a > greater > > frequency. If boys have potentially more genes (on the " Y " ) in > addition > > to potential other genes on the rest of the chromosomes, then the > cards > > would be stacked against the boys. > > > > (The " Y " chromosome is probably responsible for other things like > > finding the 3 stooges funny, remote control dependency issues and > toilet > > lid closure - but Ill let other speculate that possibility ) > > > > Again, I would suspect that several genes on different chromosomes > are > > involved in autism expression since both male and females can > express > > it. Several differing genes being responsible might also explain the > > varying degrees exhibited individual to individual of autism in > addition > > to environmental factors. Environmental factors or a set of > > environmental factors might also influence the varying degrees of > austim > > expression. > > > > Environmental factors would being things such as heavy metals, > weakened > > immune systems, nutritional issues and/or dysbiosis of intestinal > > flora. > > > > Studies to determine what genes and how or when they are expressed > would > > not be easy. > > > > Does that help? > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2002 Report Share Posted February 3, 2002 >>chiled has a strong intolerance for wheat over milk ore milk over wheat if you get different problems. Like wheat and phenol problems go together and milk and hyper problems go to gether . That is an interesting observation. I would have put milk and phenol and hyper together, and wheat with diarrhea or something like that. I haven't really noticed anything in particular, but it is worth considering. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2002 Report Share Posted July 11, 2002 I agree that this could be Sensory integration dysfunction. Has he had an OT eval? My daughter has a lot of sensory integration (SI) issues that could be confused for autistic like behaviors. She is also very social and engaging. Brushing has helped a lot, but should ONLY be done under the supervision of a qualified OT. So has a lot of the other SI activities. " the out of sync child " book is a good place to start. Traci mom to Kennedy 2.1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2003 Report Share Posted March 25, 2003 Can you tell me what Pro-efa is? I read a lot about it but am clueless. Are people having success? Thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2003 Report Share Posted May 10, 2003 Hi Athena, I agree, it's not the best time to get information from messages now, but while all this is going on you can read the " Files " section of this group. You will get a lot of good information from there. If you have questions, you can ask them, and I am sure here will be people willing to help. I hope you do not vaccinate your kids any more. I wish you good luck with this group and chelation and progress and recovery for your children. Margaret > I am new to the group. I have 8 children. 5 solidly reside on the spectrum. > 2 have one foot on and one foot off. The youngest is only 7 mos old and > shows no symptoms YET. All my children were carried while I was at various > stages of mercury toxicity. I came to this list to get information regarding > the relationship between mercury and ASD. However I am disappointed to fing > that the majority of this list is little more than a group of bickering > people that appear to have no interest in disseminating any information at > all. I feel for the loss the children are suffering due to the heated > discussions over this person. Now I will not be drawn into > discussions relating to this issue because it all occurred before I joined > this group. I am sure there are strong feelings on both sides. I for one > would hope that inappropriate language would be moderated and corrected. > However as a teacher I would hope that this was done in a way that truly > allowed the individual to understand how to comply with the instructions. > Whether all this occurred is unknown to me. I would hope however that this > list could move on and continue to be helpful to new members that know > nothing of this debate. If the moderators wish to ban me for my comments > then so be it. I plan to give the list a little more time to see if I can > get any useful information. If I cannot then I will be leaving. This debate > is destroying the usefulness of this group. I hope that this can stop. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2003 Report Share Posted May 10, 2003 The list is usually OK. You just hit it at a bad time. Stick around and let's hope some people decide to be more responsible and let us get back to discussing how to help sick kids who need it. > I am new to the group. I have 8 children. 5 solidly reside on the spectrum. > 2 have one foot on and one foot off. The youngest is only 7 mos old and > shows no symptoms YET. All my children were carried while I was at various > stages of mercury toxicity. I came to this list to get information regarding > the relationship between mercury and ASD. However I am disappointed to fing > that the majority of this list is little more than a group of bickering > people that appear to have no interest in disseminating any information at > all. I feel for the loss the children are suffering due to the heated > discussions over this person. Now I will not be drawn into > discussions relating to this issue because it all occurred before I joined > this group. I am sure there are strong feelings on both sides. I for one > would hope that inappropriate language would be moderated and corrected. > However as a teacher I would hope that this was done in a way that truly > allowed the individual to understand how to comply with the instructions. > Whether all this occurred is unknown to me. I would hope however that this > list could move on and continue to be helpful to new members that know > nothing of this debate. If the moderators wish to ban me for my comments > then so be it. Believe me, this is the least of your worries. > I plan to give the list a little more time to see if I can > get any useful information. You might find some useful information in the files section of the listserver's web interface: /group/autism treatment/files >If I cannot then I will be leaving. This debate > is destroying the usefulness of this group. I hope that this can stop. So do I. And I hope you are patient enough to wait it out. Andy . . . .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2003 Report Share Posted May 10, 2003 > However I am disappointed to fing > that the majority of this list is little more than a group of bickering > people that appear to have no interest in disseminating any information at > all. I think that if you would read some messages from the archive, or some of the files in the Files section, you would be surprised to find out that this group is one of the most valuable (regarding autism, of course). Most people here are very helpful, knowledgeable, they are always eager to share any information they have with everybody, it's a really nice group. Well... only if you want to learn. If you don't, then you won't like it much. At times, there are arguments and fights here. But that's just part of the charm of this group Valentina PS. Don't worry, the moderator will not ban you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2003 Report Share Posted May 10, 2003 Hey Athena, Don't leave us now. I've been on this list for about two years or more. These kinds of personality conflicts blow up every once in a while, but then subside. There's lots of good stuff here for the taking. Barb [ ] Confused > I am new to the group. I have 8 children. 5 solidly reside on the spectrum. > 2 have one foot on and one foot off. The youngest is only 7 mos old and > shows no symptoms YET. All my children were carried while I was at various > stages of mercury toxicity. I came to this list to get information regarding > the relationship between mercury and ASD. However I am disappointed to fing > that the majority of this list is little more than a group of bickering > people that appear to have no interest in disseminating any information at > all. I feel for the loss the children are suffering due to the heated > discussions over this person. Now I will not be drawn into > discussions relating to this issue because it all occurred before I joined > this group. I am sure there are strong feelings on both sides. I for one > would hope that inappropriate language would be moderated and corrected. > However as a teacher I would hope that this was done in a way that truly > allowed the individual to understand how to comply with the instructions. > Whether all this occurred is unknown to me. I would hope however that this > list could move on and continue to be helpful to new members that know > nothing of this debate. If the moderators wish to ban me for my comments > then so be it. I plan to give the list a little more time to see if I can > get any useful information. If I cannot then I will be leaving. This debate > is destroying the usefulness of this group. I hope that this can stop. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > > > ======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2005 Report Share Posted April 15, 2005 Hi Jill, I am certainly not a medical professional and not in a position to diagnose, but the sensory issues you described below are flags for autism spectrum disorders. Certainly the sooner you get her into appropriate therapy (the OT should help) the better. Ask the developmental pediatrican if you can get on a waiting list in case of cancellations. I'm not sure what the rules are in your state, but in North Carolina there is an agency that screens young children, and then depending on their report, you can get access to some early intervention services. Ask around to see what early intervention services your area offers -- they will at least steer you in the right direction. I wish you all the best with your daughter. Our three and a half year old son has both apraxia and autism, and it certainly has been a difficult road to travel. We use a combination of PROMPT type speech therapy, verbal behavior analysis and OT with a sensory integration approach for him. He's made great gains, but there is still a long way to go! Best, Pam [ ] confused hi, i jsut wanted to say how great this list is to communicate with others in the same set of circumstances, and i was hoping someone out there could shed some light on my situation. my 21 month old daughter has been in speech therapy for about 2 months now because she is not using words to communicate. she can babble and verbalize ma ma ma ma da da da but doesn't use it like when she is looking for either one of us or when she wants our attention. she also has about 8 other words (some are approximations), but will only repeat them when said to her. in other words, she won't see an apple and say " apple " , she will only repeat it if you say it to her. she also has no way of communicating whether she is hungry or thirsty...instead she breaks down in a tantrum at certain times in the day but will snap out of it instantly if i say, " do you want a drink? " she understands a lot of what i say and follows commands, although she tends to ignore me sometimes and do whatever s! he wants. the ST has told me that she does not think she has dyspraxia. i am starting OT also next week b/c of her sensory integration issues such as feeding aversions, tactile issues, difficulty transitioning, and motor issues such as arm flapping and spinning. but it seems like no one either knows or will tell me why she does what she does. is there a diagnosis for all this? i am starting the process of getting her in to see a developmental pediatrician, but i hear it won't be for 3 months til she gets an appt. if anyone has any insight, i would love to hear it. thanks in advance, jill __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2005 Report Share Posted April 15, 2005 Jill, I'm no doctor but from the sound of it, your daughter may have Apraxia which is a nuerologically based motor-planning disorder. My son was diagnosed in February by a neurodevelopmental pediatrician. Prior to this appointment, which also took 2 months to get; my son was pretty much non-verbal. He didn't even say Mom. He's improved alot and I think it's due to his pre-school which runs a developmentally delay program and our persistance. He now says about 100 words but cannot string any into sentences. There are many words where he'll cut off the beginning -in uck instead of truck, us for bus, ilk for milk. If he's hungry, he will say " eat " or he'll take me to the stove...I would have her seen by a developmental pediatrician and the mean time, stick with the Speech. The treatment for Apraxia is extensive Speech Therapy. My son also had mild hypotonia (low-muscle town in his forearms) for which OT is recommended and some sensory issues; loud noises really bother him like the vacuum and lawn tractor. I hope this helps. Jill <jillybener@...> Sent by: cc: @yaho Subject: [ ] confused ogroups.com 04/15/2005 02:20 PM Please respond to hi, i jsut wanted to say how great this list is to communicate with others in the same set of circumstances, and i was hoping someone out there could shed some light on my situation. my 21 month old daughter has been in speech therapy for about 2 months now because she is not using words to communicate. she can babble and verbalize ma ma ma ma da da da but doesn't use it like when she is looking for either one of us or when she wants our attention. she also has about 8 other words (some are approximations), but will only repeat them when said to her. in other words, she won't see an apple and say " apple " , she will only repeat it if you say it to her. she also has no way of communicating whether she is hungry or thirsty...instead she breaks down in a tantrum at certain times in the day but will snap out of it instantly if i say, " do you want a drink? " she understands a lot of what i say and follows commands, although she tends to ignore me sometimes and do whatever s! he wants. the ST has told me that she does not think she has dyspraxia. i am starting OT also next week b/c of her sensory integration issues such as feeding aversions, tactile issues, difficulty transitioning, and motor issues such as arm flapping and spinning. but it seems like no one either knows or will tell me why she does what she does. is there a diagnosis for all this? i am starting the process of getting her in to see a developmental pediatrician, but i hear it won't be for 3 months til she gets an appt. if anyone has any insight, i would love to hear it. thanks in advance, jill __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2005 Report Share Posted April 19, 2005 You want to lay her on the right side, opposite the flat spot. Most likely her left forehead and facial features look more pronounced because they are pushed slightly forward. Also, the tight neck has an impact on the right side. mom to naDOC GradSouth Carolinawww.thefilyaws.com datb71 <aguinesslover@...> wrote: Hi. I'm confused. If my baby is always laying to the left, I want to position her to the right while she is sleeping? I just read that external forces should be applied to the side that sticks out. So the affected side is the larger or the smaller side. Her right side, ear and eye seem to be smaller, is that the affected side?. I feel like these questions are stupid, sorry.For more plagio info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2005 Report Share Posted April 19, 2005 You want to lay her on the right side, opposite the flat spot. Most likely her left forehead and facial features look more pronounced because they are pushed slightly forward. Also, the tight neck has an impact on the right side. mom to naDOC GradSouth Carolinawww.thefilyaws.com datb71 <aguinesslover@...> wrote: Hi. I'm confused. If my baby is always laying to the left, I want to position her to the right while she is sleeping? I just read that external forces should be applied to the side that sticks out. So the affected side is the larger or the smaller side. Her right side, ear and eye seem to be smaller, is that the affected side?. I feel like these questions are stupid, sorry.For more plagio info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2005 Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 What neuro did you see? Not all doctors are helmet friendly. If your ped says your son needs a band and Cranial Tech agrees, I'd definitely get him one. You don't need a prescription from a specialist, just ask your ped to write it. Many neurosurgeons are just looking at brain function and if they don't see that as a concern they won't recommend banding. Many children don't have facial asymmetry (especially with the brachy shape), but they can still have very severe flatness that you would want corrected. So, I definitely think you should just call your ped and ask them to write the presciption for you. Cranial Tech would not suggest a band to you if he wouldn't benefit from it. , mom to Hannah, DOCgrad Cape Cod, Ma http://hannahsnoggin.typepad.com --- In Plagiocephaly , " mhalla12590 " <mhalla12590@y...> wrote: > I took my 3 month old son to Cranial Tech b/c my pediatrician said he > would benefit from the Doc Band. The office is 1 1/2 hours from my > home. The PT at Cranial Tech said he needed the band. My insurance > said they would pay for it if a neurosurgeon agreed it was necessary. > Needless to say, the neurosurgeon said my son has plagio, but he does > not need the band b/c his eyes are symmetrical and so are his ears. > Also, developmentally he is advanced. I am confused b/c his head is so > flat in the back. Has anyone else experienced this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2005 Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 What neuro did you see? Not all doctors are helmet friendly. If your ped says your son needs a band and Cranial Tech agrees, I'd definitely get him one. You don't need a prescription from a specialist, just ask your ped to write it. Many neurosurgeons are just looking at brain function and if they don't see that as a concern they won't recommend banding. Many children don't have facial asymmetry (especially with the brachy shape), but they can still have very severe flatness that you would want corrected. So, I definitely think you should just call your ped and ask them to write the presciption for you. Cranial Tech would not suggest a band to you if he wouldn't benefit from it. , mom to Hannah, DOCgrad Cape Cod, Ma http://hannahsnoggin.typepad.com --- In Plagiocephaly , " mhalla12590 " <mhalla12590@y...> wrote: > I took my 3 month old son to Cranial Tech b/c my pediatrician said he > would benefit from the Doc Band. The office is 1 1/2 hours from my > home. The PT at Cranial Tech said he needed the band. My insurance > said they would pay for it if a neurosurgeon agreed it was necessary. > Needless to say, the neurosurgeon said my son has plagio, but he does > not need the band b/c his eyes are symmetrical and so are his ears. > Also, developmentally he is advanced. I am confused b/c his head is so > flat in the back. Has anyone else experienced this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2005 Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 I agree with . You can get the Prescription from the pediatrician although from your post it sounds as if your Ins would pay ONLY if the prescription was from a Neurosurgeon? Check on that. If that's the case, then you may want to go try and find a more " band friendly " Neurosurgeon or craniofacial specialist. When we were looking into banding , we first went to a Neurosurgeon who did NOT recommend banding, but then got a 2nd opinion from a craniofacial surgeon and he gave us the prescription. Good luck. Remember... if YOU think he needs the band... then fight for it! Jen (11 mo), tort resolved, Hanger Grad EMily (3 years) > > I took my 3 month old son to Cranial Tech b/c my pediatrician said > he > > would benefit from the Doc Band. The office is 1 1/2 hours from my > > home. The PT at Cranial Tech said he needed the band. My insurance > > said they would pay for it if a neurosurgeon agreed it was > necessary. > > Needless to say, the neurosurgeon said my son has plagio, but he > does > > not need the band b/c his eyes are symmetrical and so are his ears. > > Also, developmentally he is advanced. I am confused b/c his head is > so > > flat in the back. Has anyone else experienced this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2005 Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 I agree with . You can get the Prescription from the pediatrician although from your post it sounds as if your Ins would pay ONLY if the prescription was from a Neurosurgeon? Check on that. If that's the case, then you may want to go try and find a more " band friendly " Neurosurgeon or craniofacial specialist. When we were looking into banding , we first went to a Neurosurgeon who did NOT recommend banding, but then got a 2nd opinion from a craniofacial surgeon and he gave us the prescription. Good luck. Remember... if YOU think he needs the band... then fight for it! Jen (11 mo), tort resolved, Hanger Grad EMily (3 years) > > I took my 3 month old son to Cranial Tech b/c my pediatrician said > he > > would benefit from the Doc Band. The office is 1 1/2 hours from my > > home. The PT at Cranial Tech said he needed the band. My insurance > > said they would pay for it if a neurosurgeon agreed it was > necessary. > > Needless to say, the neurosurgeon said my son has plagio, but he > does > > not need the band b/c his eyes are symmetrical and so are his ears. > > Also, developmentally he is advanced. I am confused b/c his head is > so > > flat in the back. Has anyone else experienced this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2005 Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 --Thanks, I will ask for a second opinion. - In Plagiocephaly , " Jen " <ronandjenvelez@p...> wrote: > I agree with . You can get the Prescription from the > pediatrician although from your post it sounds as if your Ins would > pay ONLY if the prescription was from a Neurosurgeon? Check on > that. If that's the case, then you may want to go try and find a > more " band friendly " Neurosurgeon or craniofacial specialist. When > we were looking into banding , we first went to a Neurosurgeon > who did NOT recommend banding, but then got a 2nd opinion from a > craniofacial surgeon and he gave us the prescription. > > Good luck. Remember... if YOU think he needs the band... then fight > for it! > > Jen > (11 mo), tort resolved, Hanger Grad > EMily (3 years) > > > > > > I took my 3 month old son to Cranial Tech b/c my pediatrician > said > > he > > > would benefit from the Doc Band. The office is 1 1/2 hours from > my > > > home. The PT at Cranial Tech said he needed the band. My > insurance > > > said they would pay for it if a neurosurgeon agreed it was > > necessary. > > > Needless to say, the neurosurgeon said my son has plagio, but he > > does > > > not need the band b/c his eyes are symmetrical and so are his > ears. > > > Also, developmentally he is advanced. I am confused b/c his head > is > > so > > > flat in the back. Has anyone else experienced this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2005 Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 --Thanks, I will ask for a second opinion. - In Plagiocephaly , " Jen " <ronandjenvelez@p...> wrote: > I agree with . You can get the Prescription from the > pediatrician although from your post it sounds as if your Ins would > pay ONLY if the prescription was from a Neurosurgeon? Check on > that. If that's the case, then you may want to go try and find a > more " band friendly " Neurosurgeon or craniofacial specialist. When > we were looking into banding , we first went to a Neurosurgeon > who did NOT recommend banding, but then got a 2nd opinion from a > craniofacial surgeon and he gave us the prescription. > > Good luck. Remember... if YOU think he needs the band... then fight > for it! > > Jen > (11 mo), tort resolved, Hanger Grad > EMily (3 years) > > > > > > I took my 3 month old son to Cranial Tech b/c my pediatrician > said > > he > > > would benefit from the Doc Band. The office is 1 1/2 hours from > my > > > home. The PT at Cranial Tech said he needed the band. My > insurance > > > said they would pay for it if a neurosurgeon agreed it was > > necessary. > > > Needless to say, the neurosurgeon said my son has plagio, but he > > does > > > not need the band b/c his eyes are symmetrical and so are his > ears. > > > Also, developmentally he is advanced. I am confused b/c his head > is > > so > > > flat in the back. Has anyone else experienced this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.