Guest guest Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 Can anyone that is or has been a patient of Dr. G elaborate on how he treats these deficiencies? The dated material on his website says that he views IVIG the same as chelation and HBOT - dangerous. He even elaborates that we do not know exactly what may be in IVIG that we are unable to screen for since it is a blood product. However some more recent posts on this site talk about Dr. G advocating intramuscular immunoglobulin. Since this is still a blood product, I am curious about Dr. G's change in his way of thinking about this. Has the screening process gotten better since he last talked about this on the website? We are seriously considering switching from our current autism doc to Dr. G but I would like to get a better idea of his thoughts on certain issues before we do so. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 He is more comfortable with IMGG than IVIG because he feels that there is much less chance for disease transmission with IMGG. In fact, I think he said that there has never been a case of transmission of disease through IMGG. He said it is made and processed differently than IVIG, plus the method of delivery (intramuscular instead of right into the bloodstream), may be part of why it has a better record. HTH, Caroline From: Ranee <rfear@...> Reply-< > Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:53:25 +0000 < > Subject: Immunoglobulin Deficiencies Can anyone that is or has been a patient of Dr. G elaborate on how he treats these deficiencies? The dated material on his website says that he views IVIG the same as chelation and HBOT - dangerous. He even elaborates that we do not know exactly what may be in IVIG that we are unable to screen for since it is a blood product. However some more recent posts on this site talk about Dr. G advocating intramuscular immunoglobulin. Since this is still a blood product, I am curious about Dr. G's change in his way of thinking about this. Has the screening process gotten better since he last talked about this on the website? We are seriously considering switching from our current autism doc to Dr. G but I would like to get a better idea of his thoughts on certain issues before we do so. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 Hi Ranee, My son just started with Dr. G about a month and a half ago after almost two years with a DAN doctor. Bottom line, I am so thankful I found him. I think that you will find Dr. G has very strong, definitive opinions about certain treatments. He is very conservative with treatments because he wants to see data that show they are safe. In some cases, he has seen a lot of harm. As a parent who has been doing this a while, it can be anxiety-producing if i think my son is missing the boat with a certain treatment. Dr. G is very methodical the way he works and there is reason behind everything... one thing at a time. Initially this was frustrating to me (having been used to leaving the DAN office with 20 different bottles and scripts), but now I find it a relief... we can see how the drug is affecting my son. > > Can anyone that is or has been a patient of Dr. G elaborate on how he treats these deficiencies? The dated material on his website says that he views IVIG the same as chelation and HBOT - dangerous. He even elaborates that we do not know exactly what may be in IVIG that we are unable to screen for since it is a blood product. However some more recent posts on this site talk about Dr. G advocating intramuscular immunoglobulin. Since this is still a blood product, I am curious about Dr. G's change in his way of thinking about this. Has the screening process gotten better since he last talked about this on the website? We are seriously considering switching from our current autism doc to Dr. G but I would like to get a better idea of his thoughts on certain issues before we do so. Thanks! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 My son started with DrG part way through IVIG treatment with another doctor. DrG is fine with it. He says while it probably won't cure him, it's the least harmful thing we've done and we have continued the treatment without seeing much from it. > > > > Can anyone that is or has been a patient of Dr. G elaborate on how he treats these deficiencies? The dated material on his website says that he views IVIG the same as chelation and HBOT - dangerous. He even elaborates that we do not know exactly what may be in IVIG that we are unable to screen for since it is a blood product. However some more recent posts on this site talk about Dr. G advocating intramuscular immunoglobulin. Since this is still a blood product, I am curious about Dr. G's change in his way of thinking about this. Has the screening process gotten better since he last talked about this on the website? We are seriously considering switching from our current autism doc to Dr. G but I would like to get a better idea of his thoughts on certain issues before we do so. Thanks! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.