Guest guest Posted August 6, 2002 Report Share Posted August 6, 2002 In a message dated 8/6/2002 8:09:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time, morrone@... writes: > frequency of checking the temperature of the > hydrocollator units. Anyone have any idea what is required? > Isn't it daily with a documented log. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2002 Report Share Posted August 6, 2002 Theresa, I have a log that we check monthly. In addition I have a temp guage in the unit so it can be checked each time. Be sure you know the mfgr recs on temps for that unit Jim Dunleavy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2002 Report Share Posted August 6, 2002 Check the manual that came with the individual hydrocollator. The inside of our lid says one thing, but the manual says something else regarding " temperature not to exceed... " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2002 Report Share Posted August 6, 2002 > In preparation for JCAHO I have been trying to find recommendations or > requirements for the frequency of checking the temperature of the > hydrocollator units. Anyone have any idea what is required? > Thanks for any reply. > Theresa Morrone > Director, PT > Columbia Presbyterian Center/ New York Presbyterian Hospital I think this issue provides a great illustration of focusing to intensely on accreditation standards. Speaking as one who has provided expert witness opinons on several burn cases involving hydrocollators, I would tell you that it is advisable to check temperatures prior to each application. Is that what an agency requires? I would argue that it is irrelevant. It is what professional, sound and prudent clinical judgment require. Ken Mailly, PT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2002 Report Share Posted August 7, 2002 > Check the manual that came with the individual hydrocollator. The inside of > our lid says one thing, but the manual says something else regarding > " temperature not to exceed... " This is all very interesting, however, I don't quite get the relevance of making daily documentations of the 160 degrees. If it happens to be a requirement for a governing body, certainly I respect that. Let us use this example to establish my point: The patient is burned by a hot pack treatment rendered by a Physical Therapist, Physical Therapist Assistant, or other supportive personnell within the stated clinic. If the daily log stated that the temp was, say, 110 or 120, 160 or even 175; is the patient any less injured? Is the therapist any less liable for the skin wound created by the application of this treatment? Peace Simonetti, PT Chestertown, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 9, 2002 Report Share Posted August 9, 2002 Are you suggesting that the persons who work for JCAHO and or various governing bodies are just former licensed health cvare providers who could not make a living treating patients??? Peace Simonetti, PT Chestertown, MD > Wow! What an apparently simple issue, but such lack of standardization. > Doesn't JCAHO like to justify their existence, and have us all chasing our > tails! No wonder the medical system is going broke and there is less and > less money in the pot to deliver actual patient care. OK enough already > right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.