Re: Study Linking Vaccine to Autism Was Fraud, Journal ReportsBy THE A...

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 1/7/2011 9:38:01 P.M. Central Standard Time,

elyse-g@... writes:

<<The analysis, by British journalist Deer, found that despite the

claim in Wakefield's paper that the 12 children studied were normal until

they had the MMR shot, five had previously documented developmental problems.

Deer also found that all the cases were somehow misrepresented when he

compared data from medical records and the children's parents. >>

I appreciate you posting this article. All the news reports and articles

I'd read so far were so vague about the falsified/misrepresented data.

I've been very curious to know what data was misrepresented. This at least

mentions one of the specific issues. Have any of you seen any articles or

information that specifies the other things that were misrepresented? Some

of the news reports make it sound like the doctor made up all the

information, and one doctor on a news program actually said that many of the

kids

studies didn't even have autism but I haven't been able to find mention of

that anywhere else.

<<Many other published studies have shown no connection between the MMR

vaccination and autism. >>

Do any of you have information/citations of any of these studies? The

only studies I've found that compare kids after getting MMR shots to

unvaccinated controls was looking at inflamatory bowel diseases and gastritis.

I'd

be interested in reading the ones that studied MMR vaccination and autism

directly.

Gaylen

[Guest guest]

This is Bigpharma's scrambling to try to keep the brainwashed in check. This is

complete hogwash. Data was not misrepresented and the other study authors

distanced themselves from the study b/c they saw what was coming. They NEVER

said there was anything wrong or invalid about the study. Wakefield stood his

ground and took the fall... They took his license b/c he dared to question

bigpharma. Even when they took his license, the committee couldn't find anything

wrong with the study. But they knew if they could just make Wakefield look bad

and take his license then they could run articles like this one and so many

others. Also, parents wanted to separate the MMR until more study was done but

he UK pulled the singles so they had to choose the 3in1 or nothing! So, some

said forget it. BUT data actually shows LESS cases of measles during the time of

decreased vaccination which actually suggests that the vaccine is reponsible for

outbreaks. When they say a vaccine is " killed " that means they hoped they killed

all of the virus but it's impossible. That plus the toxins, human tissue cow

tissue monkey tissue YUM. Don't be suckered by this latest propaganda burst.

Might be in response to the data showing a 700% increase in miscarriages since

last year swine flu vaccine. I have a friend who lost her baby after her flu

shot (doc said she and her baby would DIE from the flu if she didn't get it). Of

course individually you can just tell these women that it was just a natural

miscarriage and that's what she believes. There is so much info online released

using the Freedom of Information Act and data straight from the CDC. But,

bigpharma knows that most people prefer quick soundbites and easy snares eve if

they're wrong.

God bless,

Jen

On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Googahly@... wrote:

> In a message dated 1/7/2011 9:38:01 P.M. Central Standard Time,

> elyse-g@... writes:

>

> <<The analysis, by British journalist Deer, found that despite the

> claim in Wakefield's paper that the 12 children studied were normal until

> they had the MMR shot, five had previously documented developmental problems.

> Deer also found that all the cases were somehow misrepresented when he

> compared data from medical records and the children's parents. >>

>

> I appreciate you posting this article. All the news reports and articles

> I'd read so far were so vague about the falsified/misrepresented data.

> I've been very curious to know what data was misrepresented. This at least

> mentions one of the specific issues. Have any of you seen any articles or

> information that specifies the other things that were misrepresented? Some

> of the news reports make it sound like the doctor made up all the

> information, and one doctor on a news program actually said that many of the

kids

> studies didn't even have autism but I haven't been able to find mention of

> that anywhere else.

>

> <<Many other published studies have shown no connection between the MMR

> vaccination and autism. >>

>

> Do any of you have information/citations of any of these studies? The

> only studies I've found that compare kids after getting MMR shots to

> unvaccinated controls was looking at inflamatory bowel diseases and gastritis.

I'd

> be interested in reading the ones that studied MMR vaccination and autism

> directly.

> Gaylen

>

>