Guest guest Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 ________________________________ From: < > < > Sent: Thu Mar 10 13:49:57 2011 Subject: RE: Why the reluctance? Personally, I feel that it's because the American Academy of Pediatrics persists in considering it a development, psychological disorder for which there is no treatment and not a medical illness. And, because of all the controversy around the vaccination arguments.that issue has detracted from the issues that face our children dealing with this medical issue. Our pediatrician went off on a tangent just the other day, very angrily I might add, about Dr. Wakefield and what a criminal quack he is. I could not even get a word in edgewise that my son has a completely different issue. Kristy Nardini Tazzini Stainless Steel Bottles www.tazzini.com kristy@... <mailto:kristy%40tazzini.com> 858.243.1929 <http://www.facebook.com/tazzinicompany> Find us on Facebook! <http://www.twitter.com/tazzini> Follow us on Twitter! From: <mailto:%40> [mailto: <mailto:%40> ] On Behalf Of moniquedias26 Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 9:57 AM <mailto:%40> Subject: Why the reluctance? For those of you who have been using the protocol for a while, I was just interested to get your opinions on why this protocol has not caught on in the mainstream yet? From reading Dr. Goldberg's papers and presentations, it seems as though he's been fighting for this immune dysfunction connection to be recognized for a long while now. Why do you all think the medical community is so reluctant? What are the political reasons, if any? Just curious, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.