Re: Compare BeamRay Rife & EMEM5A rife machines

[Guest guest]

Re: EMEM 5A

I don't know where you are getting your time frame for this unit from......Dan 's instructions that come with it are not set in stone - he cautions users who are new to treatment and who have not detoxed to go slowly as they can experience quite a herx.

In speaking directly with him later on...he said that it is fine to run through frequencies and to use the machine for over an hour.

I run through strings of frequencies at about 4 mins each at a total of about 1 and a half hours.

[Guest guest]

Hi;

i do not know enough about the EMEM to comment on that machine, but i have used

the BeamRay on a few occasions, at a friend's house. The problem with the

BeamRay is that you are not able to program in frequencies. You must use the

programs already in the machine, which are listed as " Lyme " or " Babesia " , for

example, but you have no way of knowing which frequencies are in those programs.

Now that I am learning about Rife machines, I understand the benefit of having

control over the frequencies. And yes, the programs take anywhere from 60 to

90 minutes and they recommend daily or twice daily treatments. Not very

convenient.

Regards, JL

>

> Does anyone know enough about these two machines to compare for me? I'm

looking

> to purchase a machine. The EMEM5A can be purchased for under $1,000.00. The

> BeamRay machine is over $5,000.00. From what I understand, each treatment

> session with the BeamRay last anywhere from 1.5 hours to 2 hours and are done

> several day per week. The EMEM5A treatment sessions last 8 min and are done 1

to

> 2 times per week. The guy selling the EMEM5A says this machine is more

powerful

> than others. I don't understand how one machine emitting a frequency of 5Mhz

can

> be more powerful than another machine emitting a frequency of 5Mhz. I'm

looking

> at possibly having to purchase multiple machines to treat multiple members of

my

> family and I want to do it in the most economical fashion. Any help on the

> subject is appreciated. Thanks, Randy

>