, Last Time I'll Bother You

[Guest guest]

I do not have to defer to my doctor - I need her for the prescription. I myself simply wanted to get off these things as fast as possible - so what this was really about is the possibility of it being possible. I gather you think it's impossible. I did want her to learn something - doctors won't learn these things if they don't find out from their patients. The reason I'm glad she's open to my going slower is because I am dependent on her for the prescription - and that is all. So her cooperation is of importance to me. To recap - *I* wanted to go faster. I wanted to know if you think it's possible. I want the doctor to learn something. I won't bother you again, no matter how I end up doing it. Regards, Kendraccreel_04064

wrote: >> Hi,> > I should have read all the messages before I started replying a few minutes ago!!! > > All I can say, , is that I thought I would risk going as fast as she said, cut by cut, because I got away with it with benzodiazapines in Jan/Feb. For me, if I don't feel worse, that is good enough. Since so many other people seem to get off fine, why can't I be one of them? >> ** You can't be one of them because you're too concerned about deferring to your doctor.> > , if I try it her way and feel "as fine" as I do now,

couldn't it be possible for me? She is open to going slower if I have *any* problems. So I thought I would take it cut by cut - then as said before, I can still reinstate.I am willing to take some risk, not just because as long as I am taking these, it looks like I will have problems from them, but also so that if she sees I have to go slower and that there is now wine or anything else to blame it on she might learn something!!>> ** What is the difference of she's open to it or not?? << As I wrote you and , it would be so good to have something to cite and that maybe even has a German translation (which I would look for). I don't think I'm up to sorting through sites from the beginning already in German, altho I will do my best.>> ** This is a perfect

illustration of what I mean. for some reason, you think you need to convince her of this. I'd be willing to bet that there are only 10 people here who have the cooperation of their physicians and they have this not because they convinced them of anythig but because they told them what they were going to do and wouldn't budge from that position. This is really all the energy I'm spending on this.

[Guest guest]

>

> I do not have to defer to my doctor - I need her for the

prescription. I myself simply wanted to get off these things as fast

as possible - so what this was really about is the possibility of it

being possible. I gather you think it's impossible.

>

> I did want her to learn something - doctors won't learn these

things if they don't find out from their patients.

>

> The reason I'm glad she's open to my going slower is because I am

dependent on her for the prescription - and that is all. So her

cooperation is of importance to me.

>

> To recap - *I* wanted to go faster. I wanted to know if you think

it's possible. I want the doctor to learn something.

>

> I won't bother you again, no matter how I end up doing it.>>

** I seriously don't get this. If you are not deferringto your

doctor, why are you aaking for evidence for your doctor?? This makes

no sense, Kendra.

I see you're offended by my bluntness.

You came here, you asked questions, you got answers, you didn't

like the answers you got so you proceeded to keep asking questions

trying to get the answers to change so they were more pleasing to

you. Yes, I responded with impatience, and will every time in this

type of situation.