Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 I want to thank Patti for posting that reprint article on the evils of aspartame. By reading this article you can get a good idea of what to look for in order to determine the validity of an news item. For example look for anecdotes such as the one about Florence Joyner-Griffith jogging and drinking a diet Coke with Bill Clinton. No athlete would job and drink a Coke. First the stuff would tend to fizz and go all over you while you ran. Second, most athletes drink sports drinks or water because staying hydrated during exercise is the best way to go. Second, look at the littany of woe mentioned as caused by aspartame, about 7 or 8 different serious problems, all unrelated. Is this really possible? Unlikely. Consider the idea of methanol poisoning. The amount of aspartame in any given food item is very small. So, correspondingly, the amount of methanol produced as a breakdown product would be that much smaller. Definitely, ingesting methanol in large amounts is dangerous. We see one or two such poisoning a year in our ER. But you have to drink a good glass or two full of methanol. In a diet Coke there might be a a tenth of a teaspoon, if that of aspartame. So the amount of methanol produced, if it is even a breakdown product of aspartame which I'm not sure it is, wouldn't be enough to do much of anything to you. Third, the issue of MS and Lupus has been addressed by a variety of health agencies in response to one of the wackier religious groups posting information about aspartame causing MS, on their website. This has been totally refuted. So there you have it. A lesson on how to distinguish non-science (or non-sense) from true science. Aubrey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.