Guest guest Posted February 22, 2000 Report Share Posted February 22, 2000 Barbara & Kim, Fred, and all prefer to have the injection on the table. I can't tell you how many times I have had to duke it out with the nurses & / or technicians who wanted to slap an IV in as soon as we got there. The IV is for the convenience of the people doing the MRIs not for the convenience of the patient in most cases. The only exception to this I can think of is if you have veins that are hard to get and they need to take extra time and care so they can hit the veins without stabbing you several times. Even then it is arguable as to whose benefit the IV is for, but MRI time is expensive, so on that point I concede the possibility of need instead of convenience. I don't allow IVs for the kids' MRIs and Fred doesn't let them put IVs in him for the gadolineum because we're trying to save those veins for times that they might need surgery. Having read enough stories on here of people whose veins are blown to the point where they have to have IVs in their neck, shoulder, etc. I see no reason to risk veins by having an IV sitting there when a quick shot would do the job. Barbara, I missed your original note about the shots being painful, but if it is the needle as opposed to the medication, it might be worthwhile to ask them to use a smaller needle than usual. If it's the gadolineum itself, I don't think there's much you can do about that. I hope this doesn't sound like a screaming note. My blood pressure probably goes up just thinking about the IVs for MRIs because of all the fighting I have had to do to stop them. I finally got the primary care physician to write " NO IV " on the MRI order. That helped but I still have to stand guard. ...Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.