Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Iolanda, sometimes we connect a negative connotation to the word itself...and can become a barrier in and of itself to feeling it what would the feeling be without the word? Imagine that just a feeling which can be more manageable, and allow oneself to dip into it and fully feel it can I ask you, when do you notice there isn't a feeling of loneliness? > > Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my questions) > > Specifically to - > > > I don't think I've seen any plan for action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? > > I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years and I know the types > of things that should be done. I've organsied community groups, I 'own'/run a few online > email groups, I've attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting > neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community events etc. Hey, I > even organised - on my own - the 25 year primary school reunion and 20 year high school > reunion. What I've done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness in > this area. So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was calling the local community > centre about something. So I don't need steps as such but just do something if the > opportunity arises but don't worry about it. > > Specifically to Helena > > > Iolanda, what IS your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by that? > > I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying them the wrong way > (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval' problems sometimes) I'll just give examples > which is easier for me ....... > > I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) and I'm sure I said it > differently than in the book because I just said it while I was in bed and didn't remember > the right way to say it ........ > > But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started to think more about > the loneliness and get much more unhappy with the word and why I was saying it. So just > saying the word itself made me unhappy > > Plus the whole " scientific " way of wording it is so against my thinking and it makes me > somehow more conscious that I'm using those words etc because of a problem etc etc. then > that makes me feel bad in itself. > > So the 2 reasons above then act as a " reminder " of why I'm using the strange-sounding > technique ..... because I've got a loss of something that means something to me. > If there was a way to handle it without making it so much of a " reminder " then I know it > would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique doesn't leave the > " reminder " there. > > > > I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took the trouble to send > recently. I'm pretty " sensitive " at the moment about getting " told off " by anybody in the > group so please be gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling me > I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't send the email ........ > > Thanks > > iolanda > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 I understand some of what your saying and feeling. I too have run the gameit of meet up groups and trying to make new friends. It doesnt quite work out most of the time. I question myself on this one. In other words, I think whats wrong with me. But people have their own relatives, friends and such from the lifetime that I was not a part of It seems it takes a while for them to let you in if at all. Coming from an unstable home, followed by divorce ,etc.. it would mean the world to me to find my flock of geese. > > > > Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my questions) > > > > Specifically to - > > > > > I don't think I've seen any plan for action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? > > > > I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years and I know the types > > of things that should be done. I've organsied community groups, I 'own'/run a few online > > email groups, I've attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting > > neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community events etc. Hey, I > > even organised - on my own - the 25 year primary school reunion and 20 year high school > > reunion. What I've done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness in > > this area. So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was calling the local community > > centre about something. So I don't need steps as such but just do something if the > > opportunity arises but don't worry about it. > > > > Specifically to Helena > > > > > Iolanda, what IS your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by that? > > > > I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying them the wrong way > > (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval' problems sometimes) I'll just give examples > > which is easier for me ....... > > > > I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) and I'm sure I said it > > differently than in the book because I just said it while I was in bed and didn't remember > > the right way to say it ........ > > > > But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started to think more about > > the loneliness and get much more unhappy with the word and why I was saying it. So just > > saying the word itself made me unhappy > > > > Plus the whole " scientific " way of wording it is so against my thinking and it makes me > > somehow more conscious that I'm using those words etc because of a problem etc etc. then > > that makes me feel bad in itself. > > > > So the 2 reasons above then act as a " reminder " of why I'm using the strange-sounding > > technique ..... because I've got a loss of something that means something to me. > > If there was a way to handle it without making it so much of a " reminder " then I know it > > would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique doesn't leave the > > " reminder " there. > > > > > > > > I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took the trouble to send > > recently. I'm pretty " sensitive " at the moment about getting " told off " by anybody in the > > group so please be gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling me > > I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't send the email ........ > > > > Thanks > > > > iolanda > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Hi Iolanda, Thanks for responding! I think I now have a better understanding of "where you are coming from", as they say. It seems to me that your brain does appear to work quite differently from most, and I think this may be due to your memory issues, brain trauma, etc. that you described. I never thought of the words used in the exercise instructions as being scientific, artificial, etc., and I've never heard others say that either. That you view them that way does NOT mean you are stupid, stubborn, or less intelligent! I think it is great that you recognize how your brain works and are thus able to choose the things that work best for you - this is something we all need to do, but is especially true for someone who had experienced a brain injury. You need to trust yourself on such matters, even if it seems that others don't understand. Just be sure that you are not using your situation as an excuse for any unwillingness on your part - something we all need to be aware of, no matter what our physical / mental / emotional circumstances. You seem to be doing great in reaching out to others for connection; actually, much better than I am doing. So if the level of connection you desire isn't happening, and you are doing all you can toward your values, then you need to just take a deep breath and be willing to have the sadness about feeling lonely. I tell myself all the time that it is OK to feel lonely - I mean, who wouldn't be if they were living my particular life? It doesn't mean I am unattractive or not good enough. It just is. Helena To: "ACT" <ACT_for_the_Public >Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 8:10:11 AMSubject: Thanks - and specific replies Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my questions)Specifically to - I don't think I've seen any plan for action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years and I know the types of things that should be done. I've organsied community groups, I 'own'/run a few online email groups, I've attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community events etc. Hey, I even organised - on my own - the 25 year primary school reunion and 20 year high school reunion. What I've done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness in this area. So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was calling the local community centre about something. So I don't need steps as such but just do something if the opportunity arises but don't worry about it.Specifically to Helena Iolanda, what IS your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by that? I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying them the wrong way (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval' problems sometimes) I'll just give examples which is easier for me .......I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) and I'm sure I said it differently than in the book because I just said it while I was in bed and didn't remember the right way to say it ........ But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started to think more about the loneliness and get much more unhappy with the word and why I was saying it. So just saying the word itself made me unhappyPlus the whole "scientific" way of wording it is so against my thinking and it makes me somehow more conscious that I'm using those words etc because of a problem etc etc. then that makes me feel bad in itself.So the 2 reasons above then act as a "reminder" of why I'm using the strange-sounding technique ..... because I've got a loss of something that means something to me. If there was a way to handle it without making it so much of a "reminder" then I know it would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique doesn't leave the "reminder" there.I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took the trouble to send recently. I'm pretty "sensitive" at the moment about getting "told off" by anybody in the group so please be gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling me I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't send the email ........Thanksiolanda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 That's fantastic action, really inspiring stuff. Clearly the problems you are having are not getting in the way of valued living. I think some others will be reading the forum with some jealousy, as many many people struggle to take the sort of steps that you've been taking with, it seems, little difficulty. Be proud.I made friends when I started joining groups which had regular meetings, rather than one-off events. I joined a church group that ran toddler activities; a local political party; and a local community action group). I wasn't looking for friendships from these, but they sort of "happened". x Subject: Thanks - and specific repliesTo: "ACT" <ACT_for_the_Public >Date: Thursday, 28 July, 2011, 12:10 Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my questions) Specifically to - I don't think I've seen any plan for action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years and I know the types of things that should be done. I've organsied community groups, I 'own'/run a few online email groups, I've attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community events etc. Hey, I even organised - on my own - the 25 year primary school reunion and 20 year high school reunion. What I've done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness in this area. So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was calling the local community centre about something. So I don't need steps as such but just do something if the opportunity arises but don't worry about it. Specifically to Helena Iolanda, what IS your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by that? I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying them the wrong way (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval' problems sometimes) I'll just give examples which is easier for me ........ I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) and I'm sure I said it differently than in the book because I just said it while I was in bed and didn't remember the right way to say it ........ But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started to think more about the loneliness and get much more unhappy with the word and why I was saying it. So just saying the word itself made me unhappy Plus the whole "scientific" way of wording it is so against my thinking and it makes me somehow more conscious that I'm using those words etc because of a problem etc etc. then that makes me feel bad in itself. So the 2 reasons above then act as a "reminder" of why I'm using the strange-sounding technique ..... because I've got a loss of something that means something to me. If there was a way to handle it without making it so much of a "reminder" then I know it would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique doesn't leave the "reminder" there. I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took the trouble to send recently. I'm pretty "sensitive" at the moment about getting "told off" by anybody in the group so please be gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling me I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't send the email ........ Thanks iolanda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 That's fantastic action, really inspiring stuff. Clearly the problems you are having are not getting in the way of valued living. I think some others will be reading the forum with some jealousy, as many many people struggle to take the sort of steps that you've been taking with, it seems, little difficulty. Be proud.I made friends when I started joining groups which had regular meetings, rather than one-off events. I joined a church group that ran toddler activities; a local political party; and a local community action group). I wasn't looking for friendships from these, but they sort of "happened". x Subject: Thanks - and specific repliesTo: "ACT" <ACT_for_the_Public >Date: Thursday, 28 July, 2011, 12:10 Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my questions) Specifically to - I don't think I've seen any plan for action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years and I know the types of things that should be done. I've organsied community groups, I 'own'/run a few online email groups, I've attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community events etc. Hey, I even organised - on my own - the 25 year primary school reunion and 20 year high school reunion. What I've done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness in this area. So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was calling the local community centre about something. So I don't need steps as such but just do something if the opportunity arises but don't worry about it. Specifically to Helena Iolanda, what IS your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by that? I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying them the wrong way (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval' problems sometimes) I'll just give examples which is easier for me ........ I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) and I'm sure I said it differently than in the book because I just said it while I was in bed and didn't remember the right way to say it ........ But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started to think more about the loneliness and get much more unhappy with the word and why I was saying it. So just saying the word itself made me unhappy Plus the whole "scientific" way of wording it is so against my thinking and it makes me somehow more conscious that I'm using those words etc because of a problem etc etc. then that makes me feel bad in itself. So the 2 reasons above then act as a "reminder" of why I'm using the strange-sounding technique ..... because I've got a loss of something that means something to me. If there was a way to handle it without making it so much of a "reminder" then I know it would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique doesn't leave the "reminder" there. I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took the trouble to send recently. I'm pretty "sensitive" at the moment about getting "told off" by anybody in the group so please be gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling me I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't send the email ........ Thanks iolanda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Hi Iolanda, It's me again! If it is OK, I wanted to say a couple of things in light of your very interesting answer to Helena's very good question. 1) My own sense is that many, many people have a similar reaction to yours to do with the defusion technique of " I'm having the thought that ____ " etc. In fact not just this but many many techniques raise objections. What is actually happening when we think " Oh, the word X is so upsetting, " or " This is unnatural " is that we are having another thought & getting snared by it rather than noticing it as a thought. 2) This may already be apparent - but it doesn't seem to me necessary or useful to " defuse " from feeling lonely if, as you say, you are doing all that you can about making friends under the circumstances. It is only useful to defuse from thoughts if they seem like something we must run from & this running away narrows our life. The reason for it is one you've probably already heard: often what hurts most reflects what we care about most and vice versa. Get rid of the pain of caring, and what happens to the caring? Do we really want to get rid of it too? Of course some thoughts we may explore & eventually question because they do not seem like values, but commandments from society, etc. There is a thread just now on the ACT professional list that speaks to this also. Without getting into detail, here is a lovely quote (somewhat abridged) from that thread: " Loving someone always comes with the other side of the coin: fear, pain, loss. You can't have the one without the other, so I would validate having these feelings and approaching them as the mark of deep love. " So the pain of deep loneliness, so long as it does not drive us into a hole, might speak to a deep value of connection & thus be something to honor. When I am hurting, sometimes I am able to look at it as a chance to cherish feelings that so often I spend time rejecting. Those times I can manage this, it makes the world a little bigger. - Randy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Hi Iolanda, It's me again! If it is OK, I wanted to say a couple of things in light of your very interesting answer to Helena's very good question. 1) My own sense is that many, many people have a similar reaction to yours to do with the defusion technique of " I'm having the thought that ____ " etc. In fact not just this but many many techniques raise objections. What is actually happening when we think " Oh, the word X is so upsetting, " or " This is unnatural " is that we are having another thought & getting snared by it rather than noticing it as a thought. 2) This may already be apparent - but it doesn't seem to me necessary or useful to " defuse " from feeling lonely if, as you say, you are doing all that you can about making friends under the circumstances. It is only useful to defuse from thoughts if they seem like something we must run from & this running away narrows our life. The reason for it is one you've probably already heard: often what hurts most reflects what we care about most and vice versa. Get rid of the pain of caring, and what happens to the caring? Do we really want to get rid of it too? Of course some thoughts we may explore & eventually question because they do not seem like values, but commandments from society, etc. There is a thread just now on the ACT professional list that speaks to this also. Without getting into detail, here is a lovely quote (somewhat abridged) from that thread: " Loving someone always comes with the other side of the coin: fear, pain, loss. You can't have the one without the other, so I would validate having these feelings and approaching them as the mark of deep love. " So the pain of deep loneliness, so long as it does not drive us into a hole, might speak to a deep value of connection & thus be something to honor. When I am hurting, sometimes I am able to look at it as a chance to cherish feelings that so often I spend time rejecting. Those times I can manage this, it makes the world a little bigger. - Randy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Hi You are a very nice person and I do hope and pray you find really good friends. Best wishes from Francis To: ACT_for_the_Public From: lday54@...Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:54:41 +0000Subject: Re: Thanks - and specific replies I understand some of what your saying and feeling. I too have run the gameit of meet up groups and trying to make new friends. It doesnt quite work out most of the time. I question myself on this one. In other words, I think whats wrong with me. But people have their own relatives, friends and such from the lifetime that I was not a part of It seems it takes a while for them to let you in if at all. Coming from an unstable home, followed by divorce ,etc.. it would mean the world to me to find my flock of geese. > >> > Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my questions)> > > > Specifically to -> > > > > I don't think I've seen any plan for action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? > > > > I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years and I know the types > > of things that should be done. I've organsied community groups, I 'own'/run a few online > > email groups, I've attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting > > neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community events etc. Hey, I > > even organised - on my own - the 25 year primary school reunion and 20 year high school > > reunion. What I've done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness in > > this area. So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was calling the local community > > centre about something. So I don't need steps as such but just do something if the > > opportunity arises but don't worry about it.> > > > Specifically to Helena> > > > > Iolanda, what IS your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by that? > > > > I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying them the wrong way > > (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval' problems sometimes) I'll just give examples > > which is easier for me .......> > > > I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) and I'm sure I said it > > differently than in the book because I just said it while I was in bed and didn't remember > > the right way to say it ........> > > > But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started to think more about > > the loneliness and get much more unhappy with the word and why I was saying it. So just > > saying the word itself made me unhappy> > > > Plus the whole "scientific" way of wording it is so against my thinking and it makes me > > somehow more conscious that I'm using those words etc because of a problem etc etc. then > > that makes me feel bad in itself.> > > > So the 2 reasons above then act as a "reminder" of why I'm using the strange-sounding > > technique ..... because I've got a loss of something that means something to me. > > If there was a way to handle it without making it so much of a "reminder" then I know it > > would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique doesn't leave the > > "reminder" there.> > > > > > > > I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took the trouble to send > > recently. I'm pretty "sensitive" at the moment about getting "told off" by anybody in the > > group so please be gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling me > > I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't send the email ........> > > > Thanks> > > > iolanda> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Hi You are a very nice person and I do hope and pray you find really good friends. Best wishes from Francis To: ACT_for_the_Public From: lday54@...Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:54:41 +0000Subject: Re: Thanks - and specific replies I understand some of what your saying and feeling. I too have run the gameit of meet up groups and trying to make new friends. It doesnt quite work out most of the time. I question myself on this one. In other words, I think whats wrong with me. But people have their own relatives, friends and such from the lifetime that I was not a part of It seems it takes a while for them to let you in if at all. Coming from an unstable home, followed by divorce ,etc.. it would mean the world to me to find my flock of geese. > >> > Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my questions)> > > > Specifically to -> > > > > I don't think I've seen any plan for action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? > > > > I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years and I know the types > > of things that should be done. I've organsied community groups, I 'own'/run a few online > > email groups, I've attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting > > neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community events etc. Hey, I > > even organised - on my own - the 25 year primary school reunion and 20 year high school > > reunion. What I've done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness in > > this area. So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was calling the local community > > centre about something. So I don't need steps as such but just do something if the > > opportunity arises but don't worry about it.> > > > Specifically to Helena> > > > > Iolanda, what IS your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by that? > > > > I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying them the wrong way > > (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval' problems sometimes) I'll just give examples > > which is easier for me .......> > > > I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) and I'm sure I said it > > differently than in the book because I just said it while I was in bed and didn't remember > > the right way to say it ........> > > > But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started to think more about > > the loneliness and get much more unhappy with the word and why I was saying it. So just > > saying the word itself made me unhappy> > > > Plus the whole "scientific" way of wording it is so against my thinking and it makes me > > somehow more conscious that I'm using those words etc because of a problem etc etc. then > > that makes me feel bad in itself.> > > > So the 2 reasons above then act as a "reminder" of why I'm using the strange-sounding > > technique ..... because I've got a loss of something that means something to me. > > If there was a way to handle it without making it so much of a "reminder" then I know it > > would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique doesn't leave the > > "reminder" there.> > > > > > > > I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took the trouble to send > > recently. I'm pretty "sensitive" at the moment about getting "told off" by anybody in the > > group so please be gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling me > > I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't send the email ........> > > > Thanks> > > > iolanda> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2011 Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 I consider this to be a judgemental post which I shall ignore. Everyone on this list is trying their best, and some folk find things harder time than others. We all have our different vulnerabilties and difficulties. Kv > > > Subject: Thanks - and specific replies > To: " ACT " <ACT_for_the_Public > > Date: Thursday, 28 July, 2011, 12:10 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my > questions) > > > > Specifically to - > > > > I don't think I've seen any plan for > action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? > > > I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years > and I know the types of things that should be done. I've organsied > community groups, I 'own'/run a few online email groups, I've > attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting > neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community > events etc. Hey, I even organised - on my own - the 25 year > primary school reunion and 20 year high school reunion. What I've > done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness > in this area.  So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was > calling the local community centre about something. So I don't need > steps as such but just do something if the opportunity arises but > don't worry about it. > > > > Specifically to Helena > > > > Iolanda, what IS > your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by > that? > > > I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying > them the wrong way (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval' > problems sometimes) I'll just give examples which is easier for me > ....... > > > > I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) > and I'm sure I said it differently than in the book because I just > said it while I was in bed and didn't remember the right way to say > it ........  > > > > But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started > to think more about the loneliness and get much more unhappy with > the word and why I was saying it. So just saying the word itself > made me unhappy > > > > Plus the whole " scientific " way of wording it is so against my > thinking and it makes me somehow more conscious that I'm using those > words etc because of a problem etc etc. then that makes me feel > bad in itself. > > > > So the 2 reasons above then act as a " reminder " of why I'm using the > strange-sounding technique .....   because I've got a loss of > something that means something to me.     If there was a way to > handle it without making it so much of a " reminder " then I know it > would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique > doesn't leave the " reminder " there. > > > > > > > > I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took > the trouble to send recently. I'm pretty " sensitive " at the moment > about getting " told off " by anybody in the group so please be > gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling > me I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't > send the email ........ > > > > Thanks > > > > iolanda > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2011 Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 Oh dear, I really am very sorry, that was not my intention.I'm sure I'll do better next time. xSubject: Re: Thanks - and specific repliesTo: ACT_for_the_Public Date: Friday, 29 July, 2011, 15:09I consider this to be a judgemental post which I shall ignore. Everyone on this list is trying their best, and some folk find things harder time than others. We all have our different vulnerabilties and difficulties.Kv > > From: cyberfriend > Subject: Thanks - and specific replies> To: "ACT" <ACT_for_the_Public >> Date: Thursday, 28 July, 2011, 12:10> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my> questions)> > > > Specifically to - > > > > I don't think I've seen any plan for> action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? > > > I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years> and I know the types of things that should be done. I've organsied> community groups, I 'own'/run a few online email groups, I've> attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting> neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community> events etc. Hey, I even organised - on my own - the 25 year> primary school reunion and 20 year high school reunion. What I've> done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness> in this area. So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was> calling the local community centre about something. So I don't need> steps as such but just do something if the opportunity arises but> don't worry about it.> > > > Specifically to Helena> > > > Iolanda, what IS> your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by> that? > > > I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying> them the wrong way (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval'> problems sometimes) I'll just give examples which is easier for me> .......> > > > I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) > and I'm sure I said it differently than in the book because I just> said it while I was in bed and didn't remember the right way to say> it ........ > > > > But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started> to think more about the loneliness and get much more unhappy with> the word and why I was saying it. So just saying the word itself> made me unhappy> > > > Plus the whole "scientific" way of wording it is so against my> thinking and it makes me somehow more conscious that I'm using those> words etc because of a problem etc etc. then that makes me feel> bad in itself.> > > > So the 2 reasons above then act as a "reminder" of why I'm using the> strange-sounding technique ..... because I've got a loss of> something that means something to me. If there was a way to> handle it without making it so much of a "reminder" then I know it> would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique> doesn't leave the "reminder" there.> > > > > > > > I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took> the trouble to send recently. I'm pretty "sensitive" at the moment> about getting "told off" by anybody in the group so please be> gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling> me I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't> send the email ........> > > > Thanks> > > > iolanda>------------------------------------For other ACT materials and list serves see www.contextualpsychology.orgIf you do not wish to belong to ACT_for_the_Public, you may unsubscribe by sending an email to ACT_for_the_Public-unsubscribe@...! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ACT_for_the_Public/<*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional<*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ACT_for_the_Public/join (Yahoo! ID required)<*> To change settings via email: ACT_for_the_Public-digest ACT_for_the_Public-fullfeatured <*> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2011 Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 , you have nothing for which to apologize. I remember these words of wisdom you posted some months ago; I was so impressed I saved them: I reckon this group spends FAR too much time worrying about saying the right thing, in the right way, at the right time, not too much, not too little, forever apologising, starting again, defining what we mean. And so on. it's a waste, in my opinion! Just continue to be the caring and compassionate person you have proven yourself to be on this list and don't take responsibility for not pleasing everyone all the time. Thanks for being real, for being you. Helena To: "ACT for the Public" <ACT_for_the_Public >Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 11:51:26 AMSubject: Re: Re: Thanks - and specific replies Oh dear, I really am very sorry, that was not my intention.I'm sure I'll do better next time. x Subject: Re: Thanks - and specific repliesTo: ACT_for_the_Public Date: Friday, 29 July, 2011, 15:09 I consider this to be a judgemental post which I shall ignore. Everyone on this list is trying their best, and some folk find things harder time than others. We all have our different vulnerabilties and difficulties.Kv > > > Subject: Thanks - and specific replies> To: "ACT" <ACT_for_the_Public >> Date: Thursday, 28 July, 2011, 12:10> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my> questions)> > > > Specifically to - > > > > I don't think I've seen any plan for> action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? > > > I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years> and I know the types of things that should be done. I've organsied> community groups, I 'own'/run a few online email groups, I've> attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting> neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community> events etc. Hey, I even organised - on my own - the 25 year> primary school reunion and 20 year high school reunion. What I've> done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness> in this area. So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was> calling the local community centre about something. So I don't need> steps as such but just do something if the opportunity arises but> don't worry about it.> > > > Specifically to Helena> > > > Iolanda, what IS> your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by> that? > > > I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying> them the wrong way (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval'> problems sometimes) I'll just give examples which is easier for me> .......> > > > I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) > and I'm sure I said it differently than in the book because I just> said it while I was in bed and didn't remember the right way to say> it ........ > > > > But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started> to think more about the loneliness and get much more unhappy with> the word and why I was saying it. So just saying the word itself> made me unhappy> > > > Plus the whole "scientific" way of wording it is so against my> thinking and it makes me somehow more conscious that I'm using those> words etc because of a problem etc etc. then that makes me feel> bad in itself.> > > > So the 2 reasons above then act as a "reminder" of why I'm using the> strange-sounding technique ..... because I've got a loss of> something that means something to me. If there was a way to> handle it without making it so much of a "reminder" then I know it> would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique> doesn't leave the "reminder" there.> > > > > > > > I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took> the trouble to send recently. I'm pretty "sensitive" at the moment> about getting "told off" by anybody in the group so please be> gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling> me I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't> send the email ........> > > > Thanks> > > > iolanda>------------------------------------For other ACT materials and list serves see www.contextualpsychology.orgIf you do not wish to belong to ACT_for_the_Public, you may unsubscribe by sending an email to ACT_for_the_Public-unsubscribe@...! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ACT_for_the_Public/<*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional<*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ACT_for_the_Public/join (Yahoo! ID required)<*> To change settings via email: ACT_for_the_Public-digest ACT_for_the_Public-fullfeatured <*> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2011 Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 Whether you agree, or disagree with what someone saidRemember it's not them but thoughts inside their head. > > > > From: cyberfriend cyberfriend@ > > Subject: Thanks - and specific replies > > To: "ACT" < ACT_for_the_Public > > > Date: Thursday, 28 July, 2011, 12:10 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my > > questions) > > > > > > > > Specifically to - > > > > > > > > I don't think I've seen any plan for > > action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? > > > > > > I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years > > and I know the types of things that should be done. I've organsied > > community groups, I 'own'/run a few online email groups, I've > > attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting > > neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community > > events etc. Hey, I even organised - on my own - the 25 year > > primary school reunion and 20 year high school reunion. What I've > > done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness > > in this area. So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was > > calling the local community centre about something. So I don't need > > steps as such but just do something if the opportunity arises but > > don't worry about it. > > > > > > > > Specifically to Helena > > > > > > > > Iolanda, what IS > > your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by > > that? > > > > > > I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying > > them the wrong way (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval' > > problems sometimes) I'll just give examples which is easier for me > > ....... > > > > > > > > I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) > > and I'm sure I said it differently than in the book because I just > > said it while I was in bed and didn't remember the right way to say > > it ........ > > > > > > > > But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started > > to think more about the loneliness and get much more unhappy with > > the word and why I was saying it. So just saying the word itself > > made me unhappy > > > > > > > > Plus the whole "scientific" way of wording it is so against my > > thinking and it makes me somehow more conscious that I'm using those > > words etc because of a problem etc etc. then that makes me feel > > bad in itself. > > > > > > > > So the 2 reasons above then act as a "reminder" of why I'm using the > > strange-sounding technique ..... because I've got a loss of > > something that means something to me. If there was a way to > > handle it without making it so much of a "reminder" then I know it > > would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique > > doesn't leave the "reminder" there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took > > the trouble to send recently. I'm pretty "sensitive" at the moment > > about getting "told off" by anybody in the group so please be > > gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling > > me I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't > > send the email ........ > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > iolanda > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > For other ACT materials and list serves see www.contextualpsychology.org > > If you do not wish to belong to ACT_for_the_Public, you may > unsubscribe by sending an email to > ACT_for_the_Public-unsubscribe@... ! Groups Links> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2011 Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 , Your comment about how you made friends without looking for them came at just the right time. A couple of days ago, my gambling counselor (who isn't into ACT) got me to do a graded exposure list to help me with my social phobia and rating the anxiety level of each item from one to ten. This included things like: talking with an attractive young woman, sitting in a circle where other people can see me, being with a small group at a dinner party, and speaking in front of a group. While doing this exercise, I had a vague idea that it wasn't the right way to go in my case. While progressive exposure is a valuable and proven technique, the focus in this case seemed specifically to be on making friends rather than doing things that interest me and allowing friendships to happen (or not) along the way. Your idea of joining groups that have regular meetings is a good one. I write stories as a hobby, so I could join a writing group; I'm a scientific naturalist, so I could join my local skeptics society; I want to help people with their anxiety issues, so I could join an anxiety support group; I'm interested in philosophy, so I could join a pub philosophy group and enjoy a few beers while grappling with the meaning of existence. I would find all of these activities interesting, stimulating, and challenging. I may or may not make any friends while doing them, but it wouldn't be the goal. Re the criticism you've received about your post, I think it might stem from the limitations of the written word. When we're talking with someone face-to-face, we get lots of extra information in addition to the actual words; things like intonation, facial expression, body language. All these are missing when we read words on a page and often lead us to misinterpreting the speaker's intention. Things that are obviously light-hearted when we can see and hear the person speaking can be misinterpreted when we read the exact same words on a screen. Thanks again for your post. It's given me something to raise with my counselor at our next session. Cheers, Stan > > > Subject: Thanks - and specific replies > To: " ACT " <ACT_for_the_Public > > Date: Thursday, 28 July, 2011, 12:10 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Helena for your emails (and of the others to my > questions) > > > > Specifically to - > > > > I don't think I've seen any plan for > action. Can I push you a bit into taking some? > > > I have been actively doing things to make friends for over 10 years > and I know the types of things that should be done. I've organsied > community groups, I 'own'/run a few online email groups, I've > attended support groups over the years, I've been active in meeting > neighbours and various businesses in the area, attending community > events etc. Hey, I even organised - on my own - the 25 year > primary school reunion and 20 year high school reunion. What I've > done has been complemented by a psychologist I saw about my sadness > in this area.  So this isn't an issue. Even last week I was > calling the local community centre about something. So I don't need > steps as such but just do something if the opportunity arises but > don't worry about it. > > > > Specifically to Helena > > > > Iolanda, what IS > your style of thinking? Can you define what you mean by > that? > > > I'm at a risk of missing out on saying some things here and saying > them the wrong way (sorry, but I've also got 'word retrieval' > problems sometimes) I'll just give examples which is easier for me > ....... > > > > I tried the 3rd defusion method (I'm having a thought that ....) > and I'm sure I said it differently than in the book because I just > said it while I was in bed and didn't remember the right way to say > it ........  > > > > But when I tried it for loneliness what happened was that I started > to think more about the loneliness and get much more unhappy with > the word and why I was saying it. So just saying the word itself > made me unhappy > > > > Plus the whole " scientific " way of wording it is so against my > thinking and it makes me somehow more conscious that I'm using those > words etc because of a problem etc etc. then that makes me feel > bad in itself. > > > > So the 2 reasons above then act as a " reminder " of why I'm using the > strange-sounding technique .....   because I've got a loss of > something that means something to me.     If there was a way to > handle it without making it so much of a " reminder " then I know it > would be easier for me to handle. And the first defusion technique > doesn't leave the " reminder " there. > > > > > > > > I'm just sending the above in reply to the 2 emails that people took > the trouble to send recently. I'm pretty " sensitive " at the moment > about getting " told off " by anybody in the group so please be > gentle if you're going to say something. If you feel like telling > me I'm stupid or I have the wrong priorities etc then please don't > send the email ........ > > > > Thanks > > > > iolanda > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2011 Report Share Posted July 30, 2011 Hi Stan, What you wrote about social exposure caught my attention. In response, I want to propose a rationale for picking exposure activities & see what you think of it. First, some background - I too am doing progessive social exposure exercises. In my case I'm drawing up this list on my own. My own " social avoidance " issue is multilayered. At the simplest level, it involves my avoiding certain kind of activities (calling a friend out of the blue " just to say hi " would be a good example). These small avoidances at first glance can seem trivial - the cost seems so little as to be nothing to worry about. But I see them as also feeding larger patterns of avoidance - e.g. avoiding the more risky effort required to make a new friend, even when the opportunity to do so is put right in my path; or not pursuing certain career options because they too seem " risky. " The underlying fear is of rejection, being judged, etc. And beneath that is the thought, " I'm not worthy. " What I really want to highlight in describing all this is the key idea I have that linkage can exist between large & small avoidances - and that we may not see the linkage or that our mind may poo-poo it. For example, I often experience thoughts that I needn't do the smaller items on my exposure list because " doing those sorts of things isn't my problem anyway. It's not what I really care about. " What I notice about these thoughts is that beneath the superficial rationale that " X isn't important, " there is still avoidance! And this suggests that in fact, the activities on my list that my mind says are not important for social exposure probably *are* important! So if it were me, and if my gambling counselor had me rate items as you describe for how anxious they might make me (talking to an attractive young woman, speaking in front of a group, etc.) ... well, I wouldn't be so much concerned with whether they are " the things that interest me, " but rather, do they in fact make me anxious? Are they the activities I tend to avoid? If the answer to both questions is yes, I would seriously consider going along with my counselor and practicing these as exposure activities. Again, my reasoning would be that avoidance here might very well be feeding avoidance of other stuff. Of course I would feel free to add my own activities to the list, regarding " the things that really interest me " - provided they were really for exposure therapy and not just things I knew I could already do without a problem. Also - and this is just me - I would question my mind if it started telling me that I can just do activities that interest me and " allow friendships to happen (or not) along the way. " My experience has shown me that friendships WON'T happen in this seemingly " natural " manner. Why not? Because even when friendship is a possiblity, someone still has to make the first move. And why shouldn't it be me who makes that move? Aha - because it is scary! And so the mind comes up with seemingly good reasons to " just let it happen or not. " It's like the " reverse compass " in ACT - if the mind is giving a 'good reason' to avoid something, thank it & go ahead & do it anyway. - Randy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2011 Report Share Posted July 30, 2011 Randy, Wow! Thank you As always with your insightful posts, you've given me lots of food for lots of thought. I have a bit too much alcohol in my system right now, so I'll have a good night's sleep and give your comments the thought they deserve tomorrow and get back to you. Cheers, Stan > > Hi Stan, > > What you wrote about social exposure caught my attention. In > response, I want to propose a rationale for picking exposure > activities & see what you think of it. > > First, some background - > > I too am doing progessive social exposure exercises. In my case I'm > drawing up this list on my own. > > My own " social avoidance " issue is multilayered. At the simplest > level, it involves my avoiding certain kind of activities (calling a > friend out of the blue " just to say hi " would be a good example). > > These small avoidances at first glance can seem trivial - the cost > seems so little as to be nothing to worry about. But I see them as > also feeding larger patterns of avoidance - e.g. avoiding the more > risky effort required to make a new friend, even when the > opportunity to do so is put right in my path; or not pursuing > certain career options because they too seem " risky. " The underlying > fear is of rejection, being judged, etc. And beneath that is the > thought, " I'm not worthy. " > > What I really want to highlight in describing all this is the key > idea I have that linkage can exist between large & small avoidances > - and that we may not see the linkage or that our mind may poo-poo > it. For example, I often experience thoughts that I needn't do the > smaller items on my exposure list because " doing those sorts of > things isn't my problem anyway. It's not what I really care about. " > > What I notice about these thoughts is that beneath the superficial > rationale that " X isn't important, " there is still avoidance! And > this suggests that in fact, the activities on my list that my mind > says are not important for social exposure probably *are* important! > > So if it were me, and if my gambling counselor had me rate items as > you describe for how anxious they might make me (talking to an > attractive young woman, speaking in front of a group, etc.) ... > well, I wouldn't be so much concerned with whether they are " the > things that interest me, " but rather, do they in fact make me > anxious? Are they the activities I tend to avoid? If the answer to > both questions is yes, I would seriously consider going along with > my counselor and practicing these as exposure activities. Again, my > reasoning would be that avoidance here might very well be feeding > avoidance of other stuff. > > Of course I would feel free to add my own activities to the list, > regarding " the things that really interest me " - provided they were > really for exposure therapy and not just things I knew I could > already do without a problem. > > Also - and this is just me - I would question my mind if it started > telling me that I can just do activities that interest me and " allow > friendships to happen (or not) along the way. " My experience has > shown me that friendships WON'T happen in this seemingly " natural " > manner. > > Why not? Because even when friendship is a possiblity, someone still > has to make the first move. And why shouldn't it be me who makes > that move? Aha - because it is scary! And so the mind comes up with > seemingly good reasons to " just let it happen or not. " > > It's like the " reverse compass " in ACT - if the mind is giving a > 'good reason' to avoid something, thank it & go ahead & do it > anyway. > > - Randy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 Randy, Having given what you say some clear (and sober) thought, I think that going along with what my counselor suggests is a good idea after all. I think I've been reluctant to engage in exposure exercises to help with my social anxiety because it's scary. And that anxious feeling is good, because it tells me that engaging with people is more important than mind tells me it is. If talking to people really didn't matter to me, I wouldn't feel any anxiety! You're right of course. I can't just let friendships happen without any effort on my part. Other people won't always make the first move because, if they're as normal as I know I am, they have their own fears and anxieties. In a sense, this is a social version of the Bystander Effect, where a group of people see someone in trouble in the street and everyone waits for someone else to make the first move, with the result that no one does anything to help. BTW, if you're in this kind of trouble yourself, pick one person in the crowd and ask them for help directly. This person-to-person contact often helps to break through this wait-for-someone-to-act tendency we all have. (I got this tip from the psychologist Wiseman on one of his TV shows). I'll draw up a list of things I can do to tackle my social phobia and get cracking. Thanks again and cheers, Stan > > > > Hi Stan, > > > > What you wrote about social exposure caught my attention. In > > response, I want to propose a rationale for picking exposure > > activities & see what you think of it. > > > > First, some background - > > > > I too am doing progessive social exposure exercises. In my case I'm > > drawing up this list on my own. > > > > My own " social avoidance " issue is multilayered. At the simplest > > level, it involves my avoiding certain kind of activities (calling a > > friend out of the blue " just to say hi " would be a good example). > > > > These small avoidances at first glance can seem trivial - the cost > > seems so little as to be nothing to worry about. But I see them as > > also feeding larger patterns of avoidance - e.g. avoiding the more > > risky effort required to make a new friend, even when the > > opportunity to do so is put right in my path; or not pursuing > > certain career options because they too seem " risky. " The underlying > > fear is of rejection, being judged, etc. And beneath that is the > > thought, " I'm not worthy. " > > > > What I really want to highlight in describing all this is the key > > idea I have that linkage can exist between large & small avoidances > > - and that we may not see the linkage or that our mind may poo-poo > > it. For example, I often experience thoughts that I needn't do the > > smaller items on my exposure list because " doing those sorts of > > things isn't my problem anyway. It's not what I really care about. " > > > > What I notice about these thoughts is that beneath the superficial > > rationale that " X isn't important, " there is still avoidance! And > > this suggests that in fact, the activities on my list that my mind > > says are not important for social exposure probably *are* important! > > > > So if it were me, and if my gambling counselor had me rate items as > > you describe for how anxious they might make me (talking to an > > attractive young woman, speaking in front of a group, etc.) ... > > well, I wouldn't be so much concerned with whether they are " the > > things that interest me, " but rather, do they in fact make me > > anxious? Are they the activities I tend to avoid? If the answer to > > both questions is yes, I would seriously consider going along with > > my counselor and practicing these as exposure activities. Again, my > > reasoning would be that avoidance here might very well be feeding > > avoidance of other stuff. > > > > Of course I would feel free to add my own activities to the list, > > regarding " the things that really interest me " - provided they were > > really for exposure therapy and not just things I knew I could > > already do without a problem. > > > > Also - and this is just me - I would question my mind if it started > > telling me that I can just do activities that interest me and " allow > > friendships to happen (or not) along the way. " My experience has > > shown me that friendships WON'T happen in this seemingly " natural " > > manner. > > > > Why not? Because even when friendship is a possiblity, someone still > > has to make the first move. And why shouldn't it be me who makes > > that move? Aha - because it is scary! And so the mind comes up with > > seemingly good reasons to " just let it happen or not. " > > > > It's like the " reverse compass " in ACT - if the mind is giving a > > 'good reason' to avoid something, thank it & go ahead & do it > > anyway. > > > > - Randy > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 Randy, Having given what you say some clear (and sober) thought, I think that going along with what my counselor suggests is a good idea after all. I think I've been reluctant to engage in exposure exercises to help with my social anxiety because it's scary. And that anxious feeling is good, because it tells me that engaging with people is more important than mind tells me it is. If talking to people really didn't matter to me, I wouldn't feel any anxiety! You're right of course. I can't just let friendships happen without any effort on my part. Other people won't always make the first move because, if they're as normal as I know I am, they have their own fears and anxieties. In a sense, this is a social version of the Bystander Effect, where a group of people see someone in trouble in the street and everyone waits for someone else to make the first move, with the result that no one does anything to help. BTW, if you're in this kind of trouble yourself, pick one person in the crowd and ask them for help directly. This person-to-person contact often helps to break through this wait-for-someone-to-act tendency we all have. (I got this tip from the psychologist Wiseman on one of his TV shows). I'll draw up a list of things I can do to tackle my social phobia and get cracking. Thanks again and cheers, Stan > > > > Hi Stan, > > > > What you wrote about social exposure caught my attention. In > > response, I want to propose a rationale for picking exposure > > activities & see what you think of it. > > > > First, some background - > > > > I too am doing progessive social exposure exercises. In my case I'm > > drawing up this list on my own. > > > > My own " social avoidance " issue is multilayered. At the simplest > > level, it involves my avoiding certain kind of activities (calling a > > friend out of the blue " just to say hi " would be a good example). > > > > These small avoidances at first glance can seem trivial - the cost > > seems so little as to be nothing to worry about. But I see them as > > also feeding larger patterns of avoidance - e.g. avoiding the more > > risky effort required to make a new friend, even when the > > opportunity to do so is put right in my path; or not pursuing > > certain career options because they too seem " risky. " The underlying > > fear is of rejection, being judged, etc. And beneath that is the > > thought, " I'm not worthy. " > > > > What I really want to highlight in describing all this is the key > > idea I have that linkage can exist between large & small avoidances > > - and that we may not see the linkage or that our mind may poo-poo > > it. For example, I often experience thoughts that I needn't do the > > smaller items on my exposure list because " doing those sorts of > > things isn't my problem anyway. It's not what I really care about. " > > > > What I notice about these thoughts is that beneath the superficial > > rationale that " X isn't important, " there is still avoidance! And > > this suggests that in fact, the activities on my list that my mind > > says are not important for social exposure probably *are* important! > > > > So if it were me, and if my gambling counselor had me rate items as > > you describe for how anxious they might make me (talking to an > > attractive young woman, speaking in front of a group, etc.) ... > > well, I wouldn't be so much concerned with whether they are " the > > things that interest me, " but rather, do they in fact make me > > anxious? Are they the activities I tend to avoid? If the answer to > > both questions is yes, I would seriously consider going along with > > my counselor and practicing these as exposure activities. Again, my > > reasoning would be that avoidance here might very well be feeding > > avoidance of other stuff. > > > > Of course I would feel free to add my own activities to the list, > > regarding " the things that really interest me " - provided they were > > really for exposure therapy and not just things I knew I could > > already do without a problem. > > > > Also - and this is just me - I would question my mind if it started > > telling me that I can just do activities that interest me and " allow > > friendships to happen (or not) along the way. " My experience has > > shown me that friendships WON'T happen in this seemingly " natural " > > manner. > > > > Why not? Because even when friendship is a possiblity, someone still > > has to make the first move. And why shouldn't it be me who makes > > that move? Aha - because it is scary! And so the mind comes up with > > seemingly good reasons to " just let it happen or not. " > > > > It's like the " reverse compass " in ACT - if the mind is giving a > > 'good reason' to avoid something, thank it & go ahead & do it > > anyway. > > > > - Randy > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 Cool. I'll be working on my exposure practice too & I'll post again at some point as to how it's going. Maybe we can share notes! Plus now I know what to do if I'm in trouble on the street ... -R. > > > > > > Hi Stan, > > > > > > What you wrote about social exposure caught my attention. In > > > response, I want to propose a rationale for picking exposure > > > activities & see what you think of it. > > > > > > First, some background - > > > > > > I too am doing progessive social exposure exercises. In my case I'm > > > drawing up this list on my own. > > > > > > My own " social avoidance " issue is multilayered. At the simplest > > > level, it involves my avoiding certain kind of activities (calling a > > > friend out of the blue " just to say hi " would be a good example). > > > > > > These small avoidances at first glance can seem trivial - the cost > > > seems so little as to be nothing to worry about. But I see them as > > > also feeding larger patterns of avoidance - e.g. avoiding the more > > > risky effort required to make a new friend, even when the > > > opportunity to do so is put right in my path; or not pursuing > > > certain career options because they too seem " risky. " The underlying > > > fear is of rejection, being judged, etc. And beneath that is the > > > thought, " I'm not worthy. " > > > > > > What I really want to highlight in describing all this is the key > > > idea I have that linkage can exist between large & small avoidances > > > - and that we may not see the linkage or that our mind may poo-poo > > > it. For example, I often experience thoughts that I needn't do the > > > smaller items on my exposure list because " doing those sorts of > > > things isn't my problem anyway. It's not what I really care about. " > > > > > > What I notice about these thoughts is that beneath the superficial > > > rationale that " X isn't important, " there is still avoidance! And > > > this suggests that in fact, the activities on my list that my mind > > > says are not important for social exposure probably *are* important! > > > > > > So if it were me, and if my gambling counselor had me rate items as > > > you describe for how anxious they might make me (talking to an > > > attractive young woman, speaking in front of a group, etc.) ... > > > well, I wouldn't be so much concerned with whether they are " the > > > things that interest me, " but rather, do they in fact make me > > > anxious? Are they the activities I tend to avoid? If the answer to > > > both questions is yes, I would seriously consider going along with > > > my counselor and practicing these as exposure activities. Again, my > > > reasoning would be that avoidance here might very well be feeding > > > avoidance of other stuff. > > > > > > Of course I would feel free to add my own activities to the list, > > > regarding " the things that really interest me " - provided they were > > > really for exposure therapy and not just things I knew I could > > > already do without a problem. > > > > > > Also - and this is just me - I would question my mind if it started > > > telling me that I can just do activities that interest me and " allow > > > friendships to happen (or not) along the way. " My experience has > > > shown me that friendships WON'T happen in this seemingly " natural " > > > manner. > > > > > > Why not? Because even when friendship is a possiblity, someone still > > > has to make the first move. And why shouldn't it be me who makes > > > that move? Aha - because it is scary! And so the mind comes up with > > > seemingly good reasons to " just let it happen or not. " > > > > > > It's like the " reverse compass " in ACT - if the mind is giving a > > > 'good reason' to avoid something, thank it & go ahead & do it > > > anyway. > > > > > > - Randy > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2011 Report Share Posted July 31, 2011 Cool. I'll be working on my exposure practice too & I'll post again at some point as to how it's going. Maybe we can share notes! Plus now I know what to do if I'm in trouble on the street ... -R. > > > > > > Hi Stan, > > > > > > What you wrote about social exposure caught my attention. In > > > response, I want to propose a rationale for picking exposure > > > activities & see what you think of it. > > > > > > First, some background - > > > > > > I too am doing progessive social exposure exercises. In my case I'm > > > drawing up this list on my own. > > > > > > My own " social avoidance " issue is multilayered. At the simplest > > > level, it involves my avoiding certain kind of activities (calling a > > > friend out of the blue " just to say hi " would be a good example). > > > > > > These small avoidances at first glance can seem trivial - the cost > > > seems so little as to be nothing to worry about. But I see them as > > > also feeding larger patterns of avoidance - e.g. avoiding the more > > > risky effort required to make a new friend, even when the > > > opportunity to do so is put right in my path; or not pursuing > > > certain career options because they too seem " risky. " The underlying > > > fear is of rejection, being judged, etc. And beneath that is the > > > thought, " I'm not worthy. " > > > > > > What I really want to highlight in describing all this is the key > > > idea I have that linkage can exist between large & small avoidances > > > - and that we may not see the linkage or that our mind may poo-poo > > > it. For example, I often experience thoughts that I needn't do the > > > smaller items on my exposure list because " doing those sorts of > > > things isn't my problem anyway. It's not what I really care about. " > > > > > > What I notice about these thoughts is that beneath the superficial > > > rationale that " X isn't important, " there is still avoidance! And > > > this suggests that in fact, the activities on my list that my mind > > > says are not important for social exposure probably *are* important! > > > > > > So if it were me, and if my gambling counselor had me rate items as > > > you describe for how anxious they might make me (talking to an > > > attractive young woman, speaking in front of a group, etc.) ... > > > well, I wouldn't be so much concerned with whether they are " the > > > things that interest me, " but rather, do they in fact make me > > > anxious? Are they the activities I tend to avoid? If the answer to > > > both questions is yes, I would seriously consider going along with > > > my counselor and practicing these as exposure activities. Again, my > > > reasoning would be that avoidance here might very well be feeding > > > avoidance of other stuff. > > > > > > Of course I would feel free to add my own activities to the list, > > > regarding " the things that really interest me " - provided they were > > > really for exposure therapy and not just things I knew I could > > > already do without a problem. > > > > > > Also - and this is just me - I would question my mind if it started > > > telling me that I can just do activities that interest me and " allow > > > friendships to happen (or not) along the way. " My experience has > > > shown me that friendships WON'T happen in this seemingly " natural " > > > manner. > > > > > > Why not? Because even when friendship is a possiblity, someone still > > > has to make the first move. And why shouldn't it be me who makes > > > that move? Aha - because it is scary! And so the mind comes up with > > > seemingly good reasons to " just let it happen or not. " > > > > > > It's like the " reverse compass " in ACT - if the mind is giving a > > > 'good reason' to avoid something, thank it & go ahead & do it > > > anyway. > > > > > > - Randy > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.